Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Two Formulations of Azithromycin Tablets: A Randomized, Single-Dose, Three-Period, Crossover Study in Healthy Chinese Volunteers Under Fasting and Fed Conditions.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Drugs in Research & Development Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-30 DOI:10.1007/s40268-024-00464-8
Yingrong Chen, Libing Ye, Jue Mei, Mengli Tian, Min Xu, Qiuyue Jin, Xiang Yu, Shuixin Yang, Jie Wang
{"title":"Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Two Formulations of Azithromycin Tablets: A Randomized, Single-Dose, Three-Period, Crossover Study in Healthy Chinese Volunteers Under Fasting and Fed Conditions.","authors":"Yingrong Chen, Libing Ye, Jue Mei, Mengli Tian, Min Xu, Qiuyue Jin, Xiang Yu, Shuixin Yang, Jie Wang","doi":"10.1007/s40268-024-00464-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Azithromycin is the first azalide antibiotic that is related to the macrolide family of antibiotics. Bioequivalence studies in China are initiated by the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA), which supports a generic consistency evaluation program for ensuring that generic products manufactured in China meet the required standards and provide equivalent therapeutic effects to their reference products. This study aimed to assess the bioequivalence of two azithromycin tablets under both fasting and fed conditions in healthy Chinese volunteers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, open-label, single-dose, randomized, three-way crossover trial with two independent groups (fasting group and fed group). A total of 72 healthy Chinese subjects (36 subjects in the fasting state and 36 subjects in the fed state) were enrolled and randomized to treatment. Blood samples were collected from 0 to 120 h after a single oral dose of a 250-mg generic azithromycin tablet (test, T) or branded azithromycin tablet (reference, R). The plasma concentrations of azithromycin were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC‒MS/MS). A non-compartmental analysis method was used to estimate the pharmacokinetic parameters. Adverse events were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a fasting state, the bioequivalence of maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) was evaluated using the reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) approach (within-subject standard deviation, S<sub>WR</sub> > 0.294), and the bioequivalence of area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the time of the last measurable plasma concentration (AUC<sub>0-t</sub>) and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>) were evaluated by the average bioequivalence (ABE) method (S<sub>WR</sub> <  0.294). The geometric mean ratio (GMR) of T/R for C<sub>max</sub> was 106.49%, while the 95% upper confidence bound was <  0. The GMRs of AUC<sub>0-t</sub> and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> were 103.34% and 101.28%, and the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the test/reference were 95.90-111.35%/94.85-108.15%, respectively. In the fed state, the RSABE approach was applied to estimate the bioequivalence of C<sub>max</sub> (S<sub>WR</sub> >0.294), and the ABE approach was applied to estimate the bioequivalence of AUC<sub>0-t</sub> and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> (S<sub>WR</sub> <  0.294). The GMR for C<sub>max</sub> was 99.80%, while the 95% upper confidence bound value was <  0. The GMRs of AUC<sub>0-t</sub> and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> were 97.07% and 98.15%, and the 90% CIs of the T/R were 90.02-104.68% and 90.66-106.25%, respectively. All adverse events were mild and transient.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The trial indicated that the test and the reference azithromycin tablets were bioequivalent and well tolerated in healthy Chinese volunteers under both fasting and fed conditions.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials, ChiCTR2300071630 (retrospectively registered in 19/05/2023).</p>","PeriodicalId":49258,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Research & Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11315817/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs in Research & Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40268-024-00464-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Azithromycin is the first azalide antibiotic that is related to the macrolide family of antibiotics. Bioequivalence studies in China are initiated by the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA), which supports a generic consistency evaluation program for ensuring that generic products manufactured in China meet the required standards and provide equivalent therapeutic effects to their reference products. This study aimed to assess the bioequivalence of two azithromycin tablets under both fasting and fed conditions in healthy Chinese volunteers.

Methods: This was a single-center, open-label, single-dose, randomized, three-way crossover trial with two independent groups (fasting group and fed group). A total of 72 healthy Chinese subjects (36 subjects in the fasting state and 36 subjects in the fed state) were enrolled and randomized to treatment. Blood samples were collected from 0 to 120 h after a single oral dose of a 250-mg generic azithromycin tablet (test, T) or branded azithromycin tablet (reference, R). The plasma concentrations of azithromycin were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC‒MS/MS). A non-compartmental analysis method was used to estimate the pharmacokinetic parameters. Adverse events were documented.

Results: In a fasting state, the bioequivalence of maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was evaluated using the reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) approach (within-subject standard deviation, SWR > 0.294), and the bioequivalence of area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the time of the last measurable plasma concentration (AUC0-t) and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞) were evaluated by the average bioequivalence (ABE) method (SWR <  0.294). The geometric mean ratio (GMR) of T/R for Cmax was 106.49%, while the 95% upper confidence bound was <  0. The GMRs of AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ were 103.34% and 101.28%, and the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the test/reference were 95.90-111.35%/94.85-108.15%, respectively. In the fed state, the RSABE approach was applied to estimate the bioequivalence of Cmax (SWR >0.294), and the ABE approach was applied to estimate the bioequivalence of AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ (SWR <  0.294). The GMR for Cmax was 99.80%, while the 95% upper confidence bound value was <  0. The GMRs of AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ were 97.07% and 98.15%, and the 90% CIs of the T/R were 90.02-104.68% and 90.66-106.25%, respectively. All adverse events were mild and transient.

Conclusions: The trial indicated that the test and the reference azithromycin tablets were bioequivalent and well tolerated in healthy Chinese volunteers under both fasting and fed conditions.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials, ChiCTR2300071630 (retrospectively registered in 19/05/2023).

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种阿奇霉素片剂的药代动力学和生物等效性:在空腹和进食条件下对中国健康志愿者进行的一项随机、单剂量、三期、交叉研究。
背景和目的:阿奇霉素是第一个与大环内酯类抗生素相关的叠氮抗生素。中国的生物等效性研究由国家医药管理局(NMPA)发起,该局支持仿制药一致性评价项目,以确保在中国生产的仿制药符合规定的标准,并提供与参比产品等效的治疗效果。本研究旨在评估两种阿奇霉素片剂在中国健康志愿者空腹和进食条件下的生物等效性:这是一项单中心、开放标签、单剂量、随机、三向交叉试验,分为两个独立的试验组(空腹组和进食组)。共有 72 名中国健康受试者(36 名空腹状态受试者和 36 名进食状态受试者)被纳入试验并随机接受治疗。单次口服 250 毫克普通阿奇霉素片剂(试验组,T)或品牌阿奇霉素片剂(参照组,R)后 0 至 120 小时采集血样。采用高效液相色谱-串联质谱法(HPLC-MS/MS)测定阿奇霉素的血浆浓度。采用非室分析法估算药代动力学参数。对不良反应进行了记录:在空腹状态下,采用参考比例平均生物等效性(RSABE)方法评估了最大血浆浓度(Cmax)的生物等效性(受试者内标准偏差,SWR > 0.294),用平均生物等效性(ABE)法评估了从时间 0 到最后一次可测量血浆浓度时间的浓度时间曲线下面积(AUC0-t)和从时间 0 外推至无穷大的浓度时间曲线下面积(AUC0-∞)的生物等效性(SWR < 0.294)。Cmax的T/R几何平均比值(GMR)为106.49%,95%置信上限小于0;AUC0-t和AUC0-∞的GMR分别为103.34%和101.28%,试验/参照的90%置信区间(CI)分别为95.90-111.35%/94.85-108.15%。在进食状态下,采用 RSABE 法估计 Cmax 的生物等效性(SWR >0.294),采用 ABE 法估计 AUC0-t 和 AUC0-∞ 的生物等效性(SWR <0.294)。Cmax的GMR为99.80%,95%的置信区间上限值小于0;AUC0-t和AUC0-∞的GMR分别为97.07%和98.15%,T/R的90%CI分别为90.02-104.68%和90.66-106.25%。所有不良反应均为轻微和一过性:试验表明,在空腹和进食条件下,试验用阿奇霉素片和参比阿奇霉素片在中国健康志愿者中的生物等效性和耐受性良好:试验注册:Clinicaltrials,ChiCTR2300071630(回顾性注册于2023年5月19日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drugs in Research & Development
Drugs in Research & Development Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs in R&D is an international, peer reviewed, open access, online only journal, and provides timely information from all phases of drug research and development that will inform clinical practice. Healthcare decision makers are thus provided with knowledge about the developing place of a drug in therapy. The Journal includes: Clinical research on new and established drugs; Preclinical research of direct relevance to clinical drug development; Short communications and case study reports that meet the above criteria will also be considered; Reviews may also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Assessment of Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP)-Mediated Drug-Drug Interactions of Sepiapterin with Curcumin and Rosuvastatin in Healthy Volunteers. Trametinib Sensitivity is Defined by a Myeloid Differentiation Profile in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Pharmacokinetics, Mass Balance, and Biotransformation of [14C]tinengotinib, A Novel Multi-target Kinase Inhibitor, in Healthy Subjects. Comparative Analytical Evaluation of the Proposed Biosimilar FYB206 and its Reference Medicinal Product Keytruda®. Effect of Chronic Dolutegravir Administration on the Trace Amine Profile in Wistar Rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1