Effects of inter-stimulus and inter-trial intervals on somatosensory gating.

Aoi Mase, Manabu Shibasaki, Hiroki Nakata
{"title":"Effects of inter-stimulus and inter-trial intervals on somatosensory gating.","authors":"Aoi Mase, Manabu Shibasaki, Hiroki Nakata","doi":"10.1080/08990220.2024.2358516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>Sensory gating is a human higher cognitive function that serves to suppress excessive sensory information and prevent brain overactivity. To elucidate this function, a paired-pulse stimulation paradigm has been used while recording electroencephalography (EEG), and evaluated as an amplitude ratio of responses to a second stimulus (S2) over responses to the first stimulus (S1). The present study investigated the effects of the inter-stimulus interval (ISI) and inter-trial interval (ITI) on somatosensory gating using somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In Experiment 1, ISI was set at five conditions: 200, 400, 600, 800, and 1000 ms. In Experiment 2, ITI was set at four conditions: 1, 2, 4, and 8 s.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ISI affected the S2/S1 amplitude ratios of P22 and N27 at C3' and N30 at Fz, and these S2/S1 amplitude ratios decreased the most under the 200 and 400-ms conditions. ITI affected the S2/S1 amplitude ratios of P22, N27, and N60 at C3', and especially, the somatosensory gating did not work under the 1-s condition. These results suggest that not all SEP components are modulated in the same manner with changing ISI and ITI. The effects of ISI and ITI independently affected the somatosensory gating.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on our findings, preferable parameters are 200-400 ms for ISI and 4 s or longer for ITI to evaluate the functional mechanisms on somatosensory gating in SEPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94211,"journal":{"name":"Somatosensory & motor research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Somatosensory & motor research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08990220.2024.2358516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim of the study: Sensory gating is a human higher cognitive function that serves to suppress excessive sensory information and prevent brain overactivity. To elucidate this function, a paired-pulse stimulation paradigm has been used while recording electroencephalography (EEG), and evaluated as an amplitude ratio of responses to a second stimulus (S2) over responses to the first stimulus (S1). The present study investigated the effects of the inter-stimulus interval (ISI) and inter-trial interval (ITI) on somatosensory gating using somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs).

Methods: In Experiment 1, ISI was set at five conditions: 200, 400, 600, 800, and 1000 ms. In Experiment 2, ITI was set at four conditions: 1, 2, 4, and 8 s.

Results: ISI affected the S2/S1 amplitude ratios of P22 and N27 at C3' and N30 at Fz, and these S2/S1 amplitude ratios decreased the most under the 200 and 400-ms conditions. ITI affected the S2/S1 amplitude ratios of P22, N27, and N60 at C3', and especially, the somatosensory gating did not work under the 1-s condition. These results suggest that not all SEP components are modulated in the same manner with changing ISI and ITI. The effects of ISI and ITI independently affected the somatosensory gating.

Conclusions: Based on our findings, preferable parameters are 200-400 ms for ISI and 4 s or longer for ITI to evaluate the functional mechanisms on somatosensory gating in SEPs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
刺激间期和试验间期对体感门控的影响
研究目的感觉门控是人类的一种高级认知功能,其作用是抑制过多的感觉信息,防止大脑过度活跃。为了阐明这一功能,研究人员在记录脑电图(EEG)时使用了成对脉冲刺激范式,并以对第二个刺激(S2)的反应与对第一个刺激(S1)的反应的振幅比来进行评估。本研究利用体感诱发电位(SEPs)研究了刺激间歇(ISI)和试验间歇(ITI)对体感门控的影响:在实验 1 中,ISI 设置为五种条件:方法:在实验 1 中,ISI 设置为五种条件:200、400、600、800 和 1000 毫秒。实验 2 中,ITI 设置为四种情况:结果:ISI影响了S2/S1:ISI影响了C3'处P22和N27以及Fz处N30的S2/S1振幅比,这些S2/S1振幅比在200和400毫秒条件下下降最大。ITI 影响了 C3'处 P22、N27 和 N60 的 S2/S1 振幅比,尤其是在 1 秒条件下,体感门控不起作用。这些结果表明,随着 ISI 和 ITI 的变化,并非所有 SEP 成分都以相同的方式受到调节。ISI和ITI对体感门控的影响是独立的:根据我们的研究结果,在评估 SEP 中躯体感觉门控的功能机制时,ISI 的参数最好为 200-400 毫秒,ITI 的参数最好为 4 秒或更长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is predictability of the conditioning stimulus (CS) a critical factor in conditioned pain modulation (CPM)? Comparison of the acute effects of different techniques on the ankle joint range of motion in healthy older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Predicting lever press in a vibrotactile yes/no detection task from S1 cortex of freely behaving rats by µECoG arrays. Effects of inter-stimulus and inter-trial intervals on somatosensory gating. Descending motor command to prime mover of dependent finger induces tactile gating in target and distant non-target finger.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1