To reduce or to recycle? Urban residents’ views on food waste and food-related packaging practices in The Hague, Netherlands

Ann Trevenen-Jones, Min J. Cho, Jyothi Thrivikraman, Daniela Vicherat Mattar
{"title":"To reduce or to recycle? Urban residents’ views on food waste and food-related packaging practices in The Hague, Netherlands","authors":"Ann Trevenen-Jones,&nbsp;Min J. Cho,&nbsp;Jyothi Thrivikraman,&nbsp;Daniela Vicherat Mattar","doi":"10.1016/j.wmb.2024.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Urban households are an intimate nexus of food and food waste, connecting people to challenges of sustainability and inequality, in wider food systems. Household food waste (HFW) studies, including those which explored consumption practices during COVID-19, have tended to emphasize the reduction in food waste as part of behaviour change. In 2018/19 an exploratory, interdisciplinary, mixed method study was conducted of HFW perceptions and practices of urban residents in The Hague (Netherlands) with purposeful sampling (n = 19), speaking either Dutch, English or Arabic. Participants took photographs of their HFW for photovoice interviews and focus group HFW stories. The research’s focus is to provide a space for participants to become self-aware of the explicit and implicit understanding of their food practices and their household food waste and its related practices (i.e. food-related packaging). This finding resonated across all hierarchical levels of waste management from best practices, such as, reduction to mixed waste least preferred options. Performing HFW appears to lack comprehensive ecological contextualisation as per the latter part of the urban food system. Dutch and English-speaking focus groups seemed mostly unaware of ‘what happened next’ to their disposed HFW and food-related packaging, whilst the Arabic speaking focus group appeared more comprehensively ecosystem attuned. Given the impetus to a zero-waste more sustainable lifestyle, the transitory implications of knowing more explicitly about ‘what happens next’ to different forms of urban HFW disposal, once it is ‘out of sight’, could potentially offer insights into reconfigured routine HFW performance and therefore require further research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101276,"journal":{"name":"Waste Management Bulletin","volume":"2 2","pages":"Pages 279-287"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949750724000440/pdfft?md5=e56abebc8d1e48113625cee010732a58&pid=1-s2.0-S2949750724000440-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste Management Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949750724000440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban households are an intimate nexus of food and food waste, connecting people to challenges of sustainability and inequality, in wider food systems. Household food waste (HFW) studies, including those which explored consumption practices during COVID-19, have tended to emphasize the reduction in food waste as part of behaviour change. In 2018/19 an exploratory, interdisciplinary, mixed method study was conducted of HFW perceptions and practices of urban residents in The Hague (Netherlands) with purposeful sampling (n = 19), speaking either Dutch, English or Arabic. Participants took photographs of their HFW for photovoice interviews and focus group HFW stories. The research’s focus is to provide a space for participants to become self-aware of the explicit and implicit understanding of their food practices and their household food waste and its related practices (i.e. food-related packaging). This finding resonated across all hierarchical levels of waste management from best practices, such as, reduction to mixed waste least preferred options. Performing HFW appears to lack comprehensive ecological contextualisation as per the latter part of the urban food system. Dutch and English-speaking focus groups seemed mostly unaware of ‘what happened next’ to their disposed HFW and food-related packaging, whilst the Arabic speaking focus group appeared more comprehensively ecosystem attuned. Given the impetus to a zero-waste more sustainable lifestyle, the transitory implications of knowing more explicitly about ‘what happens next’ to different forms of urban HFW disposal, once it is ‘out of sight’, could potentially offer insights into reconfigured routine HFW performance and therefore require further research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少还是回收?荷兰海牙城市居民对食品浪费和食品相关包装做法的看法
城市家庭是食物和食物浪费的紧密联系点,在更广泛的食物系统中将人们与可持续性和不平等的挑战联系在一起。家庭食物浪费(HFW)研究,包括在 COVID-19 期间探索消费行为的研究,往往强调减少食物浪费是行为改变的一部分。2018/19 年,通过有目的的抽样(n = 19),对海牙(荷兰)城市居民的食物浪费观念和做法进行了一项探索性、跨学科、混合方法研究,参与者讲荷兰语、英语或阿拉伯语。参与者拍摄了他们的家庭财富照片,用于摄影舆论访谈和焦点小组家庭财富故事。研究的重点是为参与者提供一个空间,使他们能够自我意识到对其食物做法、家庭食物垃圾及其相关做法(即与食物有关的包装)的显性和隐性理解。从最佳做法(如减少)到混合废物最不可取的选择,这一发现在废物管理的所有层次上都产生了共鸣。与城市食品系统的后一部分相比,高频废物的处理似乎缺乏全面的生态背景。荷兰语和英语焦点小组似乎大多不知道他们处理的高频垃圾和食品相关包装 "接下来会发生什么",而阿拉伯语焦点小组似乎更全面地了解生态系统。考虑到零废弃、更可持续的生活方式的推动力,更明确地了解不同形式的城市高频废物处置 "下一步会发生什么"(一旦 "消失")的过渡性影响,有可能为重新配置的常规高频废物绩效提供见解,因此需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rapid on-site maturity and stability assessment of sewage sludge compost by mathematical treatment of UV and fluorescence spectroscopic data Profiling PBDE emissions from coastal landfills: Impact of waste management practices Sustainable recovery of rare Earth elements from industrial waste: A path to circular economy and environmental health Two inorganic materials were prepared by calcination-acid leaching combined treatment of coal gangue: Al&Fe enriched acid solution and Si enriched material A novel Hausdorff fractional grey Bernoulli model and its Application in forecasting electronic waste
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1