Banking competition in Indonesia: does Fintech lending matters?

IF 1.3 Q3 ECONOMICS Journal of Financial Economic Policy Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1108/jfep-12-2023-0365
Salsa Dilla, Aidil Rizal Shahrin, Fauzi Zainir
{"title":"Banking competition in Indonesia: does Fintech lending matters?","authors":"Salsa Dilla, Aidil Rizal Shahrin, Fauzi Zainir","doi":"10.1108/jfep-12-2023-0365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims to examine how the rise of financial technology (Fintech) lending affects bank competition. Moreover, this study also identifies the structure of Indonesian commercial banking sector and the different behaviour of competition among bank groups (based on their size, type and ownership) and the joint impact of COVID-19 due to the rise of Fintech lending.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Using an unbalanced panel data set of 118 commercial banks in Indonesia over the period 2018–2022, both static panel and 2SLS/IV data analysis were used and found that random effect model is the best model.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results show that the Indonesian commercial banking sector can be considered as monopolistic competition. Moreover, using the Lerner index reveals that the entry of the Fintech lenders increases bank competition. Furthermore, there were different responses to the impact of Fintech lending on bank competition among state-owned banks, private banks, regional development banks and foreign banks. Greater efficiency and stability lead to greater market power. In the meantime, higher level of asset growth, capitalisation and cost-to-income ratio increase the competition. Lastly, higher bank credit growth and lower inflation boost overall bank competitiveness.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>This study highlights some policy recommendations for commercial banks to be aware of the coming of Fintech lenders because they have started to increase the market competition. The government should create a more collaborative ecosystem between banks and Fintech lending to anticipate unhealthy competition.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study will contribute to the literature by expanding the determinants of bank competition by considering the rise of Fintech lending in the market.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":45556,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Economic Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Economic Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfep-12-2023-0365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to examine how the rise of financial technology (Fintech) lending affects bank competition. Moreover, this study also identifies the structure of Indonesian commercial banking sector and the different behaviour of competition among bank groups (based on their size, type and ownership) and the joint impact of COVID-19 due to the rise of Fintech lending.

Design/methodology/approach

Using an unbalanced panel data set of 118 commercial banks in Indonesia over the period 2018–2022, both static panel and 2SLS/IV data analysis were used and found that random effect model is the best model.

Findings

The results show that the Indonesian commercial banking sector can be considered as monopolistic competition. Moreover, using the Lerner index reveals that the entry of the Fintech lenders increases bank competition. Furthermore, there were different responses to the impact of Fintech lending on bank competition among state-owned banks, private banks, regional development banks and foreign banks. Greater efficiency and stability lead to greater market power. In the meantime, higher level of asset growth, capitalisation and cost-to-income ratio increase the competition. Lastly, higher bank credit growth and lower inflation boost overall bank competitiveness.

Practical implications

This study highlights some policy recommendations for commercial banks to be aware of the coming of Fintech lenders because they have started to increase the market competition. The government should create a more collaborative ecosystem between banks and Fintech lending to anticipate unhealthy competition.

Originality/value

This study will contribute to the literature by expanding the determinants of bank competition by considering the rise of Fintech lending in the market.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度尼西亚的银行业竞争:金融科技贷款是否重要?
本文旨在研究金融科技(Fintech)贷款的兴起如何影响银行竞争。此外,本研究还确定了印尼商业银行部门的结构和银行集团之间不同的竞争行为(基于其规模、类型和所有权),以及 COVID-19 因金融科技贷款的兴起而产生的共同影响。设计/方法/方法使用 2018-2022 年期间印尼 118 家商业银行的非平衡面板数据集,采用静态面板和 2SLS/IV 数据分析,发现随机效应模型是最佳模型。研究结果结果表明,印尼商业银行部门可视为垄断竞争。此外,利用勒纳指数可以看出,金融科技贷款机构的进入增加了银行竞争。此外,国有银行、私营银行、地区发展银行和外资银行对金融科技贷款对银行竞争的影响反应不同。更高的效率和稳定性会带来更大的市场力量。同时,资产增长、资本化和成本收入比水平的提高也会加剧竞争。最后,较高的银行信贷增长和较低的通货膨胀率提升了银行的整体竞争力。 本研究强调了一些政策建议,商业银行应警惕金融科技贷款机构的到来,因为它们已开始加剧市场竞争。政府应在银行和金融科技贷款机构之间建立一个更具协作性的生态系统,以避免恶性竞争。原创性/价值本研究通过考虑金融科技贷款机构在市场中的崛起,拓展了银行竞争的决定因素,从而为相关文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The Journal of Financial Economic Policy publishes high quality peer reviewed research on financial economic policy issues. The journal is devoted to the advancement of the understanding of the entire spectrum of financial policy and control issues and their interactions to economic phenomena. Economic and financial phenomena involve complex trade-offs and linkages between various types of risk factors and variables of interest to policy makers and market participants alike. Market participants such as economic policy makers, regulators, banking and competition supervisors, corporations and financial institutions, require timely and robust answers to the contemporary and emerging policy questions. In turn, such answers require thorough input by the academics, policy makers and practitioners alike. The Journal of Financial Economic Policy provides the forum to satisfy this need. The journal publishes and invites concise papers to enable a prompt response to current and emerging policy affairs.
期刊最新文献
The impact of formal and informal credit institutions on entrepreneurship Financial inclusion and household consumption behaviour in Ghana The absorptive capacity of the institution in the link between remittances and financial development in Africa: an advance panel regression Why do Indian exporting firms borrow in foreign currency? Volatility dynamics in energy and agriculture markets: An analysis of domestic and global uncertainty factors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1