Identifying losers: Automatic identification of growth-stunted salmon in aquaculture using computer vision

Kana Banno , Filipe Marcel Fernandes Gonçalves , Clara Sauphar , Marianna Anichini , Aline Hazelaar , Linda Helen Sperre , Christian Stolz , Grete Hansen Aas , Lars Christian Gansel , Ricardo da Silva Torres
{"title":"Identifying losers: Automatic identification of growth-stunted salmon in aquaculture using computer vision","authors":"Kana Banno ,&nbsp;Filipe Marcel Fernandes Gonçalves ,&nbsp;Clara Sauphar ,&nbsp;Marianna Anichini ,&nbsp;Aline Hazelaar ,&nbsp;Linda Helen Sperre ,&nbsp;Christian Stolz ,&nbsp;Grete Hansen Aas ,&nbsp;Lars Christian Gansel ,&nbsp;Ricardo da Silva Torres","doi":"10.1016/j.mlwa.2024.100562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>During the production of salmonids in aquaculture, it is common to observe growth-stunted individuals. The cause for the so-called “loser fish syndrome” is unclear, which needs further investigation. Here, we present and compare computer vision systems for the automatic detection and classification of loser fish in Atlantic salmon images taken in sea cages. We evaluated two <em>end-to-end approaches</em> (combined detection and classification) based on YoloV5 and YoloV7, and a <em>two-stage approach</em> based on transfer learning for detection and an ensemble of classifiers (e.g., linear perception, Adaline, C-support vector, K-nearest neighbours, and multi-layer perceptron) for classification. To our knowledge, the use of an ensemble of classifiers, considering consolidated classifiers proposed in the literature, has not been applied to this problem before. Classification entailed the assigning of every fish to a healthy and a loser class. The results of the automatic classification were compared to the reliability of human classification. The best-performing computer vision approach was based on YoloV7, which reached a precision score of 86.30%, a recall score of 71.75%, and an F1 score of 78.35%. YoloV5 presented a precision of 79.7%, while the <em>two-stage approach</em> reached a precision of 66.05%. Human classification had a substantial agreement strength (Fleiss’ Kappa score of 0.68), highlighting that evaluation by a human is subjective. Our proposed automatic detection and classification system will enable farmers and researchers to follow the abundance of losers throughout the production period. We provide our dataset of annotated salmon images for further research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74093,"journal":{"name":"Machine learning with applications","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100562"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666827024000380/pdfft?md5=98890f0d3d0ca2bae4b005f262aea422&pid=1-s2.0-S2666827024000380-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Machine learning with applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666827024000380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the production of salmonids in aquaculture, it is common to observe growth-stunted individuals. The cause for the so-called “loser fish syndrome” is unclear, which needs further investigation. Here, we present and compare computer vision systems for the automatic detection and classification of loser fish in Atlantic salmon images taken in sea cages. We evaluated two end-to-end approaches (combined detection and classification) based on YoloV5 and YoloV7, and a two-stage approach based on transfer learning for detection and an ensemble of classifiers (e.g., linear perception, Adaline, C-support vector, K-nearest neighbours, and multi-layer perceptron) for classification. To our knowledge, the use of an ensemble of classifiers, considering consolidated classifiers proposed in the literature, has not been applied to this problem before. Classification entailed the assigning of every fish to a healthy and a loser class. The results of the automatic classification were compared to the reliability of human classification. The best-performing computer vision approach was based on YoloV7, which reached a precision score of 86.30%, a recall score of 71.75%, and an F1 score of 78.35%. YoloV5 presented a precision of 79.7%, while the two-stage approach reached a precision of 66.05%. Human classification had a substantial agreement strength (Fleiss’ Kappa score of 0.68), highlighting that evaluation by a human is subjective. Our proposed automatic detection and classification system will enable farmers and researchers to follow the abundance of losers throughout the production period. We provide our dataset of annotated salmon images for further research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
识别失败者:利用计算机视觉自动识别水产养殖中生长发育迟缓的鲑鱼
在水产养殖过程中,经常会观察到生长发育迟缓的鲑鱼个体。所谓 "败鱼综合征 "的原因尚不清楚,需要进一步研究。在此,我们介绍并比较了用于自动检测和分类网箱中大西洋鲑鱼图像中的败鱼的计算机视觉系统。我们评估了基于 YoloV5 和 YoloV7 的两种端到端方法(组合检测和分类),以及一种基于迁移学习的两阶段方法(用于检测)和一种组合分类器(如线性感知、Adaline、C 支持向量、K 近邻和多层感知器)(用于分类)。据我们所知,考虑到文献中提出的综合分类器,使用分类器集合以前从未应用于这一问题。分类需要将每条鱼分别归入健康类和失败类。自动分类的结果与人工分类的可靠性进行了比较。表现最好的计算机视觉方法是 YoloV7,其精确度达到 86.30%,召回率为 71.75%,F1 分数为 78.35%。YoloV5 的精确度为 79.7%,而两阶段方法的精确度为 66.05%。人工分类具有相当高的一致性(Fleiss' Kappa 分数为 0.68),这说明人工评价是主观的。我们提出的自动检测和分类系统将使农民和研究人员能够在整个生产期间跟踪失败者的丰产情况。我们提供了三文鱼图像注释数据集,供进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Machine learning with applications
Machine learning with applications Management Science and Operations Research, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
98 days
期刊最新文献
Document Layout Error Rate (DLER) metric to evaluate image segmentation methods Supervised machine learning for microbiomics: Bridging the gap between current and best practices Playing with words: Comparing the vocabulary and lexical diversity of ChatGPT and humans A survey on knowledge distillation: Recent advancements Texas rural land market integration: A causal analysis using machine learning applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1