Generalization of a Deep Learning Model for Continuous Glucose Monitoring–Based Hypoglycemia Prediction: Algorithm Development and Validation Study

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS JMIR Medical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-05-24 DOI:10.2196/56909
Jian Shao, Ying Pan, Wei-Bin Kou, Huyi Feng, Yu Zhao, Kaixin Zhou, Shao Zhong
{"title":"Generalization of a Deep Learning Model for Continuous Glucose Monitoring–Based Hypoglycemia Prediction: Algorithm Development and Validation Study","authors":"Jian Shao, Ying Pan, Wei-Bin Kou, Huyi Feng, Yu Zhao, Kaixin Zhou, Shao Zhong","doi":"10.2196/56909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Predicting hypoglycemia while maintaining low false alarm rate is a challenge for wide adoption of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in diabetes management. One small study suggested the long short-term memory (LSTM) network deep learning model had better performance of hypoglycemia prediction than traditional machine learning algorithms in European patients with type 1 diabetes. However, given that many well-recognized deep learning models perform poorly outside the training consideration, whether the LSTM model could be generalized to different populations or patients with other diabetes subtypes are unknown. Objective: The aim of this study is to validate the LSTM hypoglycemia prediction models in more diverse populations and a wide spectrum of patients with different types of diabetes. Methods: We assembled two large datasets of patients with both type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes. The primary dataset containing 192 patients from Chinese were used to develop the LSTM, support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF) models for hypoglycemia prediction at the prediction horizon of 30 minutes. Hypoglycemia was defined as the mild (54mg/dl <= glucose < 70mg/dl) and severe (< 54mg/dl) hypoglycemic level separately. The validation dataset of 427 patients from European-Americans was used to validate the models and examine their generalizations. The predictive performance of the models was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity and area under the operating curve (AUC). Results: For the difficulty to predict mild hypoglycemia events, the LSTM model always achieved AUC greater than 97% in the primary dataset, with less than 3% AUC reduction in the validation dataset, indicating the model was robust and generalizable across populations. AUC higher than 93% was also achieved when LSTM was applied to both type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes in the validation dataset, further strengthening the generalizability of the model. Under different satisfactory levels of sensitivity for mild and severe hypoglycemia prediction, the LSTM model achieved higher specificity than the SVM and RF models, thereby reducing false alarms. Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that the LSTM model was robust for hypoglycemia prediction and generalizable across populations or diabetes subtypes. Given its extra advantage on false alarm reduction, the LSTM model was a strong candidate to be widely implemented by future CGM devices for hypoglycemia prediction.","PeriodicalId":56334,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/56909","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Predicting hypoglycemia while maintaining low false alarm rate is a challenge for wide adoption of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in diabetes management. One small study suggested the long short-term memory (LSTM) network deep learning model had better performance of hypoglycemia prediction than traditional machine learning algorithms in European patients with type 1 diabetes. However, given that many well-recognized deep learning models perform poorly outside the training consideration, whether the LSTM model could be generalized to different populations or patients with other diabetes subtypes are unknown. Objective: The aim of this study is to validate the LSTM hypoglycemia prediction models in more diverse populations and a wide spectrum of patients with different types of diabetes. Methods: We assembled two large datasets of patients with both type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes. The primary dataset containing 192 patients from Chinese were used to develop the LSTM, support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF) models for hypoglycemia prediction at the prediction horizon of 30 minutes. Hypoglycemia was defined as the mild (54mg/dl <= glucose < 70mg/dl) and severe (< 54mg/dl) hypoglycemic level separately. The validation dataset of 427 patients from European-Americans was used to validate the models and examine their generalizations. The predictive performance of the models was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity and area under the operating curve (AUC). Results: For the difficulty to predict mild hypoglycemia events, the LSTM model always achieved AUC greater than 97% in the primary dataset, with less than 3% AUC reduction in the validation dataset, indicating the model was robust and generalizable across populations. AUC higher than 93% was also achieved when LSTM was applied to both type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes in the validation dataset, further strengthening the generalizability of the model. Under different satisfactory levels of sensitivity for mild and severe hypoglycemia prediction, the LSTM model achieved higher specificity than the SVM and RF models, thereby reducing false alarms. Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that the LSTM model was robust for hypoglycemia prediction and generalizable across populations or diabetes subtypes. Given its extra advantage on false alarm reduction, the LSTM model was a strong candidate to be widely implemented by future CGM devices for hypoglycemia prediction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于连续葡萄糖监测的低血糖预测深度学习模型的泛化:算法开发与验证研究
背景:预测低血糖同时保持较低的误报率是在糖尿病管理中广泛采用连续血糖监测(CGM)所面临的挑战。一项小型研究表明,在欧洲的 1 型糖尿病患者中,长短期记忆(LSTM)网络深度学习模型的低血糖预测性能优于传统的机器学习算法。然而,鉴于许多公认的深度学习模型在训练考量之外表现不佳,LSTM 模型能否推广到不同人群或其他糖尿病亚型患者尚不可知。研究目的本研究旨在验证 LSTM 低血糖预测模型在更多不同人群和不同类型糖尿病患者中的应用。研究方法我们收集了两个大型数据集,分别包含 1 型糖尿病和 2 型糖尿病患者。主要数据集包含 192 名中国患者,用于开发 LSTM、支持向量机 (SVM) 和随机森林 (RF) 模型,在 30 分钟的预测范围内预测低血糖。低血糖分别定义为轻度(54mg/dl <= 血糖 < 70mg/dl)和重度(< 54mg/dl)低血糖。由 427 名欧美患者组成的验证数据集用于验证模型并检查其概括性。模型的预测性能通过灵敏度、特异性和工作曲线下面积(AUC)进行评估。结果显示对于难以预测的轻度低血糖事件,LSTM 模型在主要数据集中的 AUC 始终高于 97%,在验证数据集中的 AUC 降低率低于 3%,这表明该模型具有稳健性和跨人群普适性。当 LSTM 同时应用于验证数据集中的 1 型糖尿病和 2 型糖尿病时,AUC 也高于 93%,进一步增强了模型的普适性。在轻度和重度低血糖预测灵敏度不同的满意度水平下,LSTM 模型的特异性高于 SVM 和 RF 模型,从而减少了误报。结论我们的研究结果表明,LSTM 模型在预测低血糖症方面非常稳健,而且可以在不同人群或糖尿病亚型中通用。鉴于 LSTM 模型在减少误报方面的额外优势,它是未来 CGM 设备广泛应用于低血糖预测的有力候选模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Medical Informatics
JMIR Medical Informatics Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
173
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR Medical Informatics (JMI, ISSN 2291-9694) is a top-rated, tier A journal which focuses on clinical informatics, big data in health and health care, decision support for health professionals, electronic health records, ehealth infrastructures and implementation. It has a focus on applied, translational research, with a broad readership including clinicians, CIOs, engineers, industry and health informatics professionals. Published by JMIR Publications, publisher of the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR), the leading eHealth/mHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175), JMIR Med Inform has a slightly different scope (emphasizing more on applications for clinicians and health professionals rather than consumers/citizens, which is the focus of JMIR), publishes even faster, and also allows papers which are more technical or more formative than what would be published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Study to Evaluate the Accuracy of Differential Diagnosis Lists Generated by Gemini Advanced, Gemini, and Bard for a Case Report Series Analysis: Cross-Sectional Study. Disambiguating Clinical Abbreviations by One-to-All Classification: Algorithm Development and Validation Study. Addressing Information Biases Within Electronic Health Record Data to Improve the Examination of Epidemiologic Associations With Diabetes Prevalence Among Young Adults: Cross-Sectional Study. Toward Better Semantic Interoperability of Data Element Repositories in Medicine: Analysis Study. Practical Aspects of Using Large Language Models to Screen Abstracts for Cardiovascular Drug Development: Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1