Intralesional Quadrivalent Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine Versus Candida Antigen in the Treatment of Multiple Recalcitrant Non-Genital Warts.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Dermatology practical & conceptual Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.5826/dpc.1402a66
Ibrahim Fouda, Hassan Abou Khodair Mohammed, Ghada Mohammed Yousef Mohammed
{"title":"Intralesional Quadrivalent Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine Versus Candida Antigen in the Treatment of Multiple Recalcitrant Non-Genital Warts.","authors":"Ibrahim Fouda, Hassan Abou Khodair Mohammed, Ghada Mohammed Yousef Mohammed","doi":"10.5826/dpc.1402a66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Warts are the most prevalent clinical manifestation of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) infections, which vary in morphological pattern depending on the site of the body affected.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intralesional quadrivalent HPV vaccine versus candida antigen in treatment of multiple recalcitrant non-genital warts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized-control clinical trial included 60 cases with multiple recalcitrant warts who were randomly distributed into three groups; Group I included 20 patients who received intralesional candida antigen at a dose of 0.3 mL of 1/1000 solution, Group II included 20 patients who received intralesional quadrivalent HPV vaccine at a dose of 0.3ml and Group III included 20 patients who received intralesional injection 0.3 ml of normal saline 0.9% as a control group). Each agent was injected at the base of the largest wart every three weeks until it was completely cleared, or for a total of four sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>the highest response rate was detected in the quadrivalent HPV vaccine group (75% complete response) followed by the candida vaccine group (40% complete response and 15% partial response). Also, regarding the distant response rate, the highest response rate was detected in the quadrivalent HPV vaccine group (72.7% complete response and 27.3% partial response) followed by the candida vaccine group (33.3% complete response and 50% partial response).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intralesional immunotherapy appears to be effective and safe in treating multiple recalcitrant non-genital warts, with intralesional quadrivalent HPV vaccine outperforming intralesional candida antigen.</p>","PeriodicalId":11168,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology practical & conceptual","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11135915/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology practical & conceptual","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5826/dpc.1402a66","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Warts are the most prevalent clinical manifestation of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) infections, which vary in morphological pattern depending on the site of the body affected.

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intralesional quadrivalent HPV vaccine versus candida antigen in treatment of multiple recalcitrant non-genital warts.

Methods: A randomized-control clinical trial included 60 cases with multiple recalcitrant warts who were randomly distributed into three groups; Group I included 20 patients who received intralesional candida antigen at a dose of 0.3 mL of 1/1000 solution, Group II included 20 patients who received intralesional quadrivalent HPV vaccine at a dose of 0.3ml and Group III included 20 patients who received intralesional injection 0.3 ml of normal saline 0.9% as a control group). Each agent was injected at the base of the largest wart every three weeks until it was completely cleared, or for a total of four sessions.

Results: the highest response rate was detected in the quadrivalent HPV vaccine group (75% complete response) followed by the candida vaccine group (40% complete response and 15% partial response). Also, regarding the distant response rate, the highest response rate was detected in the quadrivalent HPV vaccine group (72.7% complete response and 27.3% partial response) followed by the candida vaccine group (33.3% complete response and 50% partial response).

Conclusions: Intralesional immunotherapy appears to be effective and safe in treating multiple recalcitrant non-genital warts, with intralesional quadrivalent HPV vaccine outperforming intralesional candida antigen.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗多发性顽固性非生殖器疣的四价人乳头瘤病毒疫苗与念珠菌抗原的椎管内注射。
简介:尖锐湿疣是人类乳头瘤病毒(HPV)感染最常见的临床表现:尖锐湿疣是人类乳头瘤病毒(HPV)感染最常见的临床表现,其形态因患病部位而异:评估鞘内注射四价 HPV 疫苗与念珠菌抗原治疗多发性顽固性非生殖器疣的安全性和有效性:随机对照临床试验纳入了60例多发性顽固性尖锐湿疣患者,并将其随机分为三组:I组20例患者接受1/1000溶液0.3毫升剂量的念珠菌抗原鞘内注射,II组20例患者接受0.3毫升剂量的四价HPV疫苗鞘内注射,III组20例患者接受0.3毫升0.9%生理盐水鞘内注射(作为对照组)。结果:四价 HPV 疫苗组的反应率最高(75% 完全反应),其次是念珠菌疫苗组(40% 完全反应和 15%部分反应)。此外,在远期反应率方面,四价HPV疫苗组的反应率最高(72.7%完全反应,27.3%部分反应),其次是念珠菌疫苗组(33.3%完全反应,50%部分反应):穴内免疫疗法在治疗多发性顽固性非生殖器疣方面似乎既有效又安全,穴内注射四价HPV疫苗的疗效优于穴内注射念珠菌抗原。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
217
期刊最新文献
Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Actinic Keratosis. What is New for The Management for Sun-Damaged Skin. Importance of Both Clinical and Dermoscopic Findings in Predicting High-Risk Histopathological Subtype in Facial Basal Cell Carcinomas. Might Necrotic Keratinocytes Contribute to the Diagnosis and Pathogenesis of Psoriasis? A Rare Case of Young Patient With Keloid After Topical Treatment with Potassium Hydroxide 5% of Molluscum Contagiosum. Acne Keloidalis Nuchae: A Multicenter Retrospective Study of 142 Hispanic Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1