Parkinson's Disease: Coping Strategies, Cognitive Restructuring and Deep Brain Stimulation.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-27 DOI:10.1177/08919887241248831
Mylène Meyer, Sébastien Montel, Sophie Colnat-Coulbois, Solène Frismand, Pierre-Michel Llorca, Pierre Vidailhet, Raymund Schwan, Elisabeth Spitz
{"title":"Parkinson's Disease: Coping Strategies, Cognitive Restructuring and Deep Brain Stimulation.","authors":"Mylène Meyer, Sébastien Montel, Sophie Colnat-Coulbois, Solène Frismand, Pierre-Michel Llorca, Pierre Vidailhet, Raymund Schwan, Elisabeth Spitz","doi":"10.1177/08919887241248831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Less is known concerning the evolution of coping strategies before and after deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a randomized controlled trial, coping was measured with the neurological version of the CHIP (Coping with Health Injuries and Problem) and the BriefCOPE in PD patients before ( T1: DBS - 2 months) and after (T2: + 3 months, T3: + 6 months) DBS. Patients (N = 50, age 59 ± 5.7 years, disease duration 9.54 ± 3.7 years) were randomised in 3 groups: CRTG (preoperative psychological preparation with cognitive restructuring), PIG (preoperative non structured interviews), and CG (no psychological preparation).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Coping strategies are modulated by the time of evaluation. Some strategies are significantly more used preoperatively than postoperatively, as strategies about the research for information (CHIP: F = 16.14; <i>P</i> = .000; η<sup>2</sup> = .095; BriefCOPE F = 5.71; <i>P</i> = .005; η<sup>2</sup> = .066), emotional regulation (F = 3.29; <i>P</i> = .042; η<sup>2</sup> = .029), and well-being searching (F = 4.59; <i>P</i> = .013; η<sup>2</sup> = .043). Some other strategies appear more used post than preoperatively, as palliative coping (F = 5.57; <i>P</i> = .005; η<sup>2</sup> = .064), humour (F = 3.35; <i>P</i> = .041; η<sup>2</sup> = .0.35), and use of substance (F = 4.43; <i>P</i> = .015; η<sup>2</sup> = .070). No other specific time, group or time per group interaction effect was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Coping strategies are crucial for PD patients to adapt to the evolution of their parkinsonian state. Their consideration should be more systematic in the neurosurgical process, particularly when neurological symptoms would remain after DBS. More insights are needed concerning the evolution of coping strategies through DBS and the impact of a preoperative psychotherapy over them in preoperative PD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"448-460"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887241248831","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Less is known concerning the evolution of coping strategies before and after deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients.

Methods: In a randomized controlled trial, coping was measured with the neurological version of the CHIP (Coping with Health Injuries and Problem) and the BriefCOPE in PD patients before ( T1: DBS - 2 months) and after (T2: + 3 months, T3: + 6 months) DBS. Patients (N = 50, age 59 ± 5.7 years, disease duration 9.54 ± 3.7 years) were randomised in 3 groups: CRTG (preoperative psychological preparation with cognitive restructuring), PIG (preoperative non structured interviews), and CG (no psychological preparation).

Results: Coping strategies are modulated by the time of evaluation. Some strategies are significantly more used preoperatively than postoperatively, as strategies about the research for information (CHIP: F = 16.14; P = .000; η2 = .095; BriefCOPE F = 5.71; P = .005; η2 = .066), emotional regulation (F = 3.29; P = .042; η2 = .029), and well-being searching (F = 4.59; P = .013; η2 = .043). Some other strategies appear more used post than preoperatively, as palliative coping (F = 5.57; P = .005; η2 = .064), humour (F = 3.35; P = .041; η2 = .0.35), and use of substance (F = 4.43; P = .015; η2 = .070). No other specific time, group or time per group interaction effect was found.

Conclusion: Coping strategies are crucial for PD patients to adapt to the evolution of their parkinsonian state. Their consideration should be more systematic in the neurosurgical process, particularly when neurological symptoms would remain after DBS. More insights are needed concerning the evolution of coping strategies through DBS and the impact of a preoperative psychotherapy over them in preoperative PD patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
帕金森病:应对策略、认知重组和深部脑刺激。
摘要帕金森病(PD)患者在接受深部脑刺激(DBS)前后的应对策略演变情况鲜为人知:在一项随机对照试验中,使用CHIP(应对健康伤害和问题)神经系统版和BriefCOPE对帕金森病患者在脑深部刺激前(T1:脑深部刺激-2个月)和脑深部刺激后(T2:+3个月、T3:+6个月)的应对策略进行了测量。患者(N = 50,年龄 59 ± 5.7 岁,病程 9.54 ± 3.7 年)被随机分为 3 组:CRTG组(术前心理准备与认知重组)、PIG组(术前非结构化访谈)和CG组(无心理准备):应对策略受评估时间的影响。有些策略在术前比术后明显更常用,如信息研究策略(CHIP:F = 16.14;P = .000;η2 = .095;BriefCOPE F = 5.71;P = .005;η2 = .066)、情绪调节策略(F = 3.29;P = .042;η2 = .029)和幸福搜索策略(F = 4.59;P = .013;η2 = .043)。其他一些策略似乎在术后比术前使用得更多,如缓和应对(F = 5.57;P = .005;η2 = .064)、幽默(F = 3.35;P = .041;η2 = .0.35)和使用药物(F = 4.43;P = .015;η2 = .070)。没有发现其他特定时间、组别或每组时间的交互效应:应对策略对于帕金森病患者适应帕金森病状态的演变至关重要。在神经外科治疗过程中,尤其是在 DBS 治疗后仍有神经症状时,应对策略的考虑应更加系统化。关于应对策略通过 DBS 的演变,以及术前心理治疗对术前帕金森病患者应对策略的影响,还需要更多的深入了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology (JGP) brings together original research, clinical reviews, and timely case reports on neuropsychiatric care of aging patients, including age-related biologic, neurologic, and psychiatric illnesses; psychosocial problems; forensic issues; and family care. The journal offers the latest peer-reviewed information on cognitive, mood, anxiety, addictive, and sleep disorders in older patients, as well as tested diagnostic tools and therapies.
期刊最新文献
Neurofilament Light Chain as a Biomarker of Global Cognition in Individuals With Possible Vascular Mild Cognitive Impairment. Neuropsychiatric Comorbidities and Psychotropic Medication Use in Medicare Beneficiaries With Dementia by Sex and Race. Greater Apathy Associated With Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Use in Parkinson's Disease. Clinical Staging for Personality Disorders in Older Adults. A Comparison of Test-Retest Reliability and Practice Effects of Short Portable Mental State Questionnaire and Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Patients with Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1