Role of preservation methods using deep-freezing and liquid nitrogen in bone allograft characteristics: An in vitro study.

Narra J Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-29 DOI:10.52225/narra.v4i1.757
Rizal A Lisan, Ferdiansyah Mahyudin, Mouli Edward, Dewan S Buwana
{"title":"Role of preservation methods using deep-freezing and liquid nitrogen in bone allograft characteristics: An in vitro study.","authors":"Rizal A Lisan, Ferdiansyah Mahyudin, Mouli Edward, Dewan S Buwana","doi":"10.52225/narra.v4i1.757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bone grafting has emerged as a key solution in bone defect management such as allograft, graft of bone from another individual. However, bone allografts usually undergo rigorous preparation to eliminate immune-triggering elements. The deep-freezing methods may delay graft use, while cryopreservation using liquid nitrogen allows rapid freezing but may alter graft characteristics. The aim of this study was to investigate the post-preservation changes in bone allograft characteristics and to compare the effectiveness of deep-freezing and liquid nitrogen methods using animal model. An experimental study using a post-test only control group design was conducted. Fresh-frozen femoral cortical bone was obtained from male New Zealand white rabbits. Preservation by deep-freezing involved placing bone samples in a -80°C freezer for 30 days. For liquid nitrogen preservation, bone grafts were immersed in liquid nitrogen for 20 min, followed by a 15-min rest at room temperature and a final immersion in 0.9% sodium chloride at 30°C for 15 min. Bone samples then underwent evaluation of cell viability, compression, and bending tests. Cell viability test employed the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and the compression and bending tests used the Universal Testing Machine (UTM). Independent Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the methods as appropriate. Our study found that the use of deep-freezing and liquid nitrogen resulted in similar outcomes for cell viability, compression, and bending tests, with <i>p</i>-values of 0.302, 0.745, and 0.512, respectively. Further exploration with larger sample sizes may help to optimize the methods for specific applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":517416,"journal":{"name":"Narra J","volume":"4 1","pages":"e757"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11125383/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Narra J","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52225/narra.v4i1.757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bone grafting has emerged as a key solution in bone defect management such as allograft, graft of bone from another individual. However, bone allografts usually undergo rigorous preparation to eliminate immune-triggering elements. The deep-freezing methods may delay graft use, while cryopreservation using liquid nitrogen allows rapid freezing but may alter graft characteristics. The aim of this study was to investigate the post-preservation changes in bone allograft characteristics and to compare the effectiveness of deep-freezing and liquid nitrogen methods using animal model. An experimental study using a post-test only control group design was conducted. Fresh-frozen femoral cortical bone was obtained from male New Zealand white rabbits. Preservation by deep-freezing involved placing bone samples in a -80°C freezer for 30 days. For liquid nitrogen preservation, bone grafts were immersed in liquid nitrogen for 20 min, followed by a 15-min rest at room temperature and a final immersion in 0.9% sodium chloride at 30°C for 15 min. Bone samples then underwent evaluation of cell viability, compression, and bending tests. Cell viability test employed the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and the compression and bending tests used the Universal Testing Machine (UTM). Independent Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the methods as appropriate. Our study found that the use of deep-freezing and liquid nitrogen resulted in similar outcomes for cell viability, compression, and bending tests, with p-values of 0.302, 0.745, and 0.512, respectively. Further exploration with larger sample sizes may help to optimize the methods for specific applications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用深冻和液氮保存方法对骨异体移植特性的影响:体外研究
骨移植已成为骨缺损治疗的一个重要解决方案,例如异体骨移植,即从他人身上移植骨。然而,骨异体移植通常要经过严格的准备过程,以消除引发免疫的因素。深度冷冻方法可能会延迟移植物的使用,而使用液氮进行低温保存可以快速冷冻,但可能会改变移植物的特性。本研究旨在利用动物模型研究骨异体移植物保存后的特性变化,并比较深冻法和液氮法的有效性。本研究采用实验组设计,仅进行后期测试。新鲜冷冻的股骨皮质骨取自雄性新西兰白兔。深冷保存法是将骨样本放入零下 80°C 的冷冻箱中冷冻 30 天。液氮保存时,将骨移植物在液氮中浸泡 20 分钟,然后在室温下静置 15 分钟,最后在 30°C 的 0.9% 氯化钠中浸泡 15 分钟。然后对骨样本进行细胞活力评估、压缩和弯曲测试。细胞活力测试采用 3-(4,5-二甲基噻唑-2-基)-2,5-二苯基-2H-溴化四氮唑(MTT)测定法,压缩和弯曲测试采用万能试验机(UTM)。根据情况使用独立学生 t 检验或 Mann-Whitney U 检验对各种方法进行比较。我们的研究发现,使用深冻和液氮进行细胞活力、压缩和弯曲测试的结果相似,P 值分别为 0.302、0.745 和 0.512。利用更大的样本量进行进一步探索,可能有助于针对特定应用优化方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In silico analysis of Arbacia lixula-derived peptides and plasmid construction for recombinant anti-aging therapies. Development of the Indonesian sexual quality of life scale for women (ISQOL-W). Integrating epigenetic modification and stem cell therapy strategies: A novel approach for advancing Alzheimer's disease treatment - A literature review. Diagnostic accuracy of urinary cytokeratin fragment-19 (CYFRA21-1) for bladder cancer. Inhibition of B-cell activating factor activity using active compounds from Physalis angulata in the mechanism of nephrotic syndrome improvement: A computational approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1