Erik L. Lum , Afshin Pirzadeh , Nakul Datta , Gerald S. Lipshutz , Andrea M. McGonigle , Anum Hamiduzzaman , Natalie Bjelajac , Bethany Hale-Durbin , Suphamai Bunnapradist
{"title":"A2/A2B Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation Using A2 Titers Improves Access to Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Study","authors":"Erik L. Lum , Afshin Pirzadeh , Nakul Datta , Gerald S. Lipshutz , Andrea M. McGonigle , Anum Hamiduzzaman , Natalie Bjelajac , Bethany Hale-Durbin , Suphamai Bunnapradist","doi":"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale & Objective</h3><p>The option for A2/A2B deceased donor kidney transplantation was integrated into the kidney allocation system in 2014 to improve access for B blood group waitlist candidates. Despite excellent reported outcomes, center uptake has remained low across the United States. Here, we examined the effect of implementing an A2/A2B protocol using a cutoff titer of<!--> <!-->≤1:8 for IgG and<!--> <!-->≤1:16 for IgM on blood group B kidney transplant recipients at a single center.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>Retrospective observational study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting & Participants</h3><p>Blood group B recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants at a single center from January 1, 2019, to December 2022.</p></div><div><h3>Exposure</h3><p>Recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants were analyzed based on donor blood type with comparisons of A2/A2B versus blood group compatible.</p></div><div><h3>Outcomes</h3><p>One-year patient survival, death-censored allograft function, primary nonfunction, delayed graft function, allograft function as measured using serum creatinine levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year, biopsy-proven rejection, and need for plasmapheresis.</p></div><div><h3>Analytical Approach</h3><p>Comparison between the A2/A2B and compatible groups were performed using the Fisher test or the χ<sup>2</sup> test for categorical variables and the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 104 blood type B patients received a deceased donor kidney transplant at our center during the study period, 49 (47.1%) of whom received an A2/A2B transplant. Waiting time was lower in A2/A2B recipients compared with blood group compatible recipients (57.9 months vs 74.7 months, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.01). A2/A2B recipients were more likely to receive a donor after cardiac death (24.5% vs 1.8%, <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.05) and experience delayed graft function (65.3% vs 41.8%). There were no observed differences in the average serum creatinine level or estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year post kidney transplantation, acute rejection, or primary nonfunction.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Single-center study. Small cohort size limiting outcome analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Implementation of an A2/A2B protocol increased transplant volumes of blood group B waitlisted patients by 83.6% and decreased the waiting time for transplantation by 22.5% with similar transplant outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Plain-Language Summary</h3><p>Recipient blood type is one of the main determinants of waiting time to receive a deceased donor kidney transplant. Patients with blood type B have some of the longest waiting times for a kidney in the United States. Minorities comprise a large percentage of blood group B waitlist patients, contributing to observed racial differences in kidney transplantation rates. In this study, accepting an A2/A2B incompatible kidney resulted in receiving a kidney transplant almost 18 months earlier compared with receiving a blood group compatible kidney. No differences in outcomes were seen by accepting A2/A2B kidneys.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17885,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059524000542/pdfft?md5=92f55a86a71fc81898e1dda383ac65f6&pid=1-s2.0-S2590059524000542-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059524000542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rationale & Objective
The option for A2/A2B deceased donor kidney transplantation was integrated into the kidney allocation system in 2014 to improve access for B blood group waitlist candidates. Despite excellent reported outcomes, center uptake has remained low across the United States. Here, we examined the effect of implementing an A2/A2B protocol using a cutoff titer of ≤1:8 for IgG and ≤1:16 for IgM on blood group B kidney transplant recipients at a single center.
Study Design
Retrospective observational study.
Setting & Participants
Blood group B recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants at a single center from January 1, 2019, to December 2022.
Exposure
Recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants were analyzed based on donor blood type with comparisons of A2/A2B versus blood group compatible.
Outcomes
One-year patient survival, death-censored allograft function, primary nonfunction, delayed graft function, allograft function as measured using serum creatinine levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year, biopsy-proven rejection, and need for plasmapheresis.
Analytical Approach
Comparison between the A2/A2B and compatible groups were performed using the Fisher test or the χ2 test for categorical variables and the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables.
Results
A total of 104 blood type B patients received a deceased donor kidney transplant at our center during the study period, 49 (47.1%) of whom received an A2/A2B transplant. Waiting time was lower in A2/A2B recipients compared with blood group compatible recipients (57.9 months vs 74.7 months, P = 0.01). A2/A2B recipients were more likely to receive a donor after cardiac death (24.5% vs 1.8%, P < 0.05) and experience delayed graft function (65.3% vs 41.8%). There were no observed differences in the average serum creatinine level or estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year post kidney transplantation, acute rejection, or primary nonfunction.
Limitations
Single-center study. Small cohort size limiting outcome analysis.
Conclusions
Implementation of an A2/A2B protocol increased transplant volumes of blood group B waitlisted patients by 83.6% and decreased the waiting time for transplantation by 22.5% with similar transplant outcomes.
Plain-Language Summary
Recipient blood type is one of the main determinants of waiting time to receive a deceased donor kidney transplant. Patients with blood type B have some of the longest waiting times for a kidney in the United States. Minorities comprise a large percentage of blood group B waitlist patients, contributing to observed racial differences in kidney transplantation rates. In this study, accepting an A2/A2B incompatible kidney resulted in receiving a kidney transplant almost 18 months earlier compared with receiving a blood group compatible kidney. No differences in outcomes were seen by accepting A2/A2B kidneys.