Thirty-Day High-Grade Aortic Valve Block Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Discharged on Heart Rhythm Monitor

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Structural Heart Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.shj.2024.100317
{"title":"Thirty-Day High-Grade Aortic Valve Block Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Discharged on Heart Rhythm Monitor","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.shj.2024.100317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Conduction disease is an important and common complication post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Previously, we developed a conduction disease risk stratification and management protocol post-TAVR. This study aims to evaluate high-grade aortic valve block (HAVB) incidence and risk factors in a large cohort undergoing ambulatory cardiac monitoring post-TAVR according to conduction risk grouping.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This single-center, retrospective study evaluated all patients discharged on ambulatory cardiac monitoring between 2016 and 2021 and stratified them into 3 groups based on electrocardiogram predictors of HAVB risk (group 1 [low], group 2 [intermediate], and group 3 [high]). HAVB was defined as ≥2 consecutive nonconducted P waves in sinus rhythm or bradycardia &lt;50 beats/minute with a fixed rate for atrial fibrillation/flutter. Descriptive statistics were used to show the incidence and timeline, while logistic regression was utilized to evaluate predictors of HAVB.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Five hundred twenty-eight patients were included (median age 80 years [74-85]; 43.8% female). Forty-one patients (7.8%) developed HAVB during ambulatory monitoring (68% were asymptomatic). Over a median follow-up of 2 years (1.3-2.7), the overall mortality rate was 15.0% (30-day mortality rate of 0.57%, n = 3). Risk factors for HAVB were male sex (odds ratio [OR] = 2.46, <em>p</em> = 0.02, 95% CI = 1.21-5.43), baseline right bundle branch block (OR = 2.80, <em>p</em> = 0.01, 95% CI = 1.17-6.19), and post-TAVR QRS &gt;150 ​ms (OR = 2.16, <em>p</em> = 0.03, 95% CI = 1.01-4.40). The negative predictive value for patients in groups 1 and 2 for 30-day HAVB was 95.0 and 93.8%, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The risk of 30-day HAVB post-TAVR on ambulatory monitoring post-TAVR varies according to post-TAVR electrocardiogram findings, and a 3-group algorithm effectively identifies groups with a low negative predictive value for HAVB.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36053,"journal":{"name":"Structural Heart","volume":"8 4","pages":"Article 100317"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2474870624000654/pdfft?md5=a068e70f14d7024f3f3d40417d2d999f&pid=1-s2.0-S2474870624000654-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2474870624000654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Conduction disease is an important and common complication post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Previously, we developed a conduction disease risk stratification and management protocol post-TAVR. This study aims to evaluate high-grade aortic valve block (HAVB) incidence and risk factors in a large cohort undergoing ambulatory cardiac monitoring post-TAVR according to conduction risk grouping.

Methods

This single-center, retrospective study evaluated all patients discharged on ambulatory cardiac monitoring between 2016 and 2021 and stratified them into 3 groups based on electrocardiogram predictors of HAVB risk (group 1 [low], group 2 [intermediate], and group 3 [high]). HAVB was defined as ≥2 consecutive nonconducted P waves in sinus rhythm or bradycardia <50 beats/minute with a fixed rate for atrial fibrillation/flutter. Descriptive statistics were used to show the incidence and timeline, while logistic regression was utilized to evaluate predictors of HAVB.

Results

Five hundred twenty-eight patients were included (median age 80 years [74-85]; 43.8% female). Forty-one patients (7.8%) developed HAVB during ambulatory monitoring (68% were asymptomatic). Over a median follow-up of 2 years (1.3-2.7), the overall mortality rate was 15.0% (30-day mortality rate of 0.57%, n = 3). Risk factors for HAVB were male sex (odds ratio [OR] = 2.46, p = 0.02, 95% CI = 1.21-5.43), baseline right bundle branch block (OR = 2.80, p = 0.01, 95% CI = 1.17-6.19), and post-TAVR QRS >150 ​ms (OR = 2.16, p = 0.03, 95% CI = 1.01-4.40). The negative predictive value for patients in groups 1 and 2 for 30-day HAVB was 95.0 and 93.8%, respectively.

Conclusions

The risk of 30-day HAVB post-TAVR on ambulatory monitoring post-TAVR varies according to post-TAVR electrocardiogram findings, and a 3-group algorithm effectively identifies groups with a low negative predictive value for HAVB.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术的出院患者在术后 30 天内出现的高分级主动脉瓣阻滞
背景传导疾病是经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)术后重要而常见的并发症。此前,我们制定了经导管主动脉瓣置换术后传导疾病风险分层和管理方案。这项单中心回顾性研究评估了 2016 年至 2021 年期间接受非卧床心脏监护出院的所有患者,并根据心电图预测的 HAVB 风险将其分为 3 组(第 1 组[低]、第 2 组[中]和第 3 组[高])。HAVB的定义是窦性心律或心动过缓<50次/分(心房颤动/扑动的固定频率)时连续出现≥2个非传导性P波。结果纳入了 528 名患者(中位年龄 80 岁 [74-85];43.8% 为女性)。41 名患者(7.8%)在流动监测期间出现了 HAVB(68% 无症状)。中位随访时间为 2 年(1.3-2.7 年),总死亡率为 15.0%(30 天死亡率为 0.57%,n = 3)。HAVB 的风险因素为男性(几率比 [OR] = 2.46,P = 0.02,95% CI = 1.21-5.43)、基线右束支传导阻滞(OR = 2.80,P = 0.01,95% CI = 1.17-6.19)和 TAVR 后 QRS >150 ms(OR = 2.16,P = 0.03,95% CI = 1.01-4.40)。结论 TAVR 术后非卧床监测中,TAVR 术后 30 天 HAVB 的风险因 TAVR 术后心电图结果而异,3 组算法可有效识别 HAVB 阴性预测值较低的组别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Structural Heart
Structural Heart Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
期刊最新文献
Tricuspid Regurgitation in the Setting of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Supra-Annular Versus Intra-Annular Self-Expanding Valves in Small Aortic Annulus: A Propensity Score-Matched Study Targeting the Future: Three-Dimensional Imaging for Precise Guidance of the Transseptal Puncture Can Variation in Costs for Cardiovascular Procedures Be Attributed to Inefficiency in Care Delivery? Challenges in Causality, Data Availability, and the Need for Price Transparency Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Expanding Indications and New Developments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1