Impact of frailty on outcomes and readmissions after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in a national cohort

{"title":"Impact of frailty on outcomes and readmissions after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in a national cohort","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2024.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We examined the effect of frailty on in-hospital mortality, readmission rates, and hospitalization costs after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in a population-level cohort.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried for patients who underwent transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement during 2016-2018. Multivariate logistic regression was used to discern independent effects of frailty on outcomes. Kaplan–Meier time-to-event analysis was used to evaluate the effect of frailty on freedom from readmission.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 243,619 patients underwent aortic valve replacement: 142,786 (58.6%) transcatheter aortic valve replacements and 100,833 (41.4%) surgical aortic valve replacements. Frail patients constituted 16,388 (11.5%) and 7251 (7.2%) in the transcatheter aortic valve replacement and surgical aortic valve replacement cohorts, respectively. Compared with nonfrail patients, frail patients had greater in-hospital mortality (transcatheter aortic valve replacement: 3.2% vs 1.1%; surgical aortic valve replacement: 6.1% vs 2.0%; both <em>P &lt; .</em>001), longer length of stay (transcatheter aortic valve replacement: 4 vs 2 days; surgical aortic valve replacement: 13 vs 6 days; <em>P &lt; .</em>001), and greater cost (transcatheter aortic valve replacement: $51,654 vs $44,401; surgical aortic valve replacement: $60,782 vs $40,544; <em>P &lt; .</em>001). Time-to-event analysis showed that frail patients had higher rates of readmission over the calendar year in both transcatheter aortic valve replacement (<em>P &lt; .</em>001) and surgical aortic valve replacement (<em>P &lt; .</em>001) cohorts. This association persisted on adjusted multivariate regression for mortality (transcatheter aortic valve replacement odds ratio [95% CI] 1.98 [1.65-2.37], surgical aortic valve replacement 1.96 [1.60-2.41]), 30-day readmission (transcatheter aortic valve replacement 1.38 [1.27-1.49], surgical aortic valve replacement 1.47 [1.30-1.65]), and 90-day readmission (transcatheter aortic valve replacement 1.41 [1.31-1.52], surgical aortic valve replacement 1.60 [1.43-1.79]) (<em>P &lt; .</em>001 for all).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>For patients undergoing transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement, frailty is associated with in-hospital mortality, readmission, and higher costs. Further efforts to optimize outcomes for frail patients are warranted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"20 ","pages":"Pages 14-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273624001268/pdfft?md5=2078c170c38d3da488b94ad37327c314&pid=1-s2.0-S2666273624001268-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273624001268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

We examined the effect of frailty on in-hospital mortality, readmission rates, and hospitalization costs after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in a population-level cohort.

Methods

The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried for patients who underwent transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement during 2016-2018. Multivariate logistic regression was used to discern independent effects of frailty on outcomes. Kaplan–Meier time-to-event analysis was used to evaluate the effect of frailty on freedom from readmission.

Results

A total of 243,619 patients underwent aortic valve replacement: 142,786 (58.6%) transcatheter aortic valve replacements and 100,833 (41.4%) surgical aortic valve replacements. Frail patients constituted 16,388 (11.5%) and 7251 (7.2%) in the transcatheter aortic valve replacement and surgical aortic valve replacement cohorts, respectively. Compared with nonfrail patients, frail patients had greater in-hospital mortality (transcatheter aortic valve replacement: 3.2% vs 1.1%; surgical aortic valve replacement: 6.1% vs 2.0%; both P < .001), longer length of stay (transcatheter aortic valve replacement: 4 vs 2 days; surgical aortic valve replacement: 13 vs 6 days; P < .001), and greater cost (transcatheter aortic valve replacement: $51,654 vs $44,401; surgical aortic valve replacement: $60,782 vs $40,544; P < .001). Time-to-event analysis showed that frail patients had higher rates of readmission over the calendar year in both transcatheter aortic valve replacement (P < .001) and surgical aortic valve replacement (P < .001) cohorts. This association persisted on adjusted multivariate regression for mortality (transcatheter aortic valve replacement odds ratio [95% CI] 1.98 [1.65-2.37], surgical aortic valve replacement 1.96 [1.60-2.41]), 30-day readmission (transcatheter aortic valve replacement 1.38 [1.27-1.49], surgical aortic valve replacement 1.47 [1.30-1.65]), and 90-day readmission (transcatheter aortic valve replacement 1.41 [1.31-1.52], surgical aortic valve replacement 1.60 [1.43-1.79]) (P < .001 for all).

Conclusions

For patients undergoing transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement, frailty is associated with in-hospital mortality, readmission, and higher costs. Further efforts to optimize outcomes for frail patients are warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全国队列中体弱对经导管主动脉瓣置换术和手术主动脉瓣置换术后疗效和再住院率的影响
目的我们在一个人群水平的队列中研究了虚弱对经导管主动脉瓣置换术和外科主动脉瓣置换术后的院内死亡率、再入院率和住院费用的影响。方法在全国再入院数据库中查询了2016-2018年间接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术或外科主动脉瓣置换术的患者。采用多变量逻辑回归分析虚弱对预后的独立影响。结果共有243619名患者接受了主动脉瓣置换术:其中142786人(58.6%)接受了经导管主动脉瓣置换术,100833人(41.4%)接受了外科主动脉瓣置换术。在经导管主动脉瓣置换术和外科主动脉瓣置换术组别中,体弱患者分别占16388人(11.5%)和7251人(7.2%)。与非体弱患者相比,体弱患者的院内死亡率更高(经导管主动脉瓣置换术:3.2% 对 1.1%):经导管主动脉瓣置换术:3.2% 对 1.1%;外科主动脉瓣置换术:6.1% 对 2.0%):6.1%对2.0%;P均为0.001),住院时间更长(经导管主动脉瓣置换术:4天对2天;外科主动脉瓣置换术:1天对1天;P均为0.001):4天 vs 2天;手术主动脉瓣置换术:13天 vs 6天;P经导管主动脉瓣置换术:51,654 美元 vs 44,401 美元;外科主动脉瓣置换术:60,782 美元 vs 40,544 美元;P <.001),费用更高(经导管主动脉瓣置换术:51,654 美元 vs 44,401 美元;外科主动脉瓣置换术:60,782 美元 vs 40,544 美元;P <.001)。时间到事件分析表明,在经导管主动脉瓣置换术(P <.001)和外科主动脉瓣置换术(P <.001)组别中,体弱患者在历年内的再入院率较高。这种关联在死亡率(经导管主动脉瓣置换术赔率 [95% CI] 1.98 [1.65-2.37],手术主动脉瓣置换术 1.96 [1.60-2.41])、30 天再入院(经导管主动脉瓣置换术 1.38 [1.27-1.49],手术主动脉瓣置换术 1.47 [1.30-1.65])、90 天再入院(经导管主动脉瓣置换术 1.38 [1.27-1.49],手术主动脉瓣置换术 1.47 [1.30-1.65])调整后的多变量回归中持续存在。结论对于接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术或外科主动脉瓣置换术的患者,虚弱与院内死亡率、再入院率和较高的费用相关。有必要进一步努力优化体弱患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Repair of acute type A aortic dissection: The simplest solution is not always the best Are there etiology-specific risk factors for adverse outcomes in patients on Impella 5.5 support? Type B aortic dissection in Marfan patients after the David procedure: Insights from patient-specific simulation Reoperation after aortic root replacement and its impact on long-term survival Should we wait until the morning?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1