Risk factors for thromboembolic events in pediatric patients with ventricular assist devices

{"title":"Risk factors for thromboembolic events in pediatric patients with ventricular assist devices","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2024.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Pediatric patients on ventricular assist devices (VAD) are at risk of thromboembolic (TE) complications. Our objective was to identify factors associated with TE events, including the role of initial anticoagulation strategy and device type in the pediatric VAD population.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective, single-center review (2005-2022) of children who were implanted with paracorporeal pulsatile (PP), paracorporeal continuous (PC), or a combination of devices. Patient- and device-related factors were collected. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to determine freedom from TE. Cox proportional hazard analysis was conducted to look for factors associated with TE events.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Ninety-five patients included with a median age of 0.9 years (interquartile range, 0.3, 5.4); median weight of 8.4 kg (interquartile range, 4.5, 17.8), and 63.2% with noncongenital heart disease. Device breakdown included 47.4% PC, 24.2% PP, and 23.2% combination of devices. Initial anticoagulation was either heparin (61.5%) or bivalirudin (38.5%). In Kaplan-Meier analysis, unadjusted freedom from a TE event was significantly greater in those who received bivalirudin as their initial anticoagulation strategy (<em>P</em> = .02) and PP VADs (<em>P</em> = .02). In multivariate analysis, initial anticoagulation strategy with bivalirudin (hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.75, <em>P</em> = .01) was associated with a reduced hazard of TE events, whereas PC device strategy was found to be associated with an increased hazard (hazard ratio, 2.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-6.88, <em>P</em> = .03).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study suggests that PC device strategy and heparin as an initial anticoagulation strategy are associated with increased hazard of TE events. Further research is required to understand the interaction between device type and initial anticoagulation strategy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266627362400127X/pdfft?md5=8605df4d9e9de4c9419e96624a383e0f&pid=1-s2.0-S266627362400127X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266627362400127X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Pediatric patients on ventricular assist devices (VAD) are at risk of thromboembolic (TE) complications. Our objective was to identify factors associated with TE events, including the role of initial anticoagulation strategy and device type in the pediatric VAD population.

Methods

This was a retrospective, single-center review (2005-2022) of children who were implanted with paracorporeal pulsatile (PP), paracorporeal continuous (PC), or a combination of devices. Patient- and device-related factors were collected. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to determine freedom from TE. Cox proportional hazard analysis was conducted to look for factors associated with TE events.

Results

Ninety-five patients included with a median age of 0.9 years (interquartile range, 0.3, 5.4); median weight of 8.4 kg (interquartile range, 4.5, 17.8), and 63.2% with noncongenital heart disease. Device breakdown included 47.4% PC, 24.2% PP, and 23.2% combination of devices. Initial anticoagulation was either heparin (61.5%) or bivalirudin (38.5%). In Kaplan-Meier analysis, unadjusted freedom from a TE event was significantly greater in those who received bivalirudin as their initial anticoagulation strategy (P = .02) and PP VADs (P = .02). In multivariate analysis, initial anticoagulation strategy with bivalirudin (hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.75, P = .01) was associated with a reduced hazard of TE events, whereas PC device strategy was found to be associated with an increased hazard (hazard ratio, 2.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-6.88, P = .03).

Conclusions

This study suggests that PC device strategy and heparin as an initial anticoagulation strategy are associated with increased hazard of TE events. Further research is required to understand the interaction between device type and initial anticoagulation strategy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用心室辅助装置的儿科患者血栓栓塞事件的风险因素
目的使用心室辅助装置(VAD)的儿童患者面临血栓栓塞(TE)并发症的风险。方法这是一项回顾性单中心研究(2005-2022 年),研究对象为植入体外脉冲式 (PP)、体外连续式 (PC) 或多种设备的儿童。收集了与患者和设备相关的因素。进行了卡普兰-梅耶生存分析,以确定是否脱离 TE。结果95名患者的中位年龄为0.9岁(四分位距为0.3-5.4岁),中位体重为8.4公斤(四分位距为4.5-17.8公斤),63.2%患有非先天性心脏病。设备分类包括 47.4% 的 PC、24.2% 的 PP 和 23.2% 的组合设备。初始抗凝药物为肝素(61.5%)或比伐卢定(38.5%)。在 Kaplan-Meier 分析中,接受比伐卢定作为初始抗凝策略(P = .02)和 PP VADs(P = .02)的患者未经调整的 TE 事件发生率明显更高。在多变量分析中,使用比伐卢定的初始抗凝策略(危险比为 0.30;95% 置信区间为 0.12-0.75,P = .01)与 TE 事件危险降低相关,而 PC 设备策略与危险增加相关(危险比为 2.78;95% 置信区间为 1.12-6.88,P = .03)。要了解设备类型和初始抗凝策略之间的相互作用,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Discussion to: Salvage lung resection after immunotherapy is feasible and safe Salvage lung resection after immunotherapy is feasible and safe Identifying Asian American lung cancer disparities: A novel analytic approach Discussion to: Identifying lung cancer disparities among Asian Americans: A novel analytic approach Risk factors for thromboembolic events in pediatric patients with ventricular assist devices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1