Is an earlier strategy for harvesting peripheral blood stem cells in healthy allogeneic donors feasible?

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY Transfusion and Apheresis Science Pub Date : 2024-05-27 DOI:10.1016/j.transci.2024.103956
Samet Yaman, Ersin Bozan, Sema Seçilmiş, Burcu Aslan Candır, Ali Kılınç, Semih Başcı, Tuğçe Nur Yiğenoğlu, Merih Kızıl Çakar, Mehmet Sinan Dal, Fevzi Altuntaş
{"title":"Is an earlier strategy for harvesting peripheral blood stem cells in healthy allogeneic donors feasible?","authors":"Samet Yaman,&nbsp;Ersin Bozan,&nbsp;Sema Seçilmiş,&nbsp;Burcu Aslan Candır,&nbsp;Ali Kılınç,&nbsp;Semih Başcı,&nbsp;Tuğçe Nur Yiğenoğlu,&nbsp;Merih Kızıl Çakar,&nbsp;Mehmet Sinan Dal,&nbsp;Fevzi Altuntaş","doi":"10.1016/j.transci.2024.103956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) mobilization with granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) for healthy donors is generally performed at 5th day. However, earlier collection is sometimes feasible, raising the question of whether to initiate apheresis early to limit further G-CSF exposure, while considering the risk of mobilization failure. In the current study, we examined the factors predicting successful 4th day collection and developed a model that can be used practically.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>The study was carried out by obtaining the data of PBSC mobilizations performed between January 2009 and September 2022 in our transplantation center.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 141 healthy donors with a median donor age of 32 (18–64) were included. Adequate mobilization was achieved in 115 (81.6 %) patients. Median peripheral CD34 + cell count was 69.4/μL in the adequate mobilization group and 46/μL in the mobilization failure group (p &lt; 0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that donor/recipient weight ratio and the 4th day peripheral CD34 + cell count≥ 50/μL were independent markers for 4th day collection success. A predictive model of our center including these parameters was available with 0.765 sensitivity and 0.968 specificity [(AUC):0.948 (95 % CI, 0.90–0.99), p &lt; 0.001].</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The result of the current study shows that peripheral 4th day collection can be performed in selected donors, taking into account peripheral CD34+ cell count and donor/recipient weight ratio. In addition, using these indicators, new predictive models can be created that may assist clinicians in daily practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49422,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion and Apheresis Science","volume":"63 4","pages":"Article 103956"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion and Apheresis Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1473050224001241","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) mobilization with granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) for healthy donors is generally performed at 5th day. However, earlier collection is sometimes feasible, raising the question of whether to initiate apheresis early to limit further G-CSF exposure, while considering the risk of mobilization failure. In the current study, we examined the factors predicting successful 4th day collection and developed a model that can be used practically.

Patients and methods

The study was carried out by obtaining the data of PBSC mobilizations performed between January 2009 and September 2022 in our transplantation center.

Results

A total of 141 healthy donors with a median donor age of 32 (18–64) were included. Adequate mobilization was achieved in 115 (81.6 %) patients. Median peripheral CD34 + cell count was 69.4/μL in the adequate mobilization group and 46/μL in the mobilization failure group (p < 0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that donor/recipient weight ratio and the 4th day peripheral CD34 + cell count≥ 50/μL were independent markers for 4th day collection success. A predictive model of our center including these parameters was available with 0.765 sensitivity and 0.968 specificity [(AUC):0.948 (95 % CI, 0.90–0.99), p < 0.001].

Conclusion

The result of the current study shows that peripheral 4th day collection can be performed in selected donors, taking into account peripheral CD34+ cell count and donor/recipient weight ratio. In addition, using these indicators, new predictive models can be created that may assist clinicians in daily practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提前采集健康异体捐献者外周血干细胞的策略是否可行?
简介使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)动员健康供体的外周血干细胞(PBSC)一般在第5天进行。然而,提前采集有时也是可行的,这就提出了一个问题:在考虑动员失败风险的同时,是否应尽早启动无细胞采集,以限制G-CSF的进一步暴露。在本研究中,我们研究了预测第 4 天成功采集的因素,并建立了一个可实际应用的模型:研究通过获取 2009 年 1 月至 2022 年 9 月期间在我们移植中心进行的 PBSC 动员的数据来进行:共纳入141名健康供体,供体年龄中位数为32岁(18-64岁)。115名患者(81.6%)实现了充分动员。充分动员组的外周 CD34 + 细胞计数中位数为 69.4 个/μL,动员失败组为 46 个/μL(P 结论:本研究结果表明,外周 CD34 + 细胞计数中位数在充分动员组和动员失败组之间存在显著差异:目前的研究结果表明,考虑到外周 CD34+ 细胞计数和供体/受体体重比,可以对选定的供体进行外周第 4 天采集。此外,利用这些指标还可以建立新的预测模型,为临床医生的日常工作提供帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
181
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Transfusion and Apheresis Science brings comprehensive and up-to-date information to physicians and health care professionals involved in the rapidly changing fields of transfusion medicine, hemostasis and apheresis. The journal presents original articles relating to scientific and clinical studies in the areas of immunohematology, transfusion practice, bleeding and thrombotic disorders and both therapeutic and donor apheresis including hematopoietic stem cells. Topics covered include the collection and processing of blood, compatibility testing and guidelines for the use of blood products, as well as screening for and transmission of blood-borne diseases. All areas of apheresis - therapeutic and collection - are also addressed. We would like to specifically encourage allied health professionals in this area to submit manuscripts that relate to improved patient and donor care, technical aspects and educational issues. Transfusion and Apheresis Science features a "Theme" section which includes, in each issue, a group of papers designed to review a specific topic of current importance in transfusion and hemostasis for the discussion of topical issues specific to apheresis and focuses on the operators'' viewpoint. Another section is "What''s Happening" which provides informal reporting of activities in the field. In addition, brief case reports and Letters to the Editor, as well as reviews of meetings and events of general interest, and a listing of recent patents make the journal a complete source of information for practitioners of transfusion, hemostasis and apheresis science. Immediate dissemination of important information is ensured by the commitment of Transfusion and Apheresis Science to rapid publication of both symposia and submitted papers.
期刊最新文献
Adapting the Cohn 6th cold ethanol fractionation method for small plasma pools: An innovative platform for developing hyperimmunoglobulin products against antibiotic-resistant infections in resource-limited settings Colleagues from around the world have given generously of their time and expertise to produce The 2024 International Survey of Platelet Products and Practice and two related manuscripts in this issue of Transfusion and Apheresis Science Editorial commentary CAPRIN2 RNA-binding protein contributes to balance erythroid production: Implications in the fine-tuning of proteostasis during erythropoiesis Update on the measurement of "soluble angiotensin converting enzyme 2" in plasma and its emerging significance as a novel biomarker of cardiovascular and kidney diseases: A concise commentary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1