Sibling Availability, Sibling Sorting, and Subjective Health Among Chinese Adults.

IF 3.6 1区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY Demography Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1215/00703370-11376831
Haowei Wang, Ashton M Verdery, Rachel Margolis
{"title":"Sibling Availability, Sibling Sorting, and Subjective Health Among Chinese Adults.","authors":"Haowei Wang, Ashton M Verdery, Rachel Margolis","doi":"10.1215/00703370-11376831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite rising numbers of only children in China, little is known about their family dynamics and well-being in adulthood-for example, how often they marry other only children and whether those in siblingless families have worse or better health than others. Theoretical expectations produce opposing predictions: siblings might provide social and emotional support and reduce parental caregiving pressures, but only children might receive more support from parents and grandparents. Using the 2010 China Family Panel Study, we examine marital sorting on Chinese adults' number of siblings and test whether sibling availability and sibling sorting are associated with subjective physical and mental health. Despite general perceptions that China has an exceedingly high prevalence of adults with no siblings that might produce very small families, results demonstrate a low prevalence of siblingless couples (i.e., both spouses are only children). Married adults with no siblings or siblings-in-law have better subjective physical health but similar levels of subjective mental health relative to their counterparts with siblings. The health advantages of siblingless marital unions are greater for rural and female adults. Declining sibling prevalence in China will shape future family demographic dynamics but appears less detrimental to population health than sometimes assumed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48394,"journal":{"name":"Demography","volume":" ","pages":"797-827"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Demography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/00703370-11376831","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite rising numbers of only children in China, little is known about their family dynamics and well-being in adulthood-for example, how often they marry other only children and whether those in siblingless families have worse or better health than others. Theoretical expectations produce opposing predictions: siblings might provide social and emotional support and reduce parental caregiving pressures, but only children might receive more support from parents and grandparents. Using the 2010 China Family Panel Study, we examine marital sorting on Chinese adults' number of siblings and test whether sibling availability and sibling sorting are associated with subjective physical and mental health. Despite general perceptions that China has an exceedingly high prevalence of adults with no siblings that might produce very small families, results demonstrate a low prevalence of siblingless couples (i.e., both spouses are only children). Married adults with no siblings or siblings-in-law have better subjective physical health but similar levels of subjective mental health relative to their counterparts with siblings. The health advantages of siblingless marital unions are greater for rural and female adults. Declining sibling prevalence in China will shape future family demographic dynamics but appears less detrimental to population health than sometimes assumed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国成年人的兄弟姐妹可得性、兄弟姐妹排序与主观健康。
尽管中国的独生子女数量在不断增加,但人们对他们的家庭动态和成年后的福祉却知之甚少--例如,他们与其他独生子女结婚的频率,以及无兄弟姐妹家庭中的独生子女的健康状况是比其他人差还是更好。理论预期产生了相反的预测:兄弟姐妹可能会提供社会和情感支持,减轻父母的照顾压力,但独生子女可能会从父母和祖父母那里获得更多支持。通过 2010 年中国家庭面板研究,我们考察了中国成年人在兄弟姐妹数量上的婚姻排序,并检验了兄弟姐妹可得性和兄弟姐妹排序是否与主观身心健康相关。尽管人们普遍认为中国没有兄弟姐妹的成年人比例极高,可能会产生非常小的家庭,但研究结果表明,无兄弟姐妹夫妻(即夫妻双方都是独生子女)的比例很低。与有兄弟姐妹的成年人相比,没有兄弟姐妹或兄弟姐妹媳妇的已婚成年人的主观身体健康状况更好,但主观心理健康水平相似。对于农村和女性成年人来说,无兄弟姐妹婚姻的健康优势更大。中国兄弟姐妹比例的下降将影响未来的家庭人口动态,但对人口健康的损害似乎比有时假设的要小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Demography
Demography DEMOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Since its founding in 1964, the journal Demography has mirrored the vitality, diversity, high intellectual standard and wide impact of the field on which it reports. Demography presents the highest quality original research of scholars in a broad range of disciplines, including anthropology, biology, economics, geography, history, psychology, public health, sociology, and statistics. The journal encompasses a wide variety of methodological approaches to population research. Its geographic focus is global, with articles addressing demographic matters from around the planet. Its temporal scope is broad, as represented by research that explores demographic phenomena spanning the ages from the past to the present, and reaching toward the future. Authors whose work is published in Demography benefit from the wide audience of population scientists their research will reach. Also in 2011 Demography remains the most cited journal among population studies and demographic periodicals. Published bimonthly, Demography is the flagship journal of the Population Association of America, reaching the membership of one of the largest professional demographic associations in the world.
期刊最新文献
Why Are So Many U.S. Mothers Becoming Their Family's Primary Economic Support? A Data Portrait of Cisgender, Transgender, and Gender-Nonconforming Populations in the United States: A Research Note. Daily Diversity Flows: Racial and Ethnic Context Between Home and Work. Assessing Electronic Health Records for Describing Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities: A Research Note. Do Migrants Exhibit More Grit? A Research Note.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1