James E Noelker, Vitoria Abreu Ruozzi, Hunter M Craig, Jason P Sckrabulis, Thomas R Raffel
{"title":"Glove decontamination procedures to prevent pathogen and DNA cross-contamination among frogs.","authors":"James E Noelker, Vitoria Abreu Ruozzi, Hunter M Craig, Jason P Sckrabulis, Thomas R Raffel","doi":"10.3354/dao03793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Working with aquatic organisms often requires handling multiple individuals in a single session, potentially resulting in cross-contamination by live pathogens or DNA. Most researchers address this problem by disposing of gloves between animals. However, this generates excessive waste and may be impractical for processing very slippery animals that might be easier to handle with cotton gloves. We tested methods to decontaminate cotton or nitrile gloves after contamination with cultured Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) or after handling heavily Bd-infected Xenopus laevis with layered cotton and nitrile gloves. Bleach eliminated detectable Bd DNA from culture-contaminated nitrile gloves, but gloves retained detectable Bd DNA following ethanol disinfection. After handling a Bd-infected frog, Bd DNA contamination was greatly reduced by removal of the outer cotton glove, after which either bleach decontamination or ethanol decontamination followed by drying hands with a paper towel lowered Bd DNA below the detection threshold of our assay. These results provide new options to prevent pathogen or DNA cross-contamination, especially when handling slippery aquatic organisms. However, tradeoffs should be considered when selecting an animal handling procedure, such as the potential for cotton gloves to abrade amphibian skin or disrupt skin mucus. Disposing of gloves between animals should remain the gold standard for maintaining biosecurity in sensitive situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":11252,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of aquatic organisms","volume":"158 ","pages":"173-178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of aquatic organisms","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3354/dao03793","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Working with aquatic organisms often requires handling multiple individuals in a single session, potentially resulting in cross-contamination by live pathogens or DNA. Most researchers address this problem by disposing of gloves between animals. However, this generates excessive waste and may be impractical for processing very slippery animals that might be easier to handle with cotton gloves. We tested methods to decontaminate cotton or nitrile gloves after contamination with cultured Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) or after handling heavily Bd-infected Xenopus laevis with layered cotton and nitrile gloves. Bleach eliminated detectable Bd DNA from culture-contaminated nitrile gloves, but gloves retained detectable Bd DNA following ethanol disinfection. After handling a Bd-infected frog, Bd DNA contamination was greatly reduced by removal of the outer cotton glove, after which either bleach decontamination or ethanol decontamination followed by drying hands with a paper towel lowered Bd DNA below the detection threshold of our assay. These results provide new options to prevent pathogen or DNA cross-contamination, especially when handling slippery aquatic organisms. However, tradeoffs should be considered when selecting an animal handling procedure, such as the potential for cotton gloves to abrade amphibian skin or disrupt skin mucus. Disposing of gloves between animals should remain the gold standard for maintaining biosecurity in sensitive situations.
与水生生物打交道通常需要在一次工作中处理多个个体,这可能会导致活病原体或 DNA 的交叉感染。大多数研究人员通过在动物之间丢弃手套来解决这个问题。然而,这样做会产生过多的废物,而且对于处理非常滑溜的动物可能不切实际,因为使用棉手套可能更容易处理这些动物。我们测试了在棉手套或丁腈手套受到培养的巴特拉氏菌(Bd)污染后,或在使用分层棉手套和丁腈手套处理受到严重 Bd 感染的爪蟾后对其进行净化的方法。漂白剂消除了受培养物污染的丁腈手套中可检测到的 Bd DNA,但乙醇消毒后手套仍可检测到 Bd DNA。在处理受 Bd 感染的青蛙后,脱掉外层棉手套可大大减少 Bd DNA 污染,之后无论是漂白剂去污还是乙醇去污,再用纸巾擦干双手,都可将 Bd DNA 降低到检测阈值以下。这些结果为防止病原体或 DNA 交叉污染提供了新的选择,尤其是在处理湿滑的水生生物时。不过,在选择动物处理程序时应考虑折衷因素,如棉手套可能会磨损两栖动物皮肤或破坏皮肤粘液。在动物之间丢弃手套仍应是在敏感情况下保持生物安全的黄金标准。
期刊介绍:
DAO publishes Research Articles, Reviews, and Notes, as well as Comments/Reply Comments (for details see DAO 48:161), Theme Sections and Opinion Pieces. For details consult the Guidelines for Authors. Papers may cover all forms of life - animals, plants and microorganisms - in marine, limnetic and brackish habitats. DAO''s scope includes any research focusing on diseases in aquatic organisms, specifically:
-Diseases caused by coexisting organisms, e.g. viruses, bacteria, fungi, protistans, metazoans; characterization of pathogens
-Diseases caused by abiotic factors (critical intensities of environmental properties, including pollution)-
Diseases due to internal circumstances (innate, idiopathic, genetic)-
Diseases due to proliferative disorders (neoplasms)-
Disease diagnosis, treatment and prevention-
Molecular aspects of diseases-
Nutritional disorders-
Stress and physical injuries-
Epidemiology/epizootiology-
Parasitology-
Toxicology-
Diseases of aquatic organisms affecting human health and well-being (with the focus on the aquatic organism)-
Diseases as indicators of humanity''s detrimental impact on nature-
Genomics, proteomics and metabolomics of disease-
Immunology and disease prevention-
Animal welfare-
Zoonosis