Using language to identify a bladder pain component in women with Dysmenorrhoea-Related Pelvic Pain: A cross-sectional study.

Abstract

Background: Dysmenorrhoea-Related Pelvic Pain (DRPP) is a common condition, which may or may not include bladder-related symptoms. Primary health care practitioners (PHCP) rely heavily on language for diagnosis of DRPP-related conditions. However, there are no established pain descriptors to assist PHCP to determine whether an individual's DRPP may include a bladder component.

Aims: To identify differences in the use of pain descriptors in women with DRPP with and without a co-existing bladder pain component, through an exploratory study of the language of pelvic pain in women.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional online survey of Australian and New Zealand women (n = 750, ages 18-49) who have self-identified pelvic pain. Free text and predetermined pain descriptors used by women with a self-perceived bladder pain component (DRPPB+, n = 468) were compared to those without bladder pain (DRPPB-, n = 282). Statistical analysis included Pearson χ², logistic regression and analysis of variance tests using StataCorp Stata Statistical Software combined with qualitative data from AntConc concordance software.

Results: Within free-form text, bloating (P = 0.014) and pressure (P = 0.031) were used more commonly to describe dysmenorrhoea in women with DRPPB+, while the word excruciating (P < 0.001) was more commonly used by women with DRPPB-. From a pre-determined list of descriptors, pounding (P < 0.001), tingling (P < 0.001), stabbing (P = 0.010), burning (P = 0.002) and cramping (P = 0.021) were more commonly used by women with DRPPB+, than women with DRPPB-.

Conclusions: Systematic patterns of word use should encourage practitioners to further enquire about bladder symptoms that may co-exist with dysmenorrhoea. Knowledge of these words may be useful in targeting diagnostic and therapeutic interventions.