Vancomycin: An analysis and evaluation of eight population pharmacokinetic models for clinical application in general adult population.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacotherapy Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1002/phar.2941
Alexandre Duong, Ahmed El Gamal, Véronique Bilodeau, Justine Huot, Carole Delorme, Johanne Poudrette, Benoît Crevier, Amélie Marsot
{"title":"Vancomycin: An analysis and evaluation of eight population pharmacokinetic models for clinical application in general adult population.","authors":"Alexandre Duong, Ahmed El Gamal, Véronique Bilodeau, Justine Huot, Carole Delorme, Johanne Poudrette, Benoît Crevier, Amélie Marsot","doi":"10.1002/phar.2941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Based on the recent guidelines for vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), the area under the curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio was to be employed combined with the usage of population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model for dosing adaptation. Yet, deploying these models in a clinical setting requires an external evaluation of their performance.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate existing vancomycin popPK models from the literature for the use in TDM within the general patient population in a clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The models under external evaluation were chosen based on a review of literature covering vancomycin popPK models developed in general adult populations. Patients' data were collected from Charles-Le Moyne Hospital (CLMH). The external evaluation was performed with NONMEM® (v7.5). Additional analyses such as evaluating the impact of number of samples on external evaluation, Bayesian forecasting, and a priori dosing regimen simulations were performed on the best performing model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight popPK models were evaluated with an independent dataset that included 40 patients and 252 samples. The model developed by Goti and colleagues demonstrated superior performance in diagnostic plots and population predictive performance, with bias and inaccuracy values of 0.251% and 22.7%, respectively, and for individual predictive performance, bias and inaccuracy were -4.90% and 12.1%, respectively. When limiting the independent dataset to one or two samples per patient, the Goti model exhibited inadequate predictive performance for inaccuracy, with values exceeding 30%. Moreover, the Goti model is suitable for Bayesian forecasting with at least two samples as prior for the prediction of the next trough concentration. Furthermore, the vancomycin dosing regimen that would maximize therapeutic targets of area under the curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio (AUC<sub>24</sub>/MIC) and trough concentrations (C<sub>trough</sub>) for the Goti model was 20 mg/kg/dose twice daily.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Considering the superior predictive performance and potential for Bayesian forecasting in the Goti model, future research aims to test its applicability in clinical settings at CLMH, both in a priori and a posteriori scenario.</p>","PeriodicalId":20013,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.2941","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Based on the recent guidelines for vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), the area under the curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio was to be employed combined with the usage of population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model for dosing adaptation. Yet, deploying these models in a clinical setting requires an external evaluation of their performance.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate existing vancomycin popPK models from the literature for the use in TDM within the general patient population in a clinical setting.

Methods: The models under external evaluation were chosen based on a review of literature covering vancomycin popPK models developed in general adult populations. Patients' data were collected from Charles-Le Moyne Hospital (CLMH). The external evaluation was performed with NONMEM® (v7.5). Additional analyses such as evaluating the impact of number of samples on external evaluation, Bayesian forecasting, and a priori dosing regimen simulations were performed on the best performing model.

Results: Eight popPK models were evaluated with an independent dataset that included 40 patients and 252 samples. The model developed by Goti and colleagues demonstrated superior performance in diagnostic plots and population predictive performance, with bias and inaccuracy values of 0.251% and 22.7%, respectively, and for individual predictive performance, bias and inaccuracy were -4.90% and 12.1%, respectively. When limiting the independent dataset to one or two samples per patient, the Goti model exhibited inadequate predictive performance for inaccuracy, with values exceeding 30%. Moreover, the Goti model is suitable for Bayesian forecasting with at least two samples as prior for the prediction of the next trough concentration. Furthermore, the vancomycin dosing regimen that would maximize therapeutic targets of area under the curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio (AUC24/MIC) and trough concentrations (Ctrough) for the Goti model was 20 mg/kg/dose twice daily.

Conclusion: Considering the superior predictive performance and potential for Bayesian forecasting in the Goti model, future research aims to test its applicability in clinical settings at CLMH, both in a priori and a posteriori scenario.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
万古霉素:分析和评估八种人群药代动力学模型在普通成年人群中的临床应用。
前言根据最新的万古霉素治疗药物监测(TDM)指南,曲线下面积与最低抑制浓度比值应与群体药代动力学(popPK)模型相结合用于剂量调整。然而,在临床环境中使用这些模型需要对其性能进行外部评估:本研究旨在评估文献中现有的万古霉素 popPK 模型在临床环境中用于普通患者人群 TDM 的情况:方法:根据对在普通成年人群中开发的万古霉素 popPK 模型的文献综述,选择了接受外部评估的模型。患者数据来自查尔斯-勒莫恩医院(CLMH)。外部评估使用 NONMEM® (v7.5) 进行。对表现最好的模型进行了其他分析,如评估样本数量对外部评估的影响、贝叶斯预测和先验给药方案模拟:利用一个独立数据集对八个 popPK 模型进行了评估,该数据集包括 40 名患者和 252 个样本。Goti及其同事开发的模型在诊断图谱和群体预测性能方面表现出色,偏差和误差值分别为0.251%和22.7%;在个体预测性能方面,偏差和误差值分别为-4.90%和12.1%。当将独立数据集限制为每个患者一个或两个样本时,Goti 模型在不准确性方面的预测性能不足,数值超过 30%。此外,Goti 模型适用于贝叶斯预测,至少有两个样本作为预测下一个谷浓度的先验。此外,对于 Goti 模型来说,能最大限度地实现曲线下面积与最小抑制浓度比值(AUC24/MIC)和谷浓度(Ctrough)治疗目标的万古霉素给药方案是 20 毫克/千克/剂量,每天两次:考虑到 Goti 模型卓越的预测性能和贝叶斯预测的潜力,未来的研究旨在测试其在 CLMH 临床环境中的先验和后验应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacotherapy
Pharmacotherapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
93
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmacotherapy is devoted to publication of original research articles on all aspects of human pharmacology and review articles on drugs and drug therapy. The Editors and Editorial Board invite original research reports on pharmacokinetic, bioavailability, and drug interaction studies, clinical trials, investigations of specific pharmacological properties of drugs, and related topics.
期刊最新文献
Cannabinoids for obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review. ECLIPSES: Early initiation of sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors for cardiovascular protection in patients with type 2 diabetes following acute coronary syndrome and subsequent coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Sex differences in LDL-C reduction response to evolocumab: A propensity score matching analysis. Association between gastroprotective agents and acute kidney injury in patients receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: Analysis of a Japanese hospital-based database. Albuminuria-based stratification of end-stage kidney disease progression and mortality with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i): A retrospective cohort study in type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1