Revision total ankle total talus replacement with a combined constrained implant: A report on 3 cases

Ramez Sakkab DPM, AACFAS , Taylor N. Hooker BS , Jeffrey E. McAlister DPM, FACFAS
{"title":"Revision total ankle total talus replacement with a combined constrained implant: A report on 3 cases","authors":"Ramez Sakkab DPM, AACFAS ,&nbsp;Taylor N. Hooker BS ,&nbsp;Jeffrey E. McAlister DPM, FACFAS","doi":"10.1016/j.fastrc.2024.100391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A non-salvageable talus, often secondary to avascular necrosis, is a difficult pathology to treat. A standard technique for talar defects includes tibiotalocalcaneal fusion with plating or a hindfoot intramedullary nail. The 21st century has brought about the increasing use of total talus replacements as an alternative procedure for severe osteonecrosis of the talus. As total talus replacement becomes more popular, the need for revision options will increase. The present study's evaluates the viability of revision TTR with a talar component constrained into the navicular and calcaneus. Three consecutive patients undergoing revision total ankle total talus replacement were retrospectively reviewed. Two males ages 62 and 57 and a female aged 55 failed conservative therapy at 41, 34, and 29 months after index total talus replacement. Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) was obtained to confirm uptake in the talonavicular and subtalar joint implant interfaces. At 26, 20, and 14 months postoperatively all patients on computed tomography possessed at least 30 % osseous bridging at hindfoot joints. No patient has had a reoperation, and one complication of medial gutter pain was observed. All patients with revision total talus replacement to a combined constrained implant returned to function and avoided tibiotalocalcaneal fusion or below knee amputation. There is a clear need to standardize reporting and establish the safety and efficacy of TTR. Furthermore, more comparative studies between total talus replacement and tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis are needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73047,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.)","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100391"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667396724000314/pdfft?md5=f75acc1d183a2dbb9ec2695b111c995a&pid=1-s2.0-S2667396724000314-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667396724000314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A non-salvageable talus, often secondary to avascular necrosis, is a difficult pathology to treat. A standard technique for talar defects includes tibiotalocalcaneal fusion with plating or a hindfoot intramedullary nail. The 21st century has brought about the increasing use of total talus replacements as an alternative procedure for severe osteonecrosis of the talus. As total talus replacement becomes more popular, the need for revision options will increase. The present study's evaluates the viability of revision TTR with a talar component constrained into the navicular and calcaneus. Three consecutive patients undergoing revision total ankle total talus replacement were retrospectively reviewed. Two males ages 62 and 57 and a female aged 55 failed conservative therapy at 41, 34, and 29 months after index total talus replacement. Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) was obtained to confirm uptake in the talonavicular and subtalar joint implant interfaces. At 26, 20, and 14 months postoperatively all patients on computed tomography possessed at least 30 % osseous bridging at hindfoot joints. No patient has had a reoperation, and one complication of medial gutter pain was observed. All patients with revision total talus replacement to a combined constrained implant returned to function and avoided tibiotalocalcaneal fusion or below knee amputation. There is a clear need to standardize reporting and establish the safety and efficacy of TTR. Furthermore, more comparative studies between total talus replacement and tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis are needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
翻修性全踝关节距骨联合约束假体置换术:3 例病例报告
无法修复的距骨通常继发于血管性坏死,是一种难以治疗的病理现象。治疗距骨缺损的标准技术包括胫骨-踝骨融合加钢板或后足髓内钉。进入21世纪后,全距骨置换术作为治疗严重距骨骨坏死的替代手术的应用越来越广泛。随着全距骨置换术的普及,对翻修方案的需求也会增加。本研究评估了将距骨组件固定在舟骨和小方块上的翻修全胫骨置换术的可行性。本研究对连续接受翻修性全踝关节距骨置换术的三名患者进行了回顾性研究。其中两名分别为 62 岁和 57 岁的男性以及一名 55 岁的女性分别在指数全距骨置换术后 41 个月、34 个月和 29 个月保守治疗失败。单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)确认了距骨和距下关节植入界面的摄取量。术后26个月、20个月和14个月,所有患者的计算机断层扫描结果均显示后足关节处至少有30%的骨桥。没有患者再次进行手术,只有一名患者出现了内侧沟疼痛的并发症。所有接受过联合约束假体的翻修全距骨置换术的患者都恢复了功能,并避免了胫骨与踝关节融合或膝下截肢。显然,有必要对 TTR 的报告进行标准化,并确定其安全性和有效性。此外,还需要对全距骨置换术和胫骨踝关节置换术进行更多的比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.)
Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.) Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Podiatry
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
75 days
期刊最新文献
Interpositional arthroplasty of the fourth and fifth tarsometatarsal joint with an autologous gastrocnemius aponeurosis graft: A surgical technique guide and case series Achilles hero or heel? A systematic review of popliteal nerve block for achilles repair Adenocarcinoma of the lung with metastasis to the foot: A case report MRI findings one year post-radio frequency ablation for chronic Achilles tendonosis: A case report Anatomic lateral ankle reconstruction with tendon allograft after failed brostrom. A case series and surgical technique guide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1