Supratherapeutic INR During Treatment With Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir and Warfarin and Acute Illness With COVID-19: A Case Report.

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of pharmacy practice Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-27 DOI:10.1177/08971900241257296
Caitlin Dowd-Green, Dannielle Brown, Alexandra Wilson, Michael Streiff
{"title":"Supratherapeutic INR During Treatment With Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir and Warfarin and Acute Illness With COVID-19: A Case Report.","authors":"Caitlin Dowd-Green, Dannielle Brown, Alexandra Wilson, Michael Streiff","doi":"10.1177/08971900241257296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Several studies have examined INR fluctuations using pharmacokinetic (PK) models or post-hoc INR values after completing nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, but further study of the effects of the drug interaction with warfarin during treatment is necessary. <b>Case Summary</b>: Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is largely utilized in the outpatient setting so data regarding INR trends in hospitalized patients on warfarin is limited. However, many who receive nirmatrelvir/ritonavir outpatient experience difficulty with presenting to clinic for INR checks due to feeling acutely ill along with isolation precautions. We present the case of a patient receiving warfarin and utilizing home INR testing for monitoring. After diagnosis of coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19), she was started on nirmatrelvir/ritonavir on day five after testing positive. Most recent INR prior to the start of therapy was 2.7 and had been stable on the same dose for months prior to infection. On day two of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, her INR rose to 4.0 on home point of care INR testing. Despite reducing her dose of warfarin by 15%, her INR remained supratherapeutic the day after completing nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (4.0) and for several checks after. One month after completion of therapy, her INR returned to therapeutic levels. <b>Practice Implications</b>: While PK models and case series have hypothesized both potential increases or decreases in INR with the nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and warfarin interaction, COVID-19 infection itself can cause several pharmacodynamic changes which can increase INR, including decreased appetite and, in severe cases, organ dysfunction. This case provides real-world insight into the drug interaction between nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and the drug-disease state interaction between warfarin and COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"1414-1418"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900241257296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several studies have examined INR fluctuations using pharmacokinetic (PK) models or post-hoc INR values after completing nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, but further study of the effects of the drug interaction with warfarin during treatment is necessary. Case Summary: Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is largely utilized in the outpatient setting so data regarding INR trends in hospitalized patients on warfarin is limited. However, many who receive nirmatrelvir/ritonavir outpatient experience difficulty with presenting to clinic for INR checks due to feeling acutely ill along with isolation precautions. We present the case of a patient receiving warfarin and utilizing home INR testing for monitoring. After diagnosis of coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19), she was started on nirmatrelvir/ritonavir on day five after testing positive. Most recent INR prior to the start of therapy was 2.7 and had been stable on the same dose for months prior to infection. On day two of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, her INR rose to 4.0 on home point of care INR testing. Despite reducing her dose of warfarin by 15%, her INR remained supratherapeutic the day after completing nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (4.0) and for several checks after. One month after completion of therapy, her INR returned to therapeutic levels. Practice Implications: While PK models and case series have hypothesized both potential increases or decreases in INR with the nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and warfarin interaction, COVID-19 infection itself can cause several pharmacodynamic changes which can increase INR, including decreased appetite and, in severe cases, organ dysfunction. This case provides real-world insight into the drug interaction between nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and the drug-disease state interaction between warfarin and COVID-19.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用尼马瑞韦/利托那韦和华法林治疗期间的超治疗INR以及COVID-19的急性病:病例报告。
背景:有几项研究使用药代动力学(PK)模型或事后 INR 值研究了服用尼马瑞韦/利托那韦后的 INR 波动,但有必要进一步研究治疗期间药物与华法林相互作用的影响。病例摘要:尼麦瑞韦/利托那韦主要在门诊环境中使用,因此有关使用华法林的住院患者 INR 趋势的数据非常有限。然而,许多在门诊接受尼尔马特韦/利托那韦治疗的患者由于感觉急病和隔离预防措施而难以到门诊接受 INR 检查。我们介绍了一位接受华法林治疗并使用家庭 INR 检测进行监测的患者的病例。在确诊为 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)后,她在检测结果呈阳性的第五天开始服用尼马瑞韦/利托那韦。开始治疗前的最新 INR 为 2.7,感染前几个月一直稳定服用相同剂量。在服用尼尔马特韦/利托那韦的第二天,她的INR在家庭护理点INR检测中升至4.0。尽管她将华法林的剂量减少了 15%,但在完成尼马瑞韦/利托那韦治疗的第二天(4.0)和之后的几次检查中,她的 INR 仍处于超治疗水平。完成治疗一个月后,她的 INR 恢复到了治疗水平。实践意义:虽然 PK 模型和系列病例都假设了尼瑞韦酯/利托那韦和华法林相互作用可能会导致 INR 升高或降低,但 COVID-19 感染本身会引起几种药效学变化,从而导致 INR 升高,包括食欲下降,严重时还会导致器官功能障碍。本病例提供了关于尼马瑞韦/利托那韦之间药物相互作用以及华法林和 COVID-19 之间药物-疾病状态相互作用的真实世界见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacy practice
Journal of pharmacy practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmacy Practice offers the practicing pharmacist topical, important, and useful information to support pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical care and expand the pharmacist"s professional horizons. The journal is presented in a single-topic, scholarly review format. Guest editors are selected for expertise in the subject area, who then recruit contributors from that practice or topic area.
期刊最新文献
Single-Dose Gentamicin vs Standard Care for Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Cystitis in Premenopausal Women: A Randomized Trial. Methemoglobinemia in the Setting of Hemolysis: A Case Report Suggesting Reflex Lab for Patients with Oxygen Saturation Gap for Early Detection and Diagnosis. Improvements in Asthma Control After Pharmacist Involvement in an Outpatient Pediatric Asthma Clinic. The Safety and Tolerability of High Dose Intravenous Push Levetiracetam. Fixed vs Weight-Based Dosing of Four-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for Factor Xa Inhibitor Reversal in Patients With a Non-Neurologic Hemorrhage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1