EFFICACY OF A SEPSIS CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM IN IDENTIFYING PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE SHOCK Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-27 DOI:10.1097/SHK.0000000000002394
Yueh-Tseng Hou, Meng-Yu Wu, Yu-Long Chen, Tzu-Hung Liu, Ruei-Ting Cheng, Pei-Lan Hsu, An-Kuo Chao, Ching-Chieh Huang, Fei-Wen Cheng, Po-Lin Lai, I-Feng Wu, Giou-Teng Yiang
{"title":"EFFICACY OF A SEPSIS CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM IN IDENTIFYING PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT.","authors":"Yueh-Tseng Hou, Meng-Yu Wu, Yu-Long Chen, Tzu-Hung Liu, Ruei-Ting Cheng, Pei-Lan Hsu, An-Kuo Chao, Ching-Chieh Huang, Fei-Wen Cheng, Po-Lin Lai, I-Feng Wu, Giou-Teng Yiang","doi":"10.1097/SHK.0000000000002394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Background: Early prediction of sepsis onset is crucial for reducing mortality and the overall cost burden of sepsis treatment. Currently, few effective and accurate prediction tools are available for sepsis. Hence, in this study, we developed an effective sepsis clinical decision support system (S-CDSS) to assist emergency physicians to predict sepsis. Methods: This study included patients who had visited the emergency department (ED) of Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Taiwan, between January 1, 2020, and June 31, 2022. The patients were divided into a derivation cohort (n = 70,758) and a validation cohort (n = 27,545). The derivation cohort was subjected to 6-fold stratified cross-validation, reserving 20% of the data (n = 11,793) for model testing. The primary study outcome was a sepsis prediction ( International Classification of Diseases , Tenth Revision , Clinical Modification ) before discharge from the ED. The S-CDSS incorporated the LightGBM algorithm to ensure timely and accurate prediction of sepsis. The validation cohort was subjected to multivariate logistic regression to identify the associations of S-CDSS-based high- and medium-risk alerts with clinical outcomes in the overall patient cohort. For each clinical outcome in high- and medium-risk patients, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and accuracy of S-CDSS-based predictions. Results: The S-CDSS was integrated into our hospital information system. The system featured three risk warning labels (red, yellow, and white, indicating high, medium, and low risks, respectively) to alert emergency physicians. The sensitivity and specificity of the S-CDSS in the derivation cohort were 86.9% and 92.5%, respectively. In the validation cohort, high- and medium-risk alerts were significantly associated with all clinical outcomes, exhibiting high prediction specificity for intubation, general ward admission, intensive care unit admission, ED mortality, and in-hospital mortality (93.29%, 97.32%, 94.03%, 93.04%, and 93.97%, respectively). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the S-CDSS can effectively identify patients with suspected sepsis in the ED. Furthermore, S-CDSS-based predictions appear to be strongly associated with clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":21667,"journal":{"name":"SHOCK","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SHOCK","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000002394","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Early prediction of sepsis onset is crucial for reducing mortality and the overall cost burden of sepsis treatment. Currently, few effective and accurate prediction tools are available for sepsis. Hence, in this study, we developed an effective sepsis clinical decision support system (S-CDSS) to assist emergency physicians to predict sepsis. Methods: This study included patients who had visited the emergency department (ED) of Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Taiwan, between January 1, 2020, and June 31, 2022. The patients were divided into a derivation cohort (n = 70,758) and a validation cohort (n = 27,545). The derivation cohort was subjected to 6-fold stratified cross-validation, reserving 20% of the data (n = 11,793) for model testing. The primary study outcome was a sepsis prediction ( International Classification of Diseases , Tenth Revision , Clinical Modification ) before discharge from the ED. The S-CDSS incorporated the LightGBM algorithm to ensure timely and accurate prediction of sepsis. The validation cohort was subjected to multivariate logistic regression to identify the associations of S-CDSS-based high- and medium-risk alerts with clinical outcomes in the overall patient cohort. For each clinical outcome in high- and medium-risk patients, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and accuracy of S-CDSS-based predictions. Results: The S-CDSS was integrated into our hospital information system. The system featured three risk warning labels (red, yellow, and white, indicating high, medium, and low risks, respectively) to alert emergency physicians. The sensitivity and specificity of the S-CDSS in the derivation cohort were 86.9% and 92.5%, respectively. In the validation cohort, high- and medium-risk alerts were significantly associated with all clinical outcomes, exhibiting high prediction specificity for intubation, general ward admission, intensive care unit admission, ED mortality, and in-hospital mortality (93.29%, 97.32%, 94.03%, 93.04%, and 93.97%, respectively). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the S-CDSS can effectively identify patients with suspected sepsis in the ED. Furthermore, S-CDSS-based predictions appear to be strongly associated with clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
败血症临床决策支持系统在识别急诊科败血症患者方面的功效。
背景:早期预测败血症的发病对于降低死亡率和败血症治疗的总体成本负担至关重要。目前,几乎没有有效而准确的败血症预测工具。因此,在本研究中,我们开发了一种有效的败血症临床决策支持系统(S-CDSS),以协助急诊医生预测败血症:本研究纳入了 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 31 日期间在台湾台北慈济医院急诊科(ED)就诊的患者。这些患者被分为衍生队列(70758 人)和验证队列(27545 人)。对推导队列进行六倍分层交叉验证,保留20%的数据(n = 11,793)用于模型测试。主要研究结果是急诊室出院前的败血症预测(国际疾病分类第十版,临床修正版)。S-CDSS 纳入了 LightGBM 算法,以确保及时准确地预测脓毒症。对验证队列进行了多变量逻辑回归,以确定基于 S-CDSS 的高风险和中风险警报与整个患者队列的临床结果之间的关联。针对高危和中危患者的每种临床结果,我们计算了基于 S-CDSS 预测的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值、阳性和阴性似然比以及准确性:S-CDSS 已集成到我们医院的信息系统中。该系统有三个风险警告标签(红色、黄色和白色,分别表示高、中和低风险),以提醒急诊医生。在衍生队列中,S-CDSS 的灵敏度和特异度分别为 86.9% 和 92.5%。在验证队列中,高风险和中风险警报与所有临床结果均有显著相关性,对插管、入住普通病房、入住重症监护室、急诊室死亡率和院内死亡率的预测特异性较高(分别为 93.29%、97.32%、94.03%、93.04% 和 93.97%):我们的研究结果表明,S-CDSS 可以有效识别急诊室疑似败血症患者。此外,基于 S-CDSS 的预测似乎与败血症患者的临床预后密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SHOCK
SHOCK 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
199
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: SHOCK®: Injury, Inflammation, and Sepsis: Laboratory and Clinical Approaches includes studies of novel therapeutic approaches, such as immunomodulation, gene therapy, nutrition, and others. The mission of the Journal is to foster and promote multidisciplinary studies, both experimental and clinical in nature, that critically examine the etiology, mechanisms and novel therapeutics of shock-related pathophysiological conditions. Its purpose is to excel as a vehicle for timely publication in the areas of basic and clinical studies of shock, trauma, sepsis, inflammation, ischemia, and related pathobiological states, with particular emphasis on the biologic mechanisms that determine the response to such injury. Making such information available will ultimately facilitate improved care of the traumatized or septic individual.
期刊最新文献
Correcting the Carotid Flow Time with the Formula of Bazett: mind the units. Early Analysis of Endothelial Markers to predict Sepsis in the Emergency Department. Whole transcription analysis identified the regulation of hypoxia-inducible factors in monocytes with immune suppression: implications for clinical outcomes. EFFICACY OF A SEPSIS CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM IN IDENTIFYING PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT. CECAL SLURRY AS AN ALTERNATIVE MODEL TO CECAL LIGATION AND PUNCTURE FOR THE STUDY OF SEPSIS-INDUCED CARDIOVASCULAR DYSFUNCTION.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1