Outcomes of Early Versus Delayed Manipulation Under Anesthesia for Stiffness Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Arthroplasty Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-24 DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2024.05.059
{"title":"Outcomes of Early Versus Delayed Manipulation Under Anesthesia for Stiffness Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.05.059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div><span>Stiffness following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is often treated with </span>manipulation under anesthesia<span> (MUA). However, there is debate regarding the timing of MUA, with many recommending against MUA beyond 3 months after TKA. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the functional and clinical outcomes of early versus delayed MUA for stiffness following TKA.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A search following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines was performed in the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases in November 2023. Data regarding study characteristics, demographics, knee flexion and extension, patient-reported outcomes, complications, and revisions were collected. A quality assessment was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies. Included were 14 studies analyzing 13,445 knees, 72.1% of which underwent early MUA and 27.8% of which underwent delayed MUA. Of the 14 studies, 10 defined early MUA as being performed within 3 months of the index TKA.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Pre-MUA and post-MUA knee flexion for the early/delayed groups was 71.3°/77.9° and 103.0°/96.1°, respectively. Upon meta-analysis, pre-MUA knee flexion was significantly higher in the delayed group (<em>P</em> = .003), whereas post-MUA flexion was similar in both groups (<em>P</em><span><span> = .36). The mean gain in knee flexion for the early and delayed groups was 32.0°/19.2°. The surgical complication and </span>revision TKA rates for the early and delayed groups were 4.9%/10.3% and 5%/9%, respectively. A meta-analysis found the risk of surgical or medical complications and revision TKA to be significantly higher in the delayed MUA group (</span><em>P</em> &lt; .00001 and = .002, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although post-MUA knee flexion was similar in patients undergoing early and delayed MUA following TKA, the mean gain in flexion for early patients was nearly double that of delayed patients. Delayed patients also had significantly higher risks of surgical or medical complications and revision TKA following MUA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":"39 11","pages":"Pages 2872-2879"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088354032400531X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Stiffness following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is often treated with manipulation under anesthesia (MUA). However, there is debate regarding the timing of MUA, with many recommending against MUA beyond 3 months after TKA. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the functional and clinical outcomes of early versus delayed MUA for stiffness following TKA.

Methods

A search following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines was performed in the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases in November 2023. Data regarding study characteristics, demographics, knee flexion and extension, patient-reported outcomes, complications, and revisions were collected. A quality assessment was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies. Included were 14 studies analyzing 13,445 knees, 72.1% of which underwent early MUA and 27.8% of which underwent delayed MUA. Of the 14 studies, 10 defined early MUA as being performed within 3 months of the index TKA.

Results

Pre-MUA and post-MUA knee flexion for the early/delayed groups was 71.3°/77.9° and 103.0°/96.1°, respectively. Upon meta-analysis, pre-MUA knee flexion was significantly higher in the delayed group (P = .003), whereas post-MUA flexion was similar in both groups (P = .36). The mean gain in knee flexion for the early and delayed groups was 32.0°/19.2°. The surgical complication and revision TKA rates for the early and delayed groups were 4.9%/10.3% and 5%/9%, respectively. A meta-analysis found the risk of surgical or medical complications and revision TKA to be significantly higher in the delayed MUA group (P < .00001 and = .002, respectively).

Conclusions

Although post-MUA knee flexion was similar in patients undergoing early and delayed MUA following TKA, the mean gain in flexion for early patients was nearly double that of delayed patients. Delayed patients also had significantly higher risks of surgical or medical complications and revision TKA following MUA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全膝关节置换术后早期与延迟麻醉下手法治疗僵硬的效果:系统回顾与元分析
背景全膝关节置换术(TKA)后的僵硬通常采用麻醉下手法复位(MUA)治疗。然而,关于 MUA 的时机还存在争议,许多人建议在 TKA 术后 3 个月后再进行 MUA。因此,本系统性综述旨在评估早期与延迟 MUA 治疗 TKA 术后僵硬的功能和临床结果。方法:2023 年 11 月,根据《系统性综述和元分析首选报告项目》指南,在 PubMed、Embase、Scopus 和 Cochrane 数据库中进行了检索。收集了有关研究特点、人口统计学、膝关节屈伸、患者报告结果、并发症和修订的数据。采用非随机研究方法指数进行了质量评估。14项研究共分析了13445个膝关节,其中72.1%的膝关节接受了早期MUA,27.8%的膝关节接受了延迟MUA。在这 14 项研究中,有 10 项研究将早期 MUA 定义为在指数 TKA 术后 3 个月内进行。结果早期/延迟组的 MUA 术前和术后膝关节屈曲度分别为 71.3°/77.9° 和 103.0°/96.1°。经过荟萃分析,延迟组膝关节屈曲前明显更高(P = .003),而两组膝关节屈曲后相似(P = .36)。早期组和延迟组的膝关节屈曲度平均分别增加了32.0°/19.2°。早期组和延迟组的手术并发症和翻修 TKA 发生率分别为 4.9%/10.3% 和 5%/9% 。一项荟萃分析发现,延迟 MUA 组发生手术或内科并发症和翻修 TKA 的风险明显更高(分别为 P < .00001 和 = .002)。结论虽然在 TKA 后接受早期和延迟 MUA 的患者在 MUA 后膝关节屈曲度相似,但早期患者的平均屈曲增益几乎是延迟患者的两倍。延迟患者在MUA后发生手术或内科并发症以及翻修TKA的风险也明显更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor commenting on "Can Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Predict Clinical Outcomes following Total Knee Arthroplasty?" Letter to the Editor on "Chronic Pain Diagnosis Before Total Knee Arthroplasty Leads to Higher Readmission Risk, Lower Patient-Reported Outcome Measures, and Dissatisfaction at One Year: An Analysis of 13,894 Patients". Fellowship Training as a Critical Strategy for Meeting the Future Demand for Arthroplasty Care. Letter Regarding "The Association Between Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Postoperative Complications After Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Chan et al., J Arthroplasty, 2025)". Letter Regarding 'The Femoral Head Edema Zone: A Novel Classification Scheme to Better Predict Osteonecrosis Progression'.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1