The Lady's Magazine (1770–1832) and the Making of Literary History by Jennie Batchelor (review)

IF 0.3 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Victorian Periodicals Review Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI:10.1353/vpr.2023.a927883
Astrid Dröse
{"title":"The Lady's Magazine (1770–1832) and the Making of Literary History by Jennie Batchelor (review)","authors":"Astrid Dröse","doi":"10.1353/vpr.2023.a927883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The Lady's Magazine (1770–1832) and the Making of Literary History</em> by Jennie Batchelor <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Astrid Dröse (bio) </li> </ul> Jennie Batchelor, <em>The Lady's Magazine (1770–1832) and the Making of Literary History</em> ( Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2002), pp. 320, $120/£85 cloth, open-access e-book. <p>Jennie Batchelor's monograph concerns a principal periodical of the late eighteen and early nineteenth century: the <em>Lady's Magazine</em>. \"The first recognisable modern women's magazine\" was published monthly from 1770 until 1847, ran to over 750 monthly issues, and circulated about 15,000 copies at its peak (3). Women's periodicals have long been considered aesthetically inferior, unintellectual, ephemeral testimonies of an amateur culture. Batchelor argues that \"the <em>Lady's Magazine</em> can, indeed, persuasively write back to a literary history that has traditionally marginalised it on the grounds of its unapologetic popularity and its association with women's reading pleasure\" (3). Batchelor presents a magisterial book that, for the first time, addresses a hitherto neglected field of literary history around 1800 and challenges established narratives. She alternates detective work with large historical arcs to describe the eventful history of the <em>Lady's Magazine</em> from the exciting founding phase in 1770 to 1832, the year in which the Robinson publishing house ceased publication.</p> <p>The book's six main chapters treat the <em>Lady's Magazine</em>'s origins, beginnings, content, authors and readers, rivalries and changes, and literary historical significance. Batchelor begins with a letter from Charlotte Brontë to Hartley Coleridge from 1840, in which Brontë reports on her reading of the <em>Lady's Magazine</em> in her youth. The letter illustrates the ambivalence that characterised the view of this journal in the mid-nineteenth century. On the one hand, the <em>Lady's Magazine</em> seemed old fashioned, as if it had <strong>[End Page 508]</strong> fallen out of time in the modern Victorian literary system; on the other hand, for Brontë it virtually symbolised the emancipation of female reading and writing.</p> <p>The first chapter places the <em>Lady's Magazine</em> in the history of women's journals in the Age of Enlightenment, such as the <em>Ladies' Mercury</em>, the <em>Lady's Museum</em>, or the <em>Female Specator</em>. The aim of all these projects was \"to promote women's reading, women's writing and women's literary history\" (41). The <em>Lady's Magazine</em> followed on from these projects but also found its own paths from the beginning. The second chapter tells the magazine's turbulent founding story: it was essentially shaped by the competition of important players in the London book market, which took place in Paternoster Row, in the centre of the London publishing trade. As early as 1771, John Coote sold the new journal, which addressed the fair sex after the successful model of the <em>Gentlemen's Magazine</em> (founded in 1731), to the booksellers George Robinson (the so-called \"king of the Row\") and John Roberts. Coote's cofounder, John Wheble, did not accept the deal and continued to print a journal under the name of the sold project. This competition led to innovation pressure and accelerated brand consolidation. Robert and Robertson emerged victorious from a court case at the end of 1772, the sources of which (trial transcripts) Batchelor evaluates for the first time. This publisher team determined the great success of the magazine for decades.</p> <p>Crucial to this success was the miscellany format, which offered readers (who certainly included men) the optimal combination of education and entertainment with a heterogeneous mix of popular topics, such as education, Gothic storytelling, oriental tales, and travel writing. Translations also played a major role, especially moral tales from French but also from German and Italian. The \"unfixing of genre\" and other effects of presentation such as seriality and juxtapositions of different texts created new possibilities for reception (82). Thus, the editors succeeded in what Batchelor, drawing on Jon P. Klancher's work, describes as audience-building. Batchelor presents the volume and variety of texts through cleverly chosen case studies that shed light on topics of the magazine. For example, the theme of slavery and abolition plays a major role around 1800. The brutal drama <em>The Negro Slaves</em> (1796) by the German author August von Kotzebue appears (in translation...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":44337,"journal":{"name":"Victorian Periodicals Review","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Victorian Periodicals Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/vpr.2023.a927883","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • The Lady's Magazine (1770–1832) and the Making of Literary History by Jennie Batchelor
  • Astrid Dröse (bio)
Jennie Batchelor, The Lady's Magazine (1770–1832) and the Making of Literary History ( Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2002), pp. 320, $120/£85 cloth, open-access e-book.

Jennie Batchelor's monograph concerns a principal periodical of the late eighteen and early nineteenth century: the Lady's Magazine. "The first recognisable modern women's magazine" was published monthly from 1770 until 1847, ran to over 750 monthly issues, and circulated about 15,000 copies at its peak (3). Women's periodicals have long been considered aesthetically inferior, unintellectual, ephemeral testimonies of an amateur culture. Batchelor argues that "the Lady's Magazine can, indeed, persuasively write back to a literary history that has traditionally marginalised it on the grounds of its unapologetic popularity and its association with women's reading pleasure" (3). Batchelor presents a magisterial book that, for the first time, addresses a hitherto neglected field of literary history around 1800 and challenges established narratives. She alternates detective work with large historical arcs to describe the eventful history of the Lady's Magazine from the exciting founding phase in 1770 to 1832, the year in which the Robinson publishing house ceased publication.

The book's six main chapters treat the Lady's Magazine's origins, beginnings, content, authors and readers, rivalries and changes, and literary historical significance. Batchelor begins with a letter from Charlotte Brontë to Hartley Coleridge from 1840, in which Brontë reports on her reading of the Lady's Magazine in her youth. The letter illustrates the ambivalence that characterised the view of this journal in the mid-nineteenth century. On the one hand, the Lady's Magazine seemed old fashioned, as if it had [End Page 508] fallen out of time in the modern Victorian literary system; on the other hand, for Brontë it virtually symbolised the emancipation of female reading and writing.

The first chapter places the Lady's Magazine in the history of women's journals in the Age of Enlightenment, such as the Ladies' Mercury, the Lady's Museum, or the Female Specator. The aim of all these projects was "to promote women's reading, women's writing and women's literary history" (41). The Lady's Magazine followed on from these projects but also found its own paths from the beginning. The second chapter tells the magazine's turbulent founding story: it was essentially shaped by the competition of important players in the London book market, which took place in Paternoster Row, in the centre of the London publishing trade. As early as 1771, John Coote sold the new journal, which addressed the fair sex after the successful model of the Gentlemen's Magazine (founded in 1731), to the booksellers George Robinson (the so-called "king of the Row") and John Roberts. Coote's cofounder, John Wheble, did not accept the deal and continued to print a journal under the name of the sold project. This competition led to innovation pressure and accelerated brand consolidation. Robert and Robertson emerged victorious from a court case at the end of 1772, the sources of which (trial transcripts) Batchelor evaluates for the first time. This publisher team determined the great success of the magazine for decades.

Crucial to this success was the miscellany format, which offered readers (who certainly included men) the optimal combination of education and entertainment with a heterogeneous mix of popular topics, such as education, Gothic storytelling, oriental tales, and travel writing. Translations also played a major role, especially moral tales from French but also from German and Italian. The "unfixing of genre" and other effects of presentation such as seriality and juxtapositions of different texts created new possibilities for reception (82). Thus, the editors succeeded in what Batchelor, drawing on Jon P. Klancher's work, describes as audience-building. Batchelor presents the volume and variety of texts through cleverly chosen case studies that shed light on topics of the magazine. For example, the theme of slavery and abolition plays a major role around 1800. The brutal drama The Negro Slaves (1796) by the German author August von Kotzebue appears (in translation...

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Jennie Batchelor 所著的《女士杂志(1770-1832 年)与文学史的形成》(评论)
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 Jennie Batchelor 著,The Lady's Magazine (1770-1832) and the Making of Literary History(《女士杂志(1770-1832)与文学史的形成》) Astrid Dröse (bio) Jennie Batchelor 著,The Lady's Magazine (1770-1832) and the Making of Literary History(《女士杂志(1770-1832)与文学史的形成》)(爱丁堡:爱丁堡大学出版社,2002 年),第 320 页,每页 120 美元/85 英镑,电子书可开放获取。Jennie Batchelor 的专著涉及十八世纪末十九世纪初的一份主要期刊:《女士杂志》。这是 "第一本公认的现代女性杂志",从 1770 年到 1847 年每月出版一期,每月发行 750 多期,发行量最高时达到 15,000 册(3)。长期以来,女性期刊一直被认为是审美低劣、非知识性、昙花一现的业余文化见证。Batchelor 认为,"《女士杂志》的确可以令人信服地回溯文学史,而文学史传统上一直以其毫无保留的受欢迎程度及其与女性阅读乐趣的联系为由将其边缘化"(3)。Batchelor 的这本巨著首次论述了 1800 年前后迄今为止被忽视的文学史领域,并对既有叙事提出了挑战。她以侦探小说和大历史弧线交替的方式,描述了《女士杂志》从 1770 年激动人心的创刊阶段到 1832 年(罗宾逊出版社停刊的那一年)的峥嵘历史。全书共六章,分别论述了《女士杂志》的起源、开端、内容、作者与读者、竞争与变革以及文学史意义。Batchelor 以夏洛特-勃朗特 1840 年写给哈特利-柯勒律治的一封信开篇,勃朗特在信中讲述了她年轻时阅读《女士杂志》的经历。信中描述了 19 世纪中期人们对这本杂志的矛盾看法。一方面,《淑女杂志》显得陈旧过时,仿佛 [尾页 508]在维多利亚时代的现代文学体系中已不合时宜;另一方面,对勃朗特来说,它实际上象征着女性阅读和写作的解放。第一章将《淑女杂志》置于启蒙时代女性期刊的历史中,如《淑女水星》、《淑女博物馆》或《女性标本》。所有这些项目的目的都是 "促进女性阅读、女性写作和女性文学史"(41)。女士杂志》继承了这些项目,但也从一开始就找到了自己的道路。第二章讲述了该杂志动荡的创刊故事:它主要是在伦敦图书市场重要参与者的竞争中形成的,竞争发生在伦敦出版业中心的帕特诺斯特街。早在 1771 年,约翰-库特就仿照《绅士杂志》(创刊于 1731 年)的成功模式,将这本面向女性读者的新杂志卖给了书商乔治-罗宾逊(George Robinson,人称 "Paternoster Row 之王")和约翰-罗伯茨(John Roberts)。库特的共同创始人约翰-惠布尔(John Wheble)没有接受这笔交易,而是继续以已售出项目的名义印刷杂志。这场竞争带来了创新压力,加速了品牌整合。1772 年底,罗伯特和罗伯逊在一场官司中胜出,巴切勒首次对这场官司的资料来源(庭审记录)进行了评估。这个出版商团队决定了杂志几十年来的巨大成功。杂文形式是该杂志成功的关键,它为读者(当然也包括男性读者)提供了教育与娱乐的最佳结合,并将教育、哥特故事、东方故事和游记等热门话题杂糅在一起。翻译作品也发挥了重要作用,尤其是从法语以及德语和意大利语翻译的道德故事。体裁的不固定 "和其他表现形式的效果,如连载和不同文本的并置,为读者的接受创造了新的可能性(82)。因此,编辑们成功地实现了 Batchelor 借鉴 Jon P. Klancher 的研究成果所描述的 "受众培养"。Batchelor 通过巧妙地选择案例研究来展示文本的数量和多样性,从而揭示杂志的主题。例如,奴隶制和废奴主题在 1800 年前后占据了重要地位。德国作家奥古斯特-冯-科策布(August von Kotzebue)创作的残酷戏剧《黑奴》(1796 年)(译本)出现在该杂志上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Victorian Periodicals Review
Victorian Periodicals Review HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biographies Introduction: On Not Mastering Race and Transnationalism in Victorian Periodical Studies Scientific Periodicals, Numerical Inscriptions, and Indigenous Lifeworlds in Nineteenth-Century Southeast Asia Reporting on "Torturing a Negro": Challenging Prison Violence and Frameworks of Transnational White Supremacy in the Tocsin The Entangled History of Ale-Quillén: Imagining the Indigenous Woman in Nineteenth-Century Chile
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1