Soil nitrogen dynamics affected by coffee (coffea arabica) canopy and fertilizer management in coffee-based agroforestry

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Agroforestry Systems Pub Date : 2024-05-27 DOI:10.1007/s10457-024-01004-8
Syahrul Kurniawan, R Muhammad Yusuf Adi Pujo Nugroho, Reni Ustiatik, Istika Nita, Gabryna Auliya Nugroho, Cahyo Prayogo, Christopher W. N. Anderson
{"title":"Soil nitrogen dynamics affected by coffee (coffea arabica) canopy and fertilizer management in coffee-based agroforestry","authors":"Syahrul Kurniawan, R Muhammad Yusuf Adi Pujo Nugroho, Reni Ustiatik, Istika Nita, Gabryna Auliya Nugroho, Cahyo Prayogo, Christopher W. N. Anderson","doi":"10.1007/s10457-024-01004-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nutrient management in coffee-based agroforestry systems plays a critical role in soil nitrogen (N) cycling, but has not been well documented. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of coffee canopy management and fertilization on soil N dynamics. This study used a randomized complete block design (2 × 3 × 2) with four replications. There were three factors: 1) coffee canopy management (T1: Pruned, T2: Unpruned), 2) fertilizer type (O: Organic, I: Inorganic; M: 50% Organic + 50% Inorganic), and 3) fertilizer dose (D1: low, D2: medium, D3: high). Soil N dynamic indicators (i.e., total N, ammonium (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>), nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>), net N-NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, net N-NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>, soil microbial biomass N) were measured at two soil sampling depths (0–20 cm and 20–40 cm). Results showed that pruning increased soil total N and microbial biomass N (MBN) by 10–56% relative to unpruned coffee trees. In contrast, the unpruned coffee canopy had 15–345% higher NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>, net N-NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, net N-NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>, and microbial biomass N concentration than pruned coffee. Mixed fertilizer application increased NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> and net N-NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> accumulation by 5–15% relative to inorganic and organic fertilizers. In addition, medium to high dose fertilization led to a 19–86% higher net N-NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> concentration and microbial biomass N as compared to low dose fertilization. The treatment of no pruning and mixed fertilizer at low to medium doses was the optimal management strategy to maintain soil available N, while pruning combined with organic fertilizer has the potential to improve soil total N and MBN.</p>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-024-01004-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nutrient management in coffee-based agroforestry systems plays a critical role in soil nitrogen (N) cycling, but has not been well documented. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of coffee canopy management and fertilization on soil N dynamics. This study used a randomized complete block design (2 × 3 × 2) with four replications. There were three factors: 1) coffee canopy management (T1: Pruned, T2: Unpruned), 2) fertilizer type (O: Organic, I: Inorganic; M: 50% Organic + 50% Inorganic), and 3) fertilizer dose (D1: low, D2: medium, D3: high). Soil N dynamic indicators (i.e., total N, ammonium (NH4+), nitrate (NO3), net N-NH4+, net N-NO3, soil microbial biomass N) were measured at two soil sampling depths (0–20 cm and 20–40 cm). Results showed that pruning increased soil total N and microbial biomass N (MBN) by 10–56% relative to unpruned coffee trees. In contrast, the unpruned coffee canopy had 15–345% higher NH4+, NO3, net N-NH4+, net N-NO3, and microbial biomass N concentration than pruned coffee. Mixed fertilizer application increased NO3 and net N-NH4+ accumulation by 5–15% relative to inorganic and organic fertilizers. In addition, medium to high dose fertilization led to a 19–86% higher net N-NO3 concentration and microbial biomass N as compared to low dose fertilization. The treatment of no pruning and mixed fertilizer at low to medium doses was the optimal management strategy to maintain soil available N, while pruning combined with organic fertilizer has the potential to improve soil total N and MBN.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以咖啡为基础的农林业中受咖啡(阿拉伯咖啡)冠层和肥料管理影响的土壤氮动态
以咖啡为基础的农林系统中的养分管理在土壤氮(N)循环中起着至关重要的作用,但却没有很好的记录。本研究旨在评估咖啡冠层管理和施肥对土壤氮动态的影响。本研究采用随机完全区组设计(2 × 3 × 2),四次重复。共有三个因子:1)咖啡树冠管理(T1:修剪,T2:未修剪);2)肥料类型(O:有机肥,I:无机肥;M:50% 有机肥 + 50% 无机肥);3)肥料剂量(D1:低,D2:中,D3:高)。在两个土壤取样深度(0-20 厘米和 20-40 厘米)测量了土壤氮动态指标(即全氮、铵(NH4+)、硝酸盐(NO3-)、净 N-NH4+、净 N-NO3-、土壤微生物生物量氮)。结果表明,与未修剪的咖啡树相比,修剪后土壤总氮和微生物生物量氮(MBN)增加了 10-56%。相比之下,未修剪咖啡树冠的 NH4+、NO3-、净 N-NH4+、净 N-NO3- 和微生物生物量 N 浓度比修剪过的咖啡树高 15-345%。与无机肥和有机肥相比,混合施肥可使 NO3- 和净 N-NH4+ 积累增加 5-15%。此外,与低剂量施肥相比,中高浓度施肥使净 N-NO3- 浓度和微生物生物量 N 高出 19-86%。不修剪和中低剂量混合施肥是保持土壤可用氮的最佳管理策略,而修剪结合有机肥则有可能改善土壤总氮和甲基溴氮。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry Systems 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base
期刊最新文献
Trees and grass buffers impact on soil carbon in an agroforestry alleycropping watershed Vegetation structure and bird diversity in silvopastoral systems of the Amazonian piedmont of Colombia Basal area as a strategic indicator for forest component management in silvopastoral systems: insights from long-term experiments Direct and indirect estimations of aerial forage net primary productivity in Nothofagus antarctica forests under silvopastoral systems in Northwest of Chubut, Argentina Botanical composition gradients in silvopastoral systems on temperate native grasslands of Uruguay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1