Aziz Sheikhigarjan, Mahmoud Safari, Mostafa Mansour Ghazi, Ali Zarnegar, Shahram Shahrokhi, Nikrooz Bagheri, Saeed Moein, Peyman Seyedin
{"title":"Chemical control of wheat sunn pest, Eurygaster integriceps, by UAV sprayer and very low volume knapsack sprayer","authors":"Aziz Sheikhigarjan, Mahmoud Safari, Mostafa Mansour Ghazi, Ali Zarnegar, Shahram Shahrokhi, Nikrooz Bagheri, Saeed Moein, Peyman Seyedin","doi":"10.1007/s12600-024-01166-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Sunn pest, Eurygaster integriceps Puton (Heteroptera: Scutelleridae), is one of the most important pests of wheat crops in Iran and the Middle East. Chemical control by high-volume spraying is the most common method of controlling this pest. The current ground sprayers lack advanced spraying technologies, which results in low efficiency. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) sprayer for the chemical control of wheat Sunn pest. The effectiveness, field capacity, and costs of chemical insecticide application were compared between the UAV sprayer and the Very Low Volume (VLV) Knapsack Sprayer (KS). We found that the chemical control effectiveness of the two spraying methods was not significantly different. The UAV sprayer and the VLV knapsack sprayer had an effectiveness percentage of more than 95%. The UAV sprayer was better than the other in terms of field capacity, insecticide dosage ml ha-1, spray volume L ha-1, reduced drift, and the probability of the operator exposure. The field capacities of the UAV sprayer and the VLV knapsack sprayer were 3.75 and 0.5 hectares per hour, respectively, and the spray volumes were 14.6 and 30.0 L ha-1, respectively.5.5 and 0.8 hectares per hour, respectively, and the spray volume was 14.6 and 30.0 L ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":20220,"journal":{"name":"Phytoparasitica","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phytoparasitica","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-024-01166-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Sunn pest, Eurygaster integriceps Puton (Heteroptera: Scutelleridae), is one of the most important pests of wheat crops in Iran and the Middle East. Chemical control by high-volume spraying is the most common method of controlling this pest. The current ground sprayers lack advanced spraying technologies, which results in low efficiency. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) sprayer for the chemical control of wheat Sunn pest. The effectiveness, field capacity, and costs of chemical insecticide application were compared between the UAV sprayer and the Very Low Volume (VLV) Knapsack Sprayer (KS). We found that the chemical control effectiveness of the two spraying methods was not significantly different. The UAV sprayer and the VLV knapsack sprayer had an effectiveness percentage of more than 95%. The UAV sprayer was better than the other in terms of field capacity, insecticide dosage ml ha-1, spray volume L ha-1, reduced drift, and the probability of the operator exposure. The field capacities of the UAV sprayer and the VLV knapsack sprayer were 3.75 and 0.5 hectares per hour, respectively, and the spray volumes were 14.6 and 30.0 L ha-1, respectively.5.5 and 0.8 hectares per hour, respectively, and the spray volume was 14.6 and 30.0 L ha−1, respectively.
期刊介绍:
Phytoparasitica is an international journal on Plant Protection, that publishes original research contributions on the biological, chemical and molecular aspects of Entomology, Plant Pathology, Virology, Nematology, and Weed Sciences, which strives to improve scientific knowledge and technology for IPM, in forest and agroecosystems. Phytoparasitica emphasizes new insights into plant disease and pest etiology, epidemiology, host-parasite/pest biochemistry and cell biology, ecology and population biology, host genetics and resistance, disease vector biology, plant stress and biotic disorders, postharvest pathology and mycotoxins. Research can cover aspects related to the nature of plant diseases, pests and weeds, the causal agents, their spread, the losses they cause, crop loss assessment, and novel tactics and approaches for their management.