Limited Use and Potential Implementation Hurdles of Telemedicine Tools for the Remote Management of Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Among Members of SEPAR

Marc Vila , Javier de Miguel Diez , Vinicius Rosa De Oliveira , Alvar Agustí
{"title":"Limited Use and Potential Implementation Hurdles of Telemedicine Tools for the Remote Management of Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Among Members of SEPAR","authors":"Marc Vila ,&nbsp;Javier de Miguel Diez ,&nbsp;Vinicius Rosa De Oliveira ,&nbsp;Alvar Agustí","doi":"10.1016/j.opresp.2024.100338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Telemedicine (TM) can help in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study examines knowledge, current use and potential limitations for practical implementation of TM for the remoted management of COPD patients among members of the COPD area of SEPAR (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->3118).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An electronic survey was circulated three times to these 3118 health-care professionals. Their knowledge, current use and potential limitations for implementation of different forms of TM, including tele-monitoring, tele-education and self-care, tele-rehabilitation and mobile health, for the remote management of COPD patients were tabulated and described.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Only 120 health-care professionals responded to the survey (3.9%). The rate of response varied greatly across different Autonomous Communities (AACC); 99.2% of responders declared being aware of TM, but only 60.5% knew about the different TM alternatives investigated here, and only 40.3% actually used some form of TM for their current management of patients with COPD. Of those using TM, 47.1% referred being satisfied with its use. Main identified barriers for implementation of TM in their institutions were technological limitations and data security.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The potential of TM for the clinical management of COPD is well known among interviewed health-care professionals, but only less than half used it currently. The potential for growth is therefore clear. We propose that SEPAR analyze critically this potential and promotes measures to achieve it for the benefit of COPD patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34317,"journal":{"name":"Open Respiratory Archives","volume":"6 3","pages":"Article 100338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2659663624000419/pdfft?md5=a8c55ae1b2c834b10379a6f4efbbc260&pid=1-s2.0-S2659663624000419-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Respiratory Archives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2659663624000419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Telemedicine (TM) can help in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study examines knowledge, current use and potential limitations for practical implementation of TM for the remoted management of COPD patients among members of the COPD area of SEPAR (n = 3118).

Methods

An electronic survey was circulated three times to these 3118 health-care professionals. Their knowledge, current use and potential limitations for implementation of different forms of TM, including tele-monitoring, tele-education and self-care, tele-rehabilitation and mobile health, for the remote management of COPD patients were tabulated and described.

Results

Only 120 health-care professionals responded to the survey (3.9%). The rate of response varied greatly across different Autonomous Communities (AACC); 99.2% of responders declared being aware of TM, but only 60.5% knew about the different TM alternatives investigated here, and only 40.3% actually used some form of TM for their current management of patients with COPD. Of those using TM, 47.1% referred being satisfied with its use. Main identified barriers for implementation of TM in their institutions were technological limitations and data security.

Conclusions

The potential of TM for the clinical management of COPD is well known among interviewed health-care professionals, but only less than half used it currently. The potential for growth is therefore clear. We propose that SEPAR analyze critically this potential and promotes measures to achieve it for the benefit of COPD patients.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SEPAR 成员中远程医疗工具在远程管理慢性阻塞性肺病患者方面的有限使用和潜在实施障碍
引言远程医疗(TM)有助于慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)的治疗。本研究调查了 SEPAR COPD 地区成员(n = 3118)对远程治疗 COPD 患者的知识、当前使用情况和实际应用中的潜在限制。结果仅有 120 名医疗保健专业人员(3.9%)对调查做出了回应。不同自治区(AACC)的回复率差异很大;99.2%的回复者宣称知道TM,但只有60.5%的人知道这里调查的不同TM替代方法,只有40.3%的人在目前对慢性阻塞性肺病患者的管理中实际使用了某种形式的TM。在使用 TM 的患者中,47.1% 的人对其使用表示满意。结论受访的医护人员都知道 TM 在慢性阻塞性肺病临床管理中的潜力,但目前只有不到一半的人使用 TM。因此,其发展潜力显而易见。我们建议 SEPAR 对这一潜力进行批判性分析,并采取措施实现这一潜力,从而造福慢性阻塞性肺病患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Respiratory Archives
Open Respiratory Archives Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
51 days
期刊最新文献
Tracheobronchial Amyloidosis: Long-Term Follow-Up and Bronchoscopic Findings Pulmonary Calcifications: A Reflection of Renal Impairment Breaking the Glass Ceiling: Open Respiratory Archives Striving for Gender Equity in the Reviewer Field Real World Experience: Impact of a Specialist Interstitial Lung Disease Nurse on Health Care Utilization Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Mediastinal Cryobiopsy: Tunneling With Different Needle Gauges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1