{"title":"(Un)Doing Diversity Work in a “Diverse” Space: Examining Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Work in Historically Black College and University Athletics","authors":"A. Lamont Williams, Marcis Fennell, Yannick Kluch","doi":"10.1123/ssj.2023-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Matters related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) have taken center stage in intercollegiate athletics in response to renewed momentum of the Black Lives Matter movement after the murder of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and Ahmaud Arbery (to name a few) in 2020. Following the trend, athletics diversity and inclusion officer positions have been developed to implement DEI programming and strategy in athletics on respective campuses. However, while research on DEI programming at historically White institutions is well established, inquiries on Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) are rare. To fill this gap in the literature on strategic DEI efforts, the present study aims to analyze the current landscape of DEI work at HBCUs. Drawing from racialized organization theory, we argue that the contemporary conceptualization of DEI hinders the perceptual need for DEI programming at HBCUs. Thus, the monolithic approach of DEI programming cannot remain the pragmatic solution to inequitable experiences in NCAA athletics, specifically at HBCUs. Considerations include budgetary allocations, professional development, and the overall athlete experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":49508,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of Sport Journal","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology of Sport Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2023-0002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Matters related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) have taken center stage in intercollegiate athletics in response to renewed momentum of the Black Lives Matter movement after the murder of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and Ahmaud Arbery (to name a few) in 2020. Following the trend, athletics diversity and inclusion officer positions have been developed to implement DEI programming and strategy in athletics on respective campuses. However, while research on DEI programming at historically White institutions is well established, inquiries on Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) are rare. To fill this gap in the literature on strategic DEI efforts, the present study aims to analyze the current landscape of DEI work at HBCUs. Drawing from racialized organization theory, we argue that the contemporary conceptualization of DEI hinders the perceptual need for DEI programming at HBCUs. Thus, the monolithic approach of DEI programming cannot remain the pragmatic solution to inequitable experiences in NCAA athletics, specifically at HBCUs. Considerations include budgetary allocations, professional development, and the overall athlete experience.
2020 年,George Floyd、Breonna Taylor 和 Ahmaud Arbery(仅举几例)谋杀案发生后,"黑人生命至上 "运动的势头再次高涨,与多样性、公平性和包容性(DEI)相关的事项已成为校际竞技体育的中心议题。在这一趋势下,各大学校园都设立了体育多样性和包容性官员职位,以在体育运动中实施 DEI 计划和战略。然而,尽管对历史上的白人院校的多元化和包容性计划的研究已经非常成熟,但对历史上的黑人院校(HBCUs)的调查却很少见。为了填补有关战略性 DEI 工作的文献空白,本研究旨在分析历史悠久的黑人大学 DEI 工作的现状。从种族化组织理论出发,我们认为,当代 DEI 的概念化阻碍了 HBCUs 对 DEI 计划的认知需求。因此,DEI 计划的单一方法不能继续作为解决 NCAA(全国大学生体育协会)田径运动中不公平经历的实用方法,特别是在 HBCUs。考虑因素包括预算分配、专业发展和运动员的整体体验。
期刊介绍:
Published four times a year (March, June, September, December), the Sociology of Sport Journal (SSJ) publishes original research, framed by social theory, on exercise, sport, physical culture, and the (physically active) body. Analyses from diverse theoretical and methodological perspectives are encouraged to stimulate further research, critical thought, and theory development on topics ranging in broad scope from global professional sport, coaching, commercial exercise/fitness, and recreational physical activity. The journal publishes an array of peer-reviewed research articles, research notes, and book reviews. Members of the North American Society for the Sociology of Sport (NASSS) receive SSJ as part of their membership.