Role of Pleural Fluid Lactate Dehydrogenase to Adenosine Deaminase Ratio in the Etiological Differentiation of Exudative Pleural Effusion

S. Indhu, S. Mohanraj, Vishnu Chaitanya, B. M. S. Patrudu
{"title":"Role of Pleural Fluid Lactate Dehydrogenase to Adenosine Deaminase Ratio in the Etiological Differentiation of Exudative Pleural Effusion","authors":"S. Indhu, S. Mohanraj, Vishnu Chaitanya, B. M. S. Patrudu","doi":"10.4103/japt.japt_8_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Although pleural fluid adenosine deaminase (ADA) level >70 U/L suggestive tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE). High ADA levels can also be seen in pneumonia, empyema, lymphoma, malignancy, and rheumatoid pleuritis. Elevated pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is seen in tubercular pleural effusion (TPE), parapneumonic pleural effusion (PPE), and malignant pleural effusion (MPE). Therefore, it is challenging distinguish between TPE, PPE, and MPE based on elevated pleural fluid ADA and LDH levels. In this study, we evaluated the use of pleural fluid LDH/ADA ratio as a new parameter for etiological differentiation of exudative pleural effusions.\n \n \n \n A retrospective hospital-based observational study conducted in GHCCD, Visakhapatnam. A total of 52 patients (TPE – 19, PPE – 16, and MPE – 17) with exudative pleural effusion who fulfilled inclusion criteria were taken into study. Qualitative variables have been described in the form of frequency and percentages. Median and interquartile ranges were used for nonnormal distribution values. Receiver operating curve (ROC) curves with area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.\n \n \n \n The mean ADA value for TPE was 75.4 U/L (25–195 U/L), PPE was 59.1 U/L (13–180 U/L), and for MPE was 35.52 U/L (10–75 U/L). The mean LDH value for TPE was 887.8 U/L (139–2213 U/L), PPE was 1128 U/L (334–3110 U/L), and for MPE was 1470 U/L (234–4285 U/L). On ROC analysis, pleural LDH/ADA ratio ≤20.81 diagnose TPE with (sensitivity – 84.2%, specificity – 63.6%) with AUC of 0.758 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.619–0.866) (P = 0.0001) whereas LDH/ADA ratio in the diagnosis of PPE was found to be >23.39 (sensitivity – 50%, specificity – 66.7%) with AUC of 0.535 (95% CI: 0.391–0.674) (P = 0.689) and the cutoff LDH/ADA ratio in the diagnosis of MPE was found to be >20.86 (sensitivity – 70.6%, specificity – 68.6%) with AUC of 0.724 (95% CI: 0.583–0.839) (P = 0.007). The cutoff value of the LDH/ADA ratio in PPE does not reach the statistical significant value.\n \n \n \n Pleural fluid LDH/ADA ratio ≤20.81 U/L is predictive of TPE, and >20.86 U/L is predictive of MPE and the cutoff value of 20.8 U/L can be used for etiological differentiation of pleural effusion.\n","PeriodicalId":348236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Association of Pulmonologist of Tamil Nadu","volume":"49 38","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Association of Pulmonologist of Tamil Nadu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/japt.japt_8_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although pleural fluid adenosine deaminase (ADA) level >70 U/L suggestive tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE). High ADA levels can also be seen in pneumonia, empyema, lymphoma, malignancy, and rheumatoid pleuritis. Elevated pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is seen in tubercular pleural effusion (TPE), parapneumonic pleural effusion (PPE), and malignant pleural effusion (MPE). Therefore, it is challenging distinguish between TPE, PPE, and MPE based on elevated pleural fluid ADA and LDH levels. In this study, we evaluated the use of pleural fluid LDH/ADA ratio as a new parameter for etiological differentiation of exudative pleural effusions. A retrospective hospital-based observational study conducted in GHCCD, Visakhapatnam. A total of 52 patients (TPE – 19, PPE – 16, and MPE – 17) with exudative pleural effusion who fulfilled inclusion criteria were taken into study. Qualitative variables have been described in the form of frequency and percentages. Median and interquartile ranges were used for nonnormal distribution values. Receiver operating curve (ROC) curves with area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The mean ADA value for TPE was 75.4 U/L (25–195 U/L), PPE was 59.1 U/L (13–180 U/L), and for MPE was 35.52 U/L (10–75 U/L). The mean LDH value for TPE was 887.8 U/L (139–2213 U/L), PPE was 1128 U/L (334–3110 U/L), and for MPE was 1470 U/L (234–4285 U/L). On ROC analysis, pleural LDH/ADA ratio ≤20.81 diagnose TPE with (sensitivity – 84.2%, specificity – 63.6%) with AUC of 0.758 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.619–0.866) (P = 0.0001) whereas LDH/ADA ratio in the diagnosis of PPE was found to be >23.39 (sensitivity – 50%, specificity – 66.7%) with AUC of 0.535 (95% CI: 0.391–0.674) (P = 0.689) and the cutoff LDH/ADA ratio in the diagnosis of MPE was found to be >20.86 (sensitivity – 70.6%, specificity – 68.6%) with AUC of 0.724 (95% CI: 0.583–0.839) (P = 0.007). The cutoff value of the LDH/ADA ratio in PPE does not reach the statistical significant value. Pleural fluid LDH/ADA ratio ≤20.81 U/L is predictive of TPE, and >20.86 U/L is predictive of MPE and the cutoff value of 20.8 U/L can be used for etiological differentiation of pleural effusion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胸腔积液乳酸脱氢酶与腺苷脱氨酶比值在渗出性胸腔积液病因学鉴别中的作用
虽然胸腔积液腺苷脱氨酶(ADA)水平>70 U/L,但提示结核性胸腔积液(TPE)。ADA 水平过高也可见于肺炎、肺水肿、淋巴瘤、恶性肿瘤和类风湿性胸膜炎。胸腔积液乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)升高可见于结核性胸腔积液(TPE)、副肺性胸腔积液(PPE)和恶性胸腔积液(MPE)。因此,根据胸腔积液 ADA 和 LDH 水平的升高来区分 TPE、PPE 和 MPE 是一项挑战。在本研究中,我们评估了胸腔积液 LDH/ADA 比值作为渗出性胸腔积液病因学鉴别新参数的应用。 这是一项基于医院的回顾性观察研究,在维萨卡帕特南的 GHCCD 进行。共有 52 名符合纳入标准的渗出性胸腔积液患者(TPE 19 名、PPE 16 名和 MPE 17 名)被纳入研究。定性变量以频率和百分比的形式进行描述。非正态分布值采用中位数和四分位数间距。计算了接收者操作曲线(ROC)和曲线下面积(AUC)。P≤0.05为具有统计学意义。 TPE 的平均 ADA 值为 75.4 U/L(25-195 U/L),PPE 为 59.1 U/L(13-180 U/L),MPE 为 35.52 U/L(10-75 U/L)。TPE 的 LDH 平均值为 887.8 U/L(139-2213 U/L),PPE 为 1128 U/L(334-3110 U/L),MPE 为 1470 U/L(234-4285 U/L)。在 ROC 分析中,胸膜 LDH/ADA 比值≤20.81 诊断 TPE 的 AUC 为 0.758(95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.619-0.866)(灵敏度 - 84.2%,特异度 - 63.6%)(P = 0.0001),而诊断 PPE 的 LDH/ADA 比值>23.81 诊断 TPE 的 AUC 为 0.758(95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.619-0.866)(P = 0.0001)。39(灵敏度 - 50%,特异性 - 66.7%),AUC 为 0.535(95% CI:0.391-0.674)(P = 0.689);诊断 MPE 的 LDH/ADA 比值临界值为 >20.86(灵敏度 - 70.6%,特异性 - 68.6%),AUC 为 0.724(95% CI:0.583-0.839)(P = 0.007)。PPE 中 LDH/ADA 比值的临界值未达到有统计学意义的值。 胸腔积液 LDH/ADA 比值≤20.81 U/L可预测 TPE,>20.86 U/L可预测 MPE,20.8 U/L的临界值可用于胸腔积液的病因学鉴别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Knowledge and Practices of Airborne Infection Control at the Household Level among Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients Attending a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Central Karnataka, India Hemoptysis and Deep Vein Thrombosis in a middle aged male due to Anti Phospholipid Antibody (APLA) Syndrome’’ - A Case Report Lipoid Pneumonia: Siphoning of Gasoline Can Oscillometry Replace Spirometry as a Major Tool for Lung Function Testing? – An Overview Excessive Dynamic Airway Collapse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1