Cardiovascular surgery and cardiology, current status of two sister specialties in Spain: the CARDIOXCARDIO study

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Revista española de cardiología (English ed.) Pub Date : 2024-05-24 DOI:10.1016/j.rec.2024.05.004
{"title":"Cardiovascular surgery and cardiology, current status of two sister specialties in Spain: the CARDIOXCARDIO study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rec.2024.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In recent years, there has been a notable shift in cardiovascular clinical practice within cardiology and surgery. The CARDIOXCARDIO study aimed to identify professionals’ opinions on working practices and relations between specialties. A survey was simultaneously sent to the 4442 members of the Spanish Society of Cardiovascular and Endovascular Surgery (SECCE) and the Spanish Society of Cardiology (SEC), yielding 385 valid responses. More than half (59%) of respondents were men, mostly specialists (7.3% residents), and 74.8% worked in the field of cardiology, predominantly in public centers (88.3%). Using a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5 (worst to best), respondents rated relations between surgery and cardiology with an average of 3.57<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.9 points. Cardiologists rated surgeons with a mean score of 3.83<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.8, while surgeons gave cardiologists a mean score of 3,92<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.72. In addition, respondents provided numerous suggestions for improvement, which are discussed in detail, highlighting certain discrepancies in criteria between specialties. Implementing strategies based on the suggestions of professionals, together with a proactive approach to continuous improvement, could substantially enhance the quality of cardiovascular care in Spain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38430,"journal":{"name":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1885585724001610/pdfft?md5=6a6d426a5f2981c889740530aa9bb10f&pid=1-s2.0-S1885585724001610-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1885585724001610","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a notable shift in cardiovascular clinical practice within cardiology and surgery. The CARDIOXCARDIO study aimed to identify professionals’ opinions on working practices and relations between specialties. A survey was simultaneously sent to the 4442 members of the Spanish Society of Cardiovascular and Endovascular Surgery (SECCE) and the Spanish Society of Cardiology (SEC), yielding 385 valid responses. More than half (59%) of respondents were men, mostly specialists (7.3% residents), and 74.8% worked in the field of cardiology, predominantly in public centers (88.3%). Using a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5 (worst to best), respondents rated relations between surgery and cardiology with an average of 3.57 ± 0.9 points. Cardiologists rated surgeons with a mean score of 3.83 ± 0.8, while surgeons gave cardiologists a mean score of 3,92 ± 0.72. In addition, respondents provided numerous suggestions for improvement, which are discussed in detail, highlighting certain discrepancies in criteria between specialties. Implementing strategies based on the suggestions of professionals, together with a proactive approach to continuous improvement, could substantially enhance the quality of cardiovascular care in Spain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心血管外科和心脏病学,西班牙两个姊妹专科的现状:CARDIOXCARDIO 研究
近年来,心血管内科和外科的临床实践发生了显著变化。CARDIOXCARDIO 研究旨在了解专业人员对工作实践和专科之间关系的看法。我们同时向西班牙心血管和血管内外科学会(SECCE)和西班牙心脏病学会(SEC)的 4442 名会员发出了调查问卷,共收到 385 份有效回复。超过半数(59%)的受访者为男性,大部分为专科医生(7.3% 为住院医师),74.8% 的受访者在心脏病学领域工作,主要在公立中心工作(88.3%)。受访者使用 1 到 5 分(从最差到最好)的李克特量表对外科和心脏病学之间的关系进行评分,平均分为 3.57 ± 0.9 分。心脏病专家给外科医生的平均评分为 3.83 ± 0.8 分,而外科医生给心脏病专家的平均评分为 3,92 ± 0.72 分。此外,受访者还提出了许多改进建议,我们将对这些建议进行详细讨论,并强调各专科在标准上的某些差异。根据专业人士的建议实施相应的策略,同时积极主动地进行持续改进,可以大大提高西班牙心血管病治疗的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
219
期刊最新文献
Comments on the ESC 2024 guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes. Experimental validation of coronary stenosis severity and development of ischemic myocardium. P-wave characteristics during pulmonary vein pacing to guide localization of transient reconnections unmasked by adenosine administration. Comments on the 2024 ESC guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases. Aortic valve calcification volume and prognosis in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1