Strategic interactions and the sensitivity of cash savings to stock price

IF 2.9 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance Pub Date : 2024-05-24 DOI:10.1016/j.qref.2024.101867
Rongrong Zhang
{"title":"Strategic interactions and the sensitivity of cash savings to stock price","authors":"Rongrong Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.qref.2024.101867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We examine how strategic interactions, i.e., strategic substitutes (SS) and strategic complements (SC), affect the sensitivity of cash savings to stock price. Using a panel data of U.S. firms over the 1997–2019 period, we show that cash savings are more sensitive to stock price among SS than SC and the intensity of rivals’ interactions in product market increases this sensitivity. These results are consistent with research showing that SS are more responsive to product market competition. We further show that R&amp;D intensities and corporate hedging needs act as two channels through which strategic interactions affects cash holdings. First, R&amp;D intensities increase the sensitivity of cash to stock price. This effect is more pronounced among SS, complementing researching showing stock market reacts more strongly to innovation by SS. Second, we report that hedging needs decrease the sensitivity of cash savings to stock price, especially for SC, consistent with the notion that using differentiated inputs increases hedging costs, hence, SC are more conservative in their liquidity management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47962,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062976924000735","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examine how strategic interactions, i.e., strategic substitutes (SS) and strategic complements (SC), affect the sensitivity of cash savings to stock price. Using a panel data of U.S. firms over the 1997–2019 period, we show that cash savings are more sensitive to stock price among SS than SC and the intensity of rivals’ interactions in product market increases this sensitivity. These results are consistent with research showing that SS are more responsive to product market competition. We further show that R&D intensities and corporate hedging needs act as two channels through which strategic interactions affects cash holdings. First, R&D intensities increase the sensitivity of cash to stock price. This effect is more pronounced among SS, complementing researching showing stock market reacts more strongly to innovation by SS. Second, we report that hedging needs decrease the sensitivity of cash savings to stock price, especially for SC, consistent with the notion that using differentiated inputs increases hedging costs, hence, SC are more conservative in their liquidity management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
战略互动与现金储蓄对股票价格的敏感性
我们研究了战略互动(即战略替代品(SS)和战略互补品(SC))如何影响现金储蓄对股票价格的敏感性。通过使用 1997-2019 年间美国公司的面板数据,我们发现战略替代品的现金储蓄对股价的敏感性高于战略互补品,而竞争对手在产品市场上的互动强度会增加这种敏感性。这些结果与有关 SS 对产品市场竞争反应更灵敏的研究相一致。我们进一步表明,研发强度和企业对冲需求是战略互动影响现金持有量的两个渠道。首先,研发强度增加了现金对股票价格的敏感性。这一效应在 SS 中更为明显,与股票市场对 SS 创新反应更强烈的研究结果相辅相成。其次,我们发现套期保值需求降低了现金储蓄对股价的敏感性,尤其是对中小型企业而言,这与使用差异化投入会增加套期保值成本的观点一致,因此中小型企业在流动性管理方面更为保守。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance (QREF) attracts and publishes high quality manuscripts that cover topics in the areas of economics, financial economics and finance. The subject matter may be theoretical, empirical or policy related. Emphasis is placed on quality, originality, clear arguments, persuasive evidence, intelligent analysis and clear writing. At least one Special Issue is published per year. These issues have guest editors, are devoted to a single theme and the papers have well known authors. In addition we pride ourselves in being able to provide three to four article "Focus" sections in most of our issues.
期刊最新文献
Monetary policy through the risk-taking channel: Evidence from an emerging market Bank insolvency risk, Z-score measures and unimodal returns: A refinement Can corporate social performance mitigate the risk of extreme stock returns? Are public debt and public debt expectations associated with debt management strategies? Time-frequency co-movement and cross-quantile connectedness of exchange rates: Evidence from ASEAN+3 Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1