{"title":"Strategic interactions and the sensitivity of cash savings to stock price","authors":"Rongrong Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.qref.2024.101867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We examine how strategic interactions, i.e., strategic substitutes (SS) and strategic complements (SC), affect the sensitivity of cash savings to stock price. Using a panel data of U.S. firms over the 1997–2019 period, we show that cash savings are more sensitive to stock price among SS than SC and the intensity of rivals’ interactions in product market increases this sensitivity. These results are consistent with research showing that SS are more responsive to product market competition. We further show that R&D intensities and corporate hedging needs act as two channels through which strategic interactions affects cash holdings. First, R&D intensities increase the sensitivity of cash to stock price. This effect is more pronounced among SS, complementing researching showing stock market reacts more strongly to innovation by SS. Second, we report that hedging needs decrease the sensitivity of cash savings to stock price, especially for SC, consistent with the notion that using differentiated inputs increases hedging costs, hence, SC are more conservative in their liquidity management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47962,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 101867"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062976924000735","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We examine how strategic interactions, i.e., strategic substitutes (SS) and strategic complements (SC), affect the sensitivity of cash savings to stock price. Using a panel data of U.S. firms over the 1997–2019 period, we show that cash savings are more sensitive to stock price among SS than SC and the intensity of rivals’ interactions in product market increases this sensitivity. These results are consistent with research showing that SS are more responsive to product market competition. We further show that R&D intensities and corporate hedging needs act as two channels through which strategic interactions affects cash holdings. First, R&D intensities increase the sensitivity of cash to stock price. This effect is more pronounced among SS, complementing researching showing stock market reacts more strongly to innovation by SS. Second, we report that hedging needs decrease the sensitivity of cash savings to stock price, especially for SC, consistent with the notion that using differentiated inputs increases hedging costs, hence, SC are more conservative in their liquidity management.
我们研究了战略互动(即战略替代品(SS)和战略互补品(SC))如何影响现金储蓄对股票价格的敏感性。通过使用 1997-2019 年间美国公司的面板数据,我们发现战略替代品的现金储蓄对股价的敏感性高于战略互补品,而竞争对手在产品市场上的互动强度会增加这种敏感性。这些结果与有关 SS 对产品市场竞争反应更灵敏的研究相一致。我们进一步表明,研发强度和企业对冲需求是战略互动影响现金持有量的两个渠道。首先,研发强度增加了现金对股票价格的敏感性。这一效应在 SS 中更为明显,与股票市场对 SS 创新反应更强烈的研究结果相辅相成。其次,我们发现套期保值需求降低了现金储蓄对股价的敏感性,尤其是对中小型企业而言,这与使用差异化投入会增加套期保值成本的观点一致,因此中小型企业在流动性管理方面更为保守。
期刊介绍:
The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance (QREF) attracts and publishes high quality manuscripts that cover topics in the areas of economics, financial economics and finance. The subject matter may be theoretical, empirical or policy related. Emphasis is placed on quality, originality, clear arguments, persuasive evidence, intelligent analysis and clear writing. At least one Special Issue is published per year. These issues have guest editors, are devoted to a single theme and the papers have well known authors. In addition we pride ourselves in being able to provide three to four article "Focus" sections in most of our issues.