Perioperative Demographic and Laboratory Characteristics of Failed Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention: Can We Determine Which Patients Will Fail?

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Arthroplasty Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-24 DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2024.05.065
{"title":"Perioperative Demographic and Laboratory Characteristics of Failed Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention: Can We Determine Which Patients Will Fail?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.05.065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div><span>Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) are the mainstays surgical treatment for acute </span>periprosthetic joint infection<span> (PJI). However, reoperation following DAIR is common and the risk factors for DAIR failure remain unclear. This study aimed to assess the perioperative characteristics of patients who failed initial DAIR treatment.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span>A retrospective review was conducted on 83 patients who underwent DAIR for acute PJI within 3 months following index surgery from 2011 to 2022, with a minimum one-year follow-up. Surgical outcomes were categorized using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society outcome reporting tool (Tiers 1 to 4). Patient demographics, laboratory data, and perioperative outcomes were compared between patients who had failed (Tiers 3 and 4) (n = 32) and successful (Tiers 1 and 2) (n = 51) DAIR treatment. </span>Logistic regression was also performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span>After logistic regression, Charlson Comorbidity Index (odds ratio [OR]: 1.57; </span><em>P</em> = .003), preoperative C-reactive protein (OR: 1.06; <em>P</em> = .014), synovial white blood cell (OR: 1.14; <em>P</em><span> = .008), and polymorphonuclear cell (PMN%) counts (OR: 1.05; </span><em>P</em><span><span> = .015) were independently associated with failed DAIR. Compared with total hip arthroplasty, </span>total knee arthroplasty patients (OR: 6.08; </span><em>P</em> = .001) were at increased risk of DAIR failure. The type of organism and time from primary surgery were not correlated with DAIR failure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div><span>Patients who had failed initial DAIR tended to have significantly higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, C-reactive protein, synovial white blood cell, and PMN%. The total knee </span>arthroplasty DAIRs were more likely to fail than the total hip arthroplasty DAIRs. These characteristics should be considered when planning acute PJI management, as certain patients may be at higher risk for DAIR failure and may benefit from other surgical treatments.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>III.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":"39 11","pages":"Pages 2849-2856"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883540324005370","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) are the mainstays surgical treatment for acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, reoperation following DAIR is common and the risk factors for DAIR failure remain unclear. This study aimed to assess the perioperative characteristics of patients who failed initial DAIR treatment.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted on 83 patients who underwent DAIR for acute PJI within 3 months following index surgery from 2011 to 2022, with a minimum one-year follow-up. Surgical outcomes were categorized using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society outcome reporting tool (Tiers 1 to 4). Patient demographics, laboratory data, and perioperative outcomes were compared between patients who had failed (Tiers 3 and 4) (n = 32) and successful (Tiers 1 and 2) (n = 51) DAIR treatment. Logistic regression was also performed.

Results

After logistic regression, Charlson Comorbidity Index (odds ratio [OR]: 1.57; P = .003), preoperative C-reactive protein (OR: 1.06; P = .014), synovial white blood cell (OR: 1.14; P = .008), and polymorphonuclear cell (PMN%) counts (OR: 1.05; P = .015) were independently associated with failed DAIR. Compared with total hip arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty patients (OR: 6.08; P = .001) were at increased risk of DAIR failure. The type of organism and time from primary surgery were not correlated with DAIR failure.

Conclusions

Patients who had failed initial DAIR tended to have significantly higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, C-reactive protein, synovial white blood cell, and PMN%. The total knee arthroplasty DAIRs were more likely to fail than the total hip arthroplasty DAIRs. These characteristics should be considered when planning acute PJI management, as certain patients may be at higher risk for DAIR failure and may benefit from other surgical treatments.

Level of Evidence

III.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DAIR 失败患者的围手术期人口学和实验室特征:我们能确定哪些患者会失败吗?
背景清创、抗生素和植入物保留(DAIR)是治疗急性假体周围关节感染(PJI)的主要手术方法。然而,DAIR后再次手术很常见,DAIR失败的风险因素仍不清楚。本研究旨在评估初次DAIR治疗失败患者的围手术期特征。方法对2011年至2022年期间因急性PJI在指数手术后3个月内接受DAIR的83例患者进行回顾性研究,随访至少一年。手术结果采用肌肉骨骼感染协会结果报告工具(1 至 4 级)进行分类。对DAIR治疗失败(第3层和第4层)(32人)和治疗成功(第1层和第2层)(51人)的患者的人口统计学特征、实验室数据和围手术期结果进行了比较。结果经过逻辑回归,Charlson合并症指数(几率比 [OR]:1.57;P = .003)、术前C反应蛋白(OR:1.06;P = .014)、滑膜白细胞(OR:1.14;P = .008)和多形核细胞(PMN%)计数(OR:1.05;P = .015)与DAIR治疗失败独立相关。与全髋关节置换术相比,全膝关节置换术患者的 DAIR 失败风险更高(OR:6.08;P = .001)。结论初次DAIR失败的患者的Charlson综合指数、C反应蛋白、滑膜白细胞和PMN%都明显偏高。全膝关节置换术的DAIR比全髋关节置换术的DAIR更容易失败。在计划急性PJI治疗时应考虑这些特征,因为某些患者的DAIR失败风险较高,可能会从其他手术治疗中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
期刊最新文献
Nontraumatic Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: An International Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline. Quality of Life and Outcomes After Treatment Failure for Recurrent Periprosthetic Joint Infection of Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Retrospective Comparison of Transfemoral Amputation, Arthrodesis, and Permanent Spacer Is Semaglutide a Safer Weight-Management Option Than Bariatric Surgery for Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA)? Systematic Review of Metal Concentrations in Blood, Serum, and Tissue Following Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgical Approach Does Not Influence Instability Risk in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With Monobloc Dual Mobility Cup
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1