Exploring the impact of ball possession directionality on youth footballers’ positioning, technical skills and physical abilities in small-sided games

IF 1.5 4区 教育学 Q3 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching Pub Date : 2024-05-27 DOI:10.1177/17479541241257016
Diogo Coutinho, Bruno Gonçalves, Adam Leigh Kelly, Sara Santos, Pedro Figueiredo, Carlos Soares, Bruno Travassos
{"title":"Exploring the impact of ball possession directionality on youth footballers’ positioning, technical skills and physical abilities in small-sided games","authors":"Diogo Coutinho, Bruno Gonçalves, Adam Leigh Kelly, Sara Santos, Pedro Figueiredo, Carlos Soares, Bruno Travassos","doi":"10.1177/17479541241257016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to investigate the effects of manipulating ball possession directionality (i.e., NO direction, MULTI direction or ONE direction) on the physical, tactical and technical performance of youth football players during small-sided games (SSGs). A total of 18 male youth football players (age: 13.6 ± 0.4 years) participated in four testing days, where they completed three random order experimental tasks based on a 4vs4 SSG: (i) NO direction, where players performed a ball possession task without a specific direction to progress; (ii) MULTI direction, where two neutral players were added to the top of each pitch and players could use them to maintain possession; and (iii) ONE direction, where each team defended and scored in two small goals placed at opposite ends of the pitch. In the positioning perspective, the NO condition showed a higher spatial exploration index than the other two conditions ( p = .001), while higher distance to the nearest teammate was identified in the MULTI ( p = .007) and to the nearest opponent in the ONE ( p < .001). In the physical variables, higher game pace ( p = .002), total distance covered ( p < .001) and jogging distance ( p < .001) were identified in the MULTI than the other conditions. Lastly, from the technical perspective, players revealed better passing decision-making ( p = .004) in the ONE than NO or MULTI conditions. Based on these results, coaches may use NO condition to emphasize space exploration, MULTI to increase external load and game pace, while ONE to emphasize technical actions related to ball control and pass.","PeriodicalId":47767,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541241257016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effects of manipulating ball possession directionality (i.e., NO direction, MULTI direction or ONE direction) on the physical, tactical and technical performance of youth football players during small-sided games (SSGs). A total of 18 male youth football players (age: 13.6 ± 0.4 years) participated in four testing days, where they completed three random order experimental tasks based on a 4vs4 SSG: (i) NO direction, where players performed a ball possession task without a specific direction to progress; (ii) MULTI direction, where two neutral players were added to the top of each pitch and players could use them to maintain possession; and (iii) ONE direction, where each team defended and scored in two small goals placed at opposite ends of the pitch. In the positioning perspective, the NO condition showed a higher spatial exploration index than the other two conditions ( p = .001), while higher distance to the nearest teammate was identified in the MULTI ( p = .007) and to the nearest opponent in the ONE ( p < .001). In the physical variables, higher game pace ( p = .002), total distance covered ( p < .001) and jogging distance ( p < .001) were identified in the MULTI than the other conditions. Lastly, from the technical perspective, players revealed better passing decision-making ( p = .004) in the ONE than NO or MULTI conditions. Based on these results, coaches may use NO condition to emphasize space exploration, MULTI to increase external load and game pace, while ONE to emphasize technical actions related to ball control and pass.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索持球方向性对青少年足球运动员在小型比赛中的定位、技术技能和体能的影响
本研究旨在探讨操控持球方向性(即无方向、多方向或单一方向)对青少年足球运动员在小场比赛(SSGs)中的体能、战术和技术表现的影响。共有 18 名男性青少年足球运动员(年龄:13.6 ± 0.4 岁)参加了为期四天的测试,他们在 4vs4 SSG 的基础上完成了三项随机顺序的实验任务:(i) 无方向,即球员在没有特定前进方向的情况下完成控球任务;(ii) 多方向,即在每个球场的顶部增加两名中立球员,球员可以利用他们来保持控球;(iii) 一个方向,即每队在球场两端的两个小球中进行防守和得分。从定位角度看,"无 "条件下的空间探索指数高于其他两种条件(p = .001),而 "多 "条件下与最近队友的距离较远(p = .007),"一 "条件下与最近对手的距离较远(p <.001)。在体能变量方面,与其他条件相比,MULTI 条件下的比赛速度(p = .002)、总路程(p < .001)和慢跑距离(p < .001)更高。最后,从技术角度来看,球员在 "单一 "条件下的传球决策能力(p = .004)优于 "无 "或 "多重 "条件下的传球决策能力(p = .004)。基于这些结果,教练员可以利用 "无 "条件强调空间探索,利用 "多 "条件增加外部负荷和比赛节奏,而利用 "一 "条件强调与控球和传球有关的技术动作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
15.80%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching is a peer-reviewed, international, academic/professional journal, which aims to bridge the gap between coaching and sports science. The journal will integrate theory and practice in sports science, promote critical reflection of coaching practice, and evaluate commonly accepted beliefs about coaching effectiveness and performance enhancement. Open learning systems will be promoted in which: (a) sports science is made accessible to coaches, translating knowledge into working practice; and (b) the challenges faced by coaches are communicated to sports scientists. The vision of the journal is to support the development of a community in which: (i) sports scientists and coaches respect and learn from each other as they assist athletes to acquire skills by training safely and effectively, thereby enhancing their performance, maximizing their enjoyment of the sporting experience and facilitating character development; and (ii) scientific research is embraced in the quest to uncover, understand and develop the processes involved in sports coaching and elite performance.
期刊最新文献
Impact of coach education on coaching effectiveness in youth sport: A systematic review and meta-analysis Insights into coaching effectiveness: Perspectives from coaches and players in South African Women's Rugby A principled approach to skill acquisition in competitive surfing: Embracing representative learning design Effects of coaches' authentic leadership on athletes' training competition satisfaction: The mediating roles of psychological ownership and athlete engagement Training volume, intensity, and performance of world-class Chinese rowers prior to the 2019 world championships: A case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1