Optimal use of antithrombotic agents in recent small subcortical strokes accompanied by atrial fibrillation.

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Stroke Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1177/23969873241253958
Minwoo Lee, Mi-Sun Oh, Kyung-Ho Yu, Chulho Kim, Jong-Hee Sohn, Hee-Jung Mo, Yerim Kim, Sang-Hwa Lee
{"title":"Optimal use of antithrombotic agents in recent small subcortical strokes accompanied by atrial fibrillation.","authors":"Minwoo Lee, Mi-Sun Oh, Kyung-Ho Yu, Chulho Kim, Jong-Hee Sohn, Hee-Jung Mo, Yerim Kim, Sang-Hwa Lee","doi":"10.1177/23969873241253958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anticoagulants (AC) and antiplatelets (APT) in patients with recent small subcortical infarctions (RSSI) and atrial fibrillation (AF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized a prospective multicenter stroke registry database to identify patients with RSSI with a concurrent diagnosis of AF. Propensity score matching analysis was used to balance baseline differences among the AC-only, APT-only, and their combination groups. The main outcomes of interest were time to occurrence of minor and major bleeding, stroke recurrence, and all-cause mortality. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each outcome were calculated using the multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 404 eligible patients, 28.2% received APT only, 53.0% received AC only, and 18.9% received a combination of both. Notable differences were observed between these groups in terms of the 1-year stroke recurrence (APT, 32.5%; AC, 5.6%; APT + AC, 9.2%) and all-cause mortality (APT, 21.9%; AC, 6.1%; APT + AC, 14.5%), whereas the rates of bleeding events were comparable. The multivariable analysis indicated a significant association of AC alone with reduced risks of severe bleeding, stroke recurrence, and all-cause mortality compared with APT alone (aHR 0.64, 95% CI 0.41-0.98; aHR 0.11, 95% CI 0.06-0.22; aHR 0.22, 95% CI 0.11-0.44, respectively). The combination group showed a reduced risk of stroke recurrence compared to APT alone (aHR 0.19, 95% CI 0.08-0.46). These findings remained consistent with the propensity score-matched analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AC showed better clinical outcomes than APT in patients with RSSI and AF. Additionally, combination therapy with AC and APT was associated with a lower risk of stroke recurrence than APT alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":" ","pages":"981-988"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569447/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Stroke Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23969873241253958","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anticoagulants (AC) and antiplatelets (APT) in patients with recent small subcortical infarctions (RSSI) and atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods: We utilized a prospective multicenter stroke registry database to identify patients with RSSI with a concurrent diagnosis of AF. Propensity score matching analysis was used to balance baseline differences among the AC-only, APT-only, and their combination groups. The main outcomes of interest were time to occurrence of minor and major bleeding, stroke recurrence, and all-cause mortality. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each outcome were calculated using the multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.

Results: Of the 404 eligible patients, 28.2% received APT only, 53.0% received AC only, and 18.9% received a combination of both. Notable differences were observed between these groups in terms of the 1-year stroke recurrence (APT, 32.5%; AC, 5.6%; APT + AC, 9.2%) and all-cause mortality (APT, 21.9%; AC, 6.1%; APT + AC, 14.5%), whereas the rates of bleeding events were comparable. The multivariable analysis indicated a significant association of AC alone with reduced risks of severe bleeding, stroke recurrence, and all-cause mortality compared with APT alone (aHR 0.64, 95% CI 0.41-0.98; aHR 0.11, 95% CI 0.06-0.22; aHR 0.22, 95% CI 0.11-0.44, respectively). The combination group showed a reduced risk of stroke recurrence compared to APT alone (aHR 0.19, 95% CI 0.08-0.46). These findings remained consistent with the propensity score-matched analysis.

Conclusion: AC showed better clinical outcomes than APT in patients with RSSI and AF. Additionally, combination therapy with AC and APT was associated with a lower risk of stroke recurrence than APT alone.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
近期伴有心房颤动的小型皮层下中风患者抗血栓药物的最佳使用方法。
研究背景本研究旨在评估抗凝药物(AC)和抗血小板药物(APT)在近期皮层下小梗死(RSSI)和房颤(AF)患者中的有效性和安全性:我们利用前瞻性多中心卒中登记数据库识别了同时诊断为房颤的 RSSI 患者。我们采用倾向评分匹配分析来平衡纯 AC 组、纯 APT 组及其组合组之间的基线差异。主要研究结果为轻微和大出血发生时间、中风复发率和全因死亡率。采用多变量考克斯比例危险回归分析法计算了每种结果的调整危险比(aHRs)和95%置信区间(CIs):在 404 名符合条件的患者中,28.2% 的患者只接受了 APT,53.0% 的患者只接受了 AC,18.9% 的患者同时接受了 APT 和 AC。这两组患者在 1 年中风复发率(APT,32.5%;AC,5.6%;APT + AC,9.2%)和全因死亡率(APT,21.9%;AC,6.1%;APT + AC,14.5%)方面存在显著差异,而出血事件发生率则相当。多变量分析表明,与单用 APT 相比,单用 AC 可显著降低严重出血、中风复发和全因死亡的风险(aHR 0.64,95% CI 0.41-0.98;aHR 0.11,95% CI 0.06-0.22;aHR 0.22,95% CI 0.11-0.44)。与单用 APT 相比,联合用药组卒中复发风险降低(aHR 0.19,95% CI 0.08-0.46)。这些结果与倾向评分匹配分析结果保持一致:在RSSI和房颤患者中,AC的临床疗效优于APT。结论:在 RSSI 和房颤患者中,AC 的临床疗效优于 APT。此外,AC 和 APT 联合治疗的中风复发风险低于 APT 单独治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.60%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: Launched in 2016 the European Stroke Journal (ESJ) is the official journal of the European Stroke Organisation (ESO), a professional non-profit organization with over 1,400 individual members, and affiliations to numerous related national and international societies. ESJ covers clinical stroke research from all fields, including clinical trials, epidemiology, primary and secondary prevention, diagnosis, acute and post-acute management, guidelines, translation of experimental findings into clinical practice, rehabilitation, organisation of stroke care, and societal impact. It is open to authors from all relevant medical and health professions. Article types include review articles, original research, protocols, guidelines, editorials and letters to the Editor. Through ESJ, authors and researchers have gained a new platform for the rapid and professional publication of peer reviewed scientific material of the highest standards; publication in ESJ is highly competitive. The journal and its editorial team has developed excellent cooperation with sister organisations such as the World Stroke Organisation and the International Journal of Stroke, and the American Heart Organization/American Stroke Association and the journal Stroke. ESJ is fully peer-reviewed and is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Issues are published 4 times a year (March, June, September and December) and articles are published OnlineFirst prior to issue publication.
期刊最新文献
Etiologic subtypes of first and recurrent ischemic stroke in young patients using A-S-C-O and TOAST classification criteria: A retrospective follow-up study. Quality of early stroke care and long-term mortality in patients with acute stroke: A nationwide follow-up study. Biomarkers to improve functional outcome prediction after ischemic stroke: Results from the SICFAIL, STRAWINSKI, and PREDICT studies. Epidemiology of transient ischemic attack in the Normandy Stroke population-based study. EnDovascular therapy plus best medical treatment (BMT) versus BMT alone for medIum distal veSsel occlusion sTroke (DISTAL): An international, multicentre, randomized-controlled, two-arm, assessor-blinded trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1