The long-term adherence following the end of Community Treatment Order: A systematic review

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-05-25 DOI:10.1111/acps.13709
Giulia Cossu, Goce Kalcev, Federica Sancassiani, Diego Primavera, Davide Gyppaz, Thurayya Zreik, Mauro Giovanni Carta
{"title":"The long-term adherence following the end of Community Treatment Order: A systematic review","authors":"Giulia Cossu,&nbsp;Goce Kalcev,&nbsp;Federica Sancassiani,&nbsp;Diego Primavera,&nbsp;Davide Gyppaz,&nbsp;Thurayya Zreik,&nbsp;Mauro Giovanni Carta","doi":"10.1111/acps.13709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The community treatment order (CTO) is designed to deliver mental healthcare in the community and has been introduced in around 75 jurisdictions worldwide. It constitutes a legal obligation in which individuals with severe mental illness must adhere to out-of-hospital treatment plans. Despite intense criticism and the debated nature of published evidence, it has emerged as a clinical and policy response to frequent hospital readmissions and to enhance adherence in cases where there is refusal of pharmacological treatments. This systematic review outlines findings on CTO long-term adherence, after mandatory outpatient treatment has ended, in studies that include people with psychiatric disorders.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Following PRISMA guidelines, we performed a review of published articles from PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and CINAHL up to January 15, 2023. We included studies that assessed adherence after CTO ends. The study is registered with PROSPERO number CRD42022360879.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Six independent studies analyzing the main indicators of long adherence: engagement with services and medication adherence, were included. The average methodological quality of the studies included is fair. Long-term adherence was assessed over a period ranging from 11 to 28 months. Only two studies reported a statistically significant improvement. Regarding the remaining studies, no positive correlation was observed, except for certain subgroup samples, while in one study, medication adherence decreased.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Scientific evidence supporting the hypothesis that CTO has a positive role on long-term adherence post-obligation is currently not sufficient. Given the importance of modern recovery-oriented approaches and the coercive nature of compulsory outpatient treatment, it is necessary that future studies ensure the role of CTO in effectively promoting adherence.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":108,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","volume":"150 2","pages":"78-90"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acps.13709","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The community treatment order (CTO) is designed to deliver mental healthcare in the community and has been introduced in around 75 jurisdictions worldwide. It constitutes a legal obligation in which individuals with severe mental illness must adhere to out-of-hospital treatment plans. Despite intense criticism and the debated nature of published evidence, it has emerged as a clinical and policy response to frequent hospital readmissions and to enhance adherence in cases where there is refusal of pharmacological treatments. This systematic review outlines findings on CTO long-term adherence, after mandatory outpatient treatment has ended, in studies that include people with psychiatric disorders.

Method

Following PRISMA guidelines, we performed a review of published articles from PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and CINAHL up to January 15, 2023. We included studies that assessed adherence after CTO ends. The study is registered with PROSPERO number CRD42022360879.

Results

Six independent studies analyzing the main indicators of long adherence: engagement with services and medication adherence, were included. The average methodological quality of the studies included is fair. Long-term adherence was assessed over a period ranging from 11 to 28 months. Only two studies reported a statistically significant improvement. Regarding the remaining studies, no positive correlation was observed, except for certain subgroup samples, while in one study, medication adherence decreased.

Conclusion

Scientific evidence supporting the hypothesis that CTO has a positive role on long-term adherence post-obligation is currently not sufficient. Given the importance of modern recovery-oriented approaches and the coercive nature of compulsory outpatient treatment, it is necessary that future studies ensure the role of CTO in effectively promoting adherence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区治疗令结束后的长期坚持:系统回顾
背景社区治疗令(Community Treatment Order,CTO)旨在社区内提供精神医疗服务,已在全球约 75 个司法管辖区推行。它是一项法律义务,要求患有严重精神疾病的个人必须遵守院外治疗计划。尽管存在着激烈的批评和对已发表证据的争论,但它已成为临床和政策应对频繁再入院和在拒绝药物治疗的情况下提高依从性的措施。本系统性综述概述了在强制门诊治疗结束后,包括精神障碍患者在内的研究对 CTO 长期依从性的研究结果。方法按照 PRISMA 指南,我们对截至 2023 年 1 月 15 日在 PubMed、PsycINFO、EMBASE 和 CINAHL 上发表的文章进行了综述。我们纳入了评估 CTO 结束后依从性的研究。结果纳入了六项独立研究,这些研究分析了长期依从性的主要指标:参与服务和坚持用药。所纳入研究的平均方法学质量尚可。长期依从性的评估周期为 11 至 28 个月不等。仅有两项研究报告了在统计意义上的显著改善。关于其余的研究,除了某些亚组样本外,没有观察到正相关性,而在一项研究中,服药依从性有所下降。结论目前支持 CTO 对服药后长期依从性有积极作用这一假设的科学证据还不充分。鉴于以康复为导向的现代方法的重要性和强制门诊治疗的强制性,未来的研究有必要确保 CTO 在有效促进服药依从性方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica acts as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science and practice of psychiatry. In particular we focus on communicating frontline research to clinical psychiatrists and psychiatric researchers. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica has traditionally been and remains a journal focusing predominantly on clinical psychiatry, but translational psychiatry is a topic of growing importance to our readers. Therefore, the journal welcomes submission of manuscripts based on both clinical- and more translational (e.g. preclinical and epidemiological) research. When preparing manuscripts based on translational studies for submission to Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, the authors should place emphasis on the clinical significance of the research question and the findings. Manuscripts based solely on preclinical research (e.g. animal models) are normally not considered for publication in the Journal.
期刊最新文献
More rTMS pulses or more sessions? The impact on treatment outcome for treatment resistant depression. Letter to the Editor Concerning "Glucagon-Like Peptide Agonists for Weight Management in Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis". Prediction of electroconvulsive therapy outcome: A network analysis approach. How to treat antipsychotic-related weight gain and metabolic disturbances: Is there a role for GLP-1 receptor agonists? Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1