Does ownership structure drive the effect of CEO overconfidence on earnings quality?

IF 3.9 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Applied Accounting Research Pub Date : 2024-05-30 DOI:10.1108/jaar-10-2022-0265
Bilel Bzeouich, Florence Depoers, Faten Lakhal
{"title":"Does ownership structure drive the effect of CEO overconfidence on earnings quality?","authors":"Bilel Bzeouich, Florence Depoers, Faten Lakhal","doi":"10.1108/jaar-10-2022-0265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of chief executive officer (CEO) overconfidence on earnings quality and the moderating role of ownership structure as a crucial corporate governance device.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The paper uses the generalized method of moments (GMM) estimation method to test our models on a sample of 335 French companies between 2009 and 2020, i.e. 4,020 observations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results show that CEO overconfidence negatively affects earnings quality. This result supports the predictions of behavioral finance theory and suggests that CEO overconfidence is a behavioral bias that affects the quality of earnings. The authors also examined the effect of different types of ownership structures on this relationship. The results show the significant role of controlling shareholders, owner-managers, families and institutional investors in mitigating the negative effect of CEO overconfidence on earnings quality.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>This paper has some limitations. First, other types of ownership structures could have been analyzed such as state ownership. Second, we ignored the role of the board of directors as an important governance mechanism in controlling overconfident CEOs’ actions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>Companies should be aware of the potential risks associated with CEO overconfidence, which can compromise the faithful representation of earnings. This highlights the importance of effective monitoring and internal controls to detect and prevent such practices, which involve the role of ownership structure.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This paper addresses the effect of CEO overconfidence on earnings quality and provides new evidence on the role of different ownership structure types in shaping this relationship. Additionally, this paper sheds new light on how overconfident CEOs may behave in challenging times.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":46321,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Accounting Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jaar-10-2022-0265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of chief executive officer (CEO) overconfidence on earnings quality and the moderating role of ownership structure as a crucial corporate governance device.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper uses the generalized method of moments (GMM) estimation method to test our models on a sample of 335 French companies between 2009 and 2020, i.e. 4,020 observations.

Findings

The results show that CEO overconfidence negatively affects earnings quality. This result supports the predictions of behavioral finance theory and suggests that CEO overconfidence is a behavioral bias that affects the quality of earnings. The authors also examined the effect of different types of ownership structures on this relationship. The results show the significant role of controlling shareholders, owner-managers, families and institutional investors in mitigating the negative effect of CEO overconfidence on earnings quality.

Research limitations/implications

This paper has some limitations. First, other types of ownership structures could have been analyzed such as state ownership. Second, we ignored the role of the board of directors as an important governance mechanism in controlling overconfident CEOs’ actions.

Practical implications

Companies should be aware of the potential risks associated with CEO overconfidence, which can compromise the faithful representation of earnings. This highlights the importance of effective monitoring and internal controls to detect and prevent such practices, which involve the role of ownership structure.

Originality/value

This paper addresses the effect of CEO overconfidence on earnings quality and provides new evidence on the role of different ownership structure types in shaping this relationship. Additionally, this paper sheds new light on how overconfident CEOs may behave in challenging times.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
所有权结构是否驱动首席执行官过度自信对收益质量的影响?
本文旨在研究首席执行官(CEO)过度自信对收益质量的影响,以及所有权结构作为重要公司治理工具的调节作用。本文采用广义矩量法(GMM)估计方法,对 2009 年至 2020 年间 335 家法国公司的样本(即 4020 个观测值)进行模型检验。这一结果支持行为金融理论的预测,表明首席执行官过度自信是一种影响收益质量的行为偏差。作者还研究了不同类型的所有权结构对这种关系的影响。结果表明,控股股东、所有者-经理人、家族和机构投资者在减轻首席执行官过度自信对收益质量的负面影响方面发挥了重要作用。首先,我们本可以分析其他类型的所有权结构,如国有所有权。其次,我们忽略了董事会作为控制首席执行官过度自信行为的重要治理机制的作用。实际意义公司应意识到与首席执行官过度自信相关的潜在风险,这可能会影响收益的忠实反映。这凸显了有效监督和内部控制对发现和预防此类行为的重要性,其中涉及所有权结构的作用。此外,本文还揭示了过度自信的首席执行官在充满挑战的时期可能采取的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Accounting Research provides a forum for the publication of high quality manuscripts concerning issues relevant to the practice of accounting in a wide variety of contexts. The journal seeks to promote a research agenda that allows academics and practitioners to work together to provide sustainable outcomes in a practice setting. The journal is keen to encourage academic research articles which develop a forum for the discussion of real, practical problems and provide the expertise to allow solutions to these problems to be formed, while also contributing to our theoretical understanding of such issues.
期刊最新文献
Greenhouse gas assurance and carbon emission performance in light of the auditor’s reputation and the country’s development level A mixed methods study of influences on perceived budgeting accuracy in UK universities Corporate culture's influence on the transparency of financial reporting in Iran: an in-depth analysis of readability and tone Earnings quality among private firms: evidence from the ELITE context The impact of board gender diversity on firm performance: does critical mass matter?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1