Task-based EEG and fMRI paradigms in a multimodal clinical diagnostic framework for disorders of consciousness.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Reviews in the Neurosciences Pub Date : 2024-05-29 Print Date: 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1515/revneuro-2023-0159
Chris Chun Hei Lo, Peter Yat Ming Woo, Vincent C K Cheung
{"title":"Task-based EEG and fMRI paradigms in a multimodal clinical diagnostic framework for disorders of consciousness.","authors":"Chris Chun Hei Lo, Peter Yat Ming Woo, Vincent C K Cheung","doi":"10.1515/revneuro-2023-0159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disorders of consciousness (DoC) are generally diagnosed by clinical assessment, which is a predominantly motor-driven process and accounts for up to 40 % of non-communication being misdiagnosed as unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) (previously known as prolonged/persistent vegetative state). Given the consequences of misdiagnosis, a more reliable and objective multimodal protocol to diagnosing DoC is needed, but has not been produced due to concerns regarding their interpretation and reliability. Of the techniques commonly used to detect consciousness in DoC, task-based paradigms (active paradigms) produce the most unequivocal result when findings are positive. It is well-established that command following (CF) reliably reflects preserved consciousness. Task-based electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can detect motor-independent CF and reveal preserved covert consciousness in up to 14 % of UWS patients. Accordingly, to improve the diagnostic accuracy of DoC, we propose a practical multimodal clinical decision framework centered on task-based EEG and fMRI, and complemented by measures like transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS-EEG).</p>","PeriodicalId":49623,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in the Neurosciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in the Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/revneuro-2023-0159","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disorders of consciousness (DoC) are generally diagnosed by clinical assessment, which is a predominantly motor-driven process and accounts for up to 40 % of non-communication being misdiagnosed as unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) (previously known as prolonged/persistent vegetative state). Given the consequences of misdiagnosis, a more reliable and objective multimodal protocol to diagnosing DoC is needed, but has not been produced due to concerns regarding their interpretation and reliability. Of the techniques commonly used to detect consciousness in DoC, task-based paradigms (active paradigms) produce the most unequivocal result when findings are positive. It is well-established that command following (CF) reliably reflects preserved consciousness. Task-based electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can detect motor-independent CF and reveal preserved covert consciousness in up to 14 % of UWS patients. Accordingly, to improve the diagnostic accuracy of DoC, we propose a practical multimodal clinical decision framework centered on task-based EEG and fMRI, and complemented by measures like transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS-EEG).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意识障碍多模态临床诊断框架中基于任务的脑电图和 fMRI 范例。
意识障碍(DoC)一般通过临床评估来诊断,而临床评估主要是一个运动驱动的过程,因此高达 40% 的无交流患者被误诊为无反应清醒综合征(UWS)(以前称为长期/持续植物状态)。考虑到误诊的后果,我们需要一种更可靠、更客观的多模态方案来诊断 DoC,但由于对其解释和可靠性的担忧,这种方案尚未问世。在常用于检测 DoC 意识的技术中,基于任务的范式(主动范式)在检测结果呈阳性时能产生最明确的结果。命令追踪(CF)能可靠地反映意识的保留,这一点已得到公认。基于任务的脑电图(EEG)和功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)可检测出运动依赖性 CF,并显示多达 14% 的 UWS 患者的隐蔽意识得到了保留。因此,为了提高 DoC 诊断的准确性,我们提出了一个实用的多模态临床决策框架,该框架以基于任务的脑电图和功能磁共振成像(fMRI)为中心,并辅以经颅磁刺激(TMS-EEG)等措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in the Neurosciences
Reviews in the Neurosciences 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
54
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reviews in the Neurosciences provides a forum for reviews, critical evaluations and theoretical treatment of selective topics in the neurosciences. The journal is meant to provide an authoritative reference work for those interested in the structure and functions of the nervous system at all levels of analysis, including the genetic, molecular, cellular, behavioral, cognitive and clinical neurosciences. Contributions should contain a critical appraisal of specific areas and not simply a compilation of published articles.
期刊最新文献
Human foot cutaneous receptors function: clinical findings and prospects of using medical devices to stimulate mechanoreceptors in neurorehabilitation. Transformer-based approaches for neuroimaging: an in-depth review of their role in classification and regression tasks. Involvement of kinases in memory consolidation of inhibitory avoidance training. Neurobiological mechanisms in the kynurenine pathway and major depressive disorder. Dissecting the immune response of CD4+ T cells in Alzheimer's disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1