Examining pancreatic stone protein response in ICU-acquired bloodstream infections: a matched event analysis.

IF 2.8 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Intensive Care Medicine Experimental Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1186/s40635-024-00634-7
Diede Verlaan, Lennie P G Derde, Tom van der Poll, Marc J M Bonten, Olaf L Cremer
{"title":"Examining pancreatic stone protein response in ICU-acquired bloodstream infections: a matched event analysis.","authors":"Diede Verlaan, Lennie P G Derde, Tom van der Poll, Marc J M Bonten, Olaf L Cremer","doi":"10.1186/s40635-024-00634-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pancreatic stone protein (PSP) exhibits potential as a plasma biomarker for infection diagnosis and risk stratification in critically ill patients, but its significance in nosocomial infection and intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired bloodstream infection (BSI) remains unclear. This study explores the temporal responses of PSP in ICU-acquired BSI caused by different pathogens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From a large cohort of ICU patients, we selected episodes of ICU-acquired BSI caused by Gram-negative rods (GNRs), enterococci, or Candida species. Events were matched on length of ICU stay at infection onset, Severe Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, presence of immune deficiency, and use of renal replacement therapy. PSP concentrations were measured at infection onset (T0) and at 24, 48 and 72 h prior to infection onset as defined by the first occurrence of a positive blood culture. Absolute and trend differences in PSP levels between pathogen groups were analysed using one-way analysis of variance. Sensitivity analyses were performed in events with a new or worsening systematic inflammatory response based on C-reactive protein, white cell count and fever.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analysed 30 BSI cases per pathogen group. Median (IQR) BSI onset was on day 9 (6-12). Overall, PSP levels were high (381 (237-539) ng/ml), with 18% of values exceeding the assay's measurement range. Across all 90 BSI cases, there was no clear trend over time (median change 34 (- 75-189) ng/ml from T-72 to T0). PSP concentrations at infection onset were 406 (229-497), 350 (223-608), and 480 (327-965) ng/ml, for GNR, enterococci, and Candida species, respectively (p = 0.32). At every time point, absolute PSP levels and trends did not differ significantly between pathogens. PSP values at T0 correlated with SOFA scores. Eighteen (20%) of 90 BSI events did not exhibit a systemic inflammatory response, primarily in Candida species. No clear change in PSP concentration before BSI onset or between-group differences were found in sensitivity analyses of 72 cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Against a background of overall (very) high plasma PSP levels in critically ill patients, we did not find clear temporal patterns or any pathogen-specific differences in PSP response in the days preceding onset of ICU-acquired BSI.</p>","PeriodicalId":13750,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","volume":"12 1","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11133278/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-024-00634-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pancreatic stone protein (PSP) exhibits potential as a plasma biomarker for infection diagnosis and risk stratification in critically ill patients, but its significance in nosocomial infection and intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired bloodstream infection (BSI) remains unclear. This study explores the temporal responses of PSP in ICU-acquired BSI caused by different pathogens.

Methods: From a large cohort of ICU patients, we selected episodes of ICU-acquired BSI caused by Gram-negative rods (GNRs), enterococci, or Candida species. Events were matched on length of ICU stay at infection onset, Severe Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, presence of immune deficiency, and use of renal replacement therapy. PSP concentrations were measured at infection onset (T0) and at 24, 48 and 72 h prior to infection onset as defined by the first occurrence of a positive blood culture. Absolute and trend differences in PSP levels between pathogen groups were analysed using one-way analysis of variance. Sensitivity analyses were performed in events with a new or worsening systematic inflammatory response based on C-reactive protein, white cell count and fever.

Results: We analysed 30 BSI cases per pathogen group. Median (IQR) BSI onset was on day 9 (6-12). Overall, PSP levels were high (381 (237-539) ng/ml), with 18% of values exceeding the assay's measurement range. Across all 90 BSI cases, there was no clear trend over time (median change 34 (- 75-189) ng/ml from T-72 to T0). PSP concentrations at infection onset were 406 (229-497), 350 (223-608), and 480 (327-965) ng/ml, for GNR, enterococci, and Candida species, respectively (p = 0.32). At every time point, absolute PSP levels and trends did not differ significantly between pathogens. PSP values at T0 correlated with SOFA scores. Eighteen (20%) of 90 BSI events did not exhibit a systemic inflammatory response, primarily in Candida species. No clear change in PSP concentration before BSI onset or between-group differences were found in sensitivity analyses of 72 cases.

Conclusions: Against a background of overall (very) high plasma PSP levels in critically ill patients, we did not find clear temporal patterns or any pathogen-specific differences in PSP response in the days preceding onset of ICU-acquired BSI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究 ICU 获得性血流感染中的胰石蛋白反应:匹配事件分析。
背景:胰石蛋白(PSP)是一种潜在的血浆生物标志物,可用于重症患者的感染诊断和风险分层,但其在院内感染和重症监护病房(ICU)获得性血流感染(BSI)中的意义仍不明确。本研究探讨了 PSP 在不同病原体引起的 ICU 获得性 BSI 中的时间反应:我们从一大批 ICU 患者中挑选了由革兰氏阴性杆菌(GNRs)、肠球菌或念珠菌引起的 ICU 获得性 BSI 病例。根据感染发生时的重症监护室住院时间、严重器官功能衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、是否存在免疫缺陷以及是否使用肾脏替代疗法等因素对事件进行匹配。在感染发生时(T0)、感染发生前 24、48 和 72 小时(以首次出现血液培养阳性为界)测量 PSP 浓度。采用单因素方差分析法分析病原体组间 PSP 水平的绝对差异和趋势差异。根据 C 反应蛋白、白细胞计数和发热情况,对出现新的或恶化的系统性炎症反应的病例进行敏感性分析:我们对每个病原体组的 30 个 BSI 病例进行了分析。BSI发病时间中位数(IQR)为第9天(6-12天)。总体而言,PSP水平较高(381(237-539)纳克/毫升),18%的数值超过了检测范围。在所有 90 个 BSI 病例中,没有明显的时间变化趋势(从 T-72 到 T0 的中位变化为 34 (- 75-189) 纳克/毫升)。感染开始时,GNR、肠球菌和念珠菌的 PSP 浓度分别为 406(229-497)、350(223-608)和 480(327-965)纳克/毫升(P = 0.32)。在每个时间点,不同病原体的 PSP 绝对水平和趋势均无显著差异。T0 时的 PSP 值与 SOFA 评分相关。90 例 BSI 事件中有 18 例(20%)未出现全身炎症反应,主要是念珠菌感染。在对 72 例病例进行的敏感性分析中,未发现 BSI 发病前 PSP 浓度有明显变化,也未发现组间差异:结论:在重症患者血浆 PSP 整体(非常)高水平的背景下,我们没有发现 ICU 感染 BSI 发病前几天 PSP 反应的明确时间模式或任何病原体特异性差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Predictors of intradialytic hypotension in critically ill patients undergoing kidney replacement therapy: a systematic review. Is passive leg raising clinically useful in predicting intradialytic hypotension? Largely ignored-but pathogenetically significant: ambient temperature in rodent sepsis models. The development of a C5.0 machine learning model in a limited data set to predict early mortality in patients with ARDS undergoing an initial session of prone positioning. A new method to predict return of spontaneous circulation by peripheral intravenous analysis during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a rat model pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1