Incidence and risk factors for central venous access device failure in hospitalized adults: A multivariable analysis of 1892 catheters

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of hospital medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-27 DOI:10.1002/jhm.13414
Amanda Corley RN, MAdvPrac, PhD, Ruth H. Royle RN, MEcon, Nicole Marsh RN, MAdvPrac, PhD, Emily N. Larsen RN, GDipHlthRes, PhD (Cand), E. Geoffrey Playford MBBS (Hons), MMed (Clin Epi), PhD, FRACP, FRCPA, Matthew R. McGrail PhD, Naomi Runnegar MBBS, FRACP, FRCPA, Robert S. Ware BSc, PhD, Nicole C. Gavin RN, MAdvPrac, PhD, Evan Alexandrou RN, PhD, Marghie Murgo RN, MCritCareNurs, John R. Gowardman MBChB, FCICM, FRACP, Adrian Regli MD, PhD, FCICM, Claire M. Rickard RN, PhD
{"title":"Incidence and risk factors for central venous access device failure in hospitalized adults: A multivariable analysis of 1892 catheters","authors":"Amanda Corley RN, MAdvPrac, PhD,&nbsp;Ruth H. Royle RN, MEcon,&nbsp;Nicole Marsh RN, MAdvPrac, PhD,&nbsp;Emily N. Larsen RN, GDipHlthRes, PhD (Cand),&nbsp;E. Geoffrey Playford MBBS (Hons), MMed (Clin Epi), PhD, FRACP, FRCPA,&nbsp;Matthew R. McGrail PhD,&nbsp;Naomi Runnegar MBBS, FRACP, FRCPA,&nbsp;Robert S. Ware BSc, PhD,&nbsp;Nicole C. Gavin RN, MAdvPrac, PhD,&nbsp;Evan Alexandrou RN, PhD,&nbsp;Marghie Murgo RN, MCritCareNurs,&nbsp;John R. Gowardman MBChB, FCICM, FRACP,&nbsp;Adrian Regli MD, PhD, FCICM,&nbsp;Claire M. Rickard RN, PhD","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Central venous access devices (CVADs) allow intravenous therapy, haemodynamic monitoring and blood sampling but many fail before therapy completion.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To quantify CVAD failure and complications; and identify risk factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Designs, Settings, and Participants</h3>\n \n <p>Secondary analysis of multicentre randomised controlled trial including patients aged ≥16 years with a non-tunnelled CVAD (NTCVAD), peripherally-inserted central catheter (PICC) or tunnelled CVAD (TCVAD). Primary outcome was incidence of all-cause CVAD failure (central line-associated bloodstream infection [CLABSI], occlusion, accidental dislodgement, catheter fracture, thrombosis, pain). Secondary outcomes were CLABSI, occlusion and dislodgement. Cox regression was used to report time-to-event associations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In 1892 CVADs, all-cause failure occurred in 10.2% of devices: 49 NTCVADs (6.1%); 100 PICCs (13.2%); 44 TCVADs (13.4%). Failure rates for CLABSI, occlusion and dislodgement were 5.3%, 1.8%, and 1.7%, respectively. Independent CLABSI predictors were blood product administration through PICCs (hazard ratio (HR) 2.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24–5.55); and in TCVADs, one or two lumens, compared with three to four (HR 3.36, 95%CI 1.68–6.71), intravenous chemotherapy (HR 2.96, 95%CI 1.31–6.68), and diabetes (HR 3.25, 95%CI 1.40–7.57). Independent factors protective for CLABSI include antimicrobial NTCVADs (HR 0.23, 95%CI 0.08–0.63) and lipids in TCVADs (HR 0.32, 95%CI 0.14–0.72). NTCVADs inserted at another hospital (HR 7.06, 95%CI 1.48–33.7) and baseline infection in patients with PICCs (HR 2.72, 95%CI 1.08–6.83) were predictors for dislodgement. No independent occlusion predictors were found. Modifiable risk factors were identified for CVAD failure, which occurred for 1-in-10 catheters. Strict infection prevention measures and improved CVAD securement could reduce CLABSI and dislodgement risk.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":"19 10","pages":"905-917"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jhm.13414","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhm.13414","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Central venous access devices (CVADs) allow intravenous therapy, haemodynamic monitoring and blood sampling but many fail before therapy completion.

Objective

To quantify CVAD failure and complications; and identify risk factors.

Designs, Settings, and Participants

Secondary analysis of multicentre randomised controlled trial including patients aged ≥16 years with a non-tunnelled CVAD (NTCVAD), peripherally-inserted central catheter (PICC) or tunnelled CVAD (TCVAD). Primary outcome was incidence of all-cause CVAD failure (central line-associated bloodstream infection [CLABSI], occlusion, accidental dislodgement, catheter fracture, thrombosis, pain). Secondary outcomes were CLABSI, occlusion and dislodgement. Cox regression was used to report time-to-event associations.

Results

In 1892 CVADs, all-cause failure occurred in 10.2% of devices: 49 NTCVADs (6.1%); 100 PICCs (13.2%); 44 TCVADs (13.4%). Failure rates for CLABSI, occlusion and dislodgement were 5.3%, 1.8%, and 1.7%, respectively. Independent CLABSI predictors were blood product administration through PICCs (hazard ratio (HR) 2.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24–5.55); and in TCVADs, one or two lumens, compared with three to four (HR 3.36, 95%CI 1.68–6.71), intravenous chemotherapy (HR 2.96, 95%CI 1.31–6.68), and diabetes (HR 3.25, 95%CI 1.40–7.57). Independent factors protective for CLABSI include antimicrobial NTCVADs (HR 0.23, 95%CI 0.08–0.63) and lipids in TCVADs (HR 0.32, 95%CI 0.14–0.72). NTCVADs inserted at another hospital (HR 7.06, 95%CI 1.48–33.7) and baseline infection in patients with PICCs (HR 2.72, 95%CI 1.08–6.83) were predictors for dislodgement. No independent occlusion predictors were found. Modifiable risk factors were identified for CVAD failure, which occurred for 1-in-10 catheters. Strict infection prevention measures and improved CVAD securement could reduce CLABSI and dislodgement risk.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住院成人中心静脉通路装置故障的发生率和风险因素:对 1892 个导管的多变量分析。
背景中心静脉通路装置(CVAD)可用于静脉治疗、血流动力学监测和血液采样,但许多装置在治疗完成前就已失效:量化 CVAD 的故障和并发症,并确定风险因素:多中心随机对照试验的二次分析,包括年龄≥16 岁、使用非隧道式 CVAD(NTCVAD)、外周置入中心导管(PICC)或隧道式 CVAD(TCVAD)的患者。主要结果是全因 CVAD 故障(中心静脉相关血流感染 [CLABSI]、闭塞、意外脱落、导管断裂、血栓形成、疼痛)的发生率。次要结果为 CLABSI、闭塞和脱落。Cox回归用于报告时间到事件之间的关联:结果:在 1892 台 CVAD 中,10.2% 的设备发生了全因故障:49台NTCVAD(6.1%);100台PICC(13.2%);44台TCVAD(13.4%)。CLABSI、闭塞和脱落的失败率分别为 5.3%、1.8% 和 1.7%。预测 CLABSI 的独立因素包括:通过 PICC 给血制品(危险比 (HR) 2.62,95% 置信区间 (CI):1.24-5.55);TCVAD 只有一个或两个管腔,而 TCVAD 有三到四个管腔(HR:3.36,95% 置信区间 (CI):1.68-6.71);静脉化疗(HR:2.96,95% 置信区间 (CI):1.31-6.68);糖尿病(HR:3.25,95% 置信区间 (CI):1.40-7.57)。CLABSI的独立保护因素包括抗菌NTCVAD(HR 0.23,95%CI 0.08-0.63)和TCVAD中的脂质(HR 0.32,95%CI 0.14-0.72)。在其他医院插入的 NTCVAD(HR 7.06,95%CI 1.48-33.7)和 PICC 患者的基线感染(HR 2.72,95%CI 1.08-6.83)是脱落的预测因素。没有发现独立的闭塞预测因素。CVAD 失效的可改变风险因素已经确定,每 10 个导管中就有 1 个发生失效。严格的感染预防措施和改进的 CVAD 固定可降低 CLABSI 和脱落风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of hospital medicine
Journal of hospital medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
11.50%
发文量
233
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JHM is a peer-reviewed publication of the Society of Hospital Medicine and is published 12 times per year. JHM publishes manuscripts that address the care of hospitalized adults or children. Broad areas of interest include (1) Treatments for common inpatient conditions; (2) Approaches to improving perioperative care; (3) Improving care for hospitalized patients with geriatric or pediatric vulnerabilities (such as mobility problems, or those with complex longitudinal care); (4) Evaluation of innovative healthcare delivery or educational models; (5) Approaches to improving the quality, safety, and value of healthcare across the acute- and postacute-continuum of care; and (6) Evaluation of policy and payment changes that affect hospital and postacute care.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information On healing and humanity Issue Information Issue Information Leadership & professional development: From setback to setup
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1