Ciera L. Bartholomew, Catia Martins, Barbara Gower
{"title":"Association between insulin sensitivity and lean mass loss during weight loss","authors":"Ciera L. Bartholomew, Catia Martins, Barbara Gower","doi":"10.1002/oby.24022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The study objective was to assess the relationship between insulin sensitivity and changes in total lean mass (LM) and appendicular LM (ALM) during weight loss.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Individuals were randomly assigned to either a standard or a moderately reduced carbohydrate diet for 16 weeks. Body composition was assessed using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and insulin sensitivity index (S<sub>I</sub>) using an intravenous glucose tolerance test. Multiple linear regression was used to determine whether baseline S<sub>I</sub> was predictive of changes in total LM and ALM.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Participants (<i>n</i> = 57; baseline BMI 32.1 ± 3.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) lost an average of 6.8 ± 3.2 kg of body weight (<i>p</i> < 0.001), with 1.5 ± 2.6 kg coming from LM (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and 0.5 ± 0.73 kg from ALM (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that S<sub>I</sub> was inversely associated with changes in total LM (kilograms; β = 0.481, <i>p</i> < 0.001), after adjusting for baseline LM, fat mass, acute insulin response to glucose, and weight loss. Similar results were seen when assessing ALM loss (β = 0.359, <i>p</i> < 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Identifying individuals with low insulin sensitivity prior to weight loss interventions may allow for a personalized approach aiming at minimizing LM loss.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":215,"journal":{"name":"Obesity","volume":"32 6","pages":"1156-1162"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/oby.24022","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oby.24022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
The study objective was to assess the relationship between insulin sensitivity and changes in total lean mass (LM) and appendicular LM (ALM) during weight loss.
Methods
Individuals were randomly assigned to either a standard or a moderately reduced carbohydrate diet for 16 weeks. Body composition was assessed using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and insulin sensitivity index (SI) using an intravenous glucose tolerance test. Multiple linear regression was used to determine whether baseline SI was predictive of changes in total LM and ALM.
Results
Participants (n = 57; baseline BMI 32.1 ± 3.8 kg/m2) lost an average of 6.8 ± 3.2 kg of body weight (p < 0.001), with 1.5 ± 2.6 kg coming from LM (p < 0.05) and 0.5 ± 0.73 kg from ALM (p < 0.05). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that SI was inversely associated with changes in total LM (kilograms; β = 0.481, p < 0.001), after adjusting for baseline LM, fat mass, acute insulin response to glucose, and weight loss. Similar results were seen when assessing ALM loss (β = 0.359, p < 0.05).
Conclusions
Identifying individuals with low insulin sensitivity prior to weight loss interventions may allow for a personalized approach aiming at minimizing LM loss.
期刊介绍:
Obesity is the official journal of The Obesity Society and is the premier source of information for increasing knowledge, fostering translational research from basic to population science, and promoting better treatment for people with obesity. Obesity publishes important peer-reviewed research and cutting-edge reviews, commentaries, and public health and medical developments.