Predicting lever press in a vibrotactile yes/no detection task from S1 cortex of freely behaving rats by µECoG arrays.

Deniz Kılınç Bülbül, Burak Güçlü
{"title":"Predicting lever press in a vibrotactile yes/no detection task from S1 cortex of freely behaving rats by µECoG arrays.","authors":"Deniz Kılınç Bülbül, Burak Güçlü","doi":"10.1080/08990220.2024.2358522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) may help patients with severe neurological deficits communicate with the external world. Based on microelectrocorticography (µECoG) data recorded from the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) of unrestrained behaving rats, this study attempts to decode lever presses in a psychophysical detection task by using machine learning algorithms.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>16-channel Pt-Ir microelectrode arrays were implanted on the S1 of two rats, and µECoG was recorded during a vibrotactile yes/no detection task. For this task, the rats were trained to press the right lever when they detected the vibrotactile stimulus and the left lever when they did not. The multichannel µECoG data was analysed offline by time-frequency methods and its features were used for binary classification of the lever press at each trial. Several machine learning algorithms were tested as such.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The psychophysical sensitivities (A') were similar and low for both rats (0.58). Rat 2 (<i>B</i>'': -0.11) had higher bias for the right lever than Rat 1 (<i>B</i>'': - 0.01). The lever presses could be predicted with accuracies over 66% with all the tested algorithms, and the highest average accuracy (78%) was with the support vector machine.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the recent studies, sensory feedback increases the benefit of the BCIs. The current proof-of-concept study shows that lever presses can be decoded from the S1; therefore, this area may be utilised for a bidirectional BCI in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":94211,"journal":{"name":"Somatosensory & motor research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Somatosensory & motor research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08990220.2024.2358522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim of the study: Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) may help patients with severe neurological deficits communicate with the external world. Based on microelectrocorticography (µECoG) data recorded from the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) of unrestrained behaving rats, this study attempts to decode lever presses in a psychophysical detection task by using machine learning algorithms.

Materials and methods: 16-channel Pt-Ir microelectrode arrays were implanted on the S1 of two rats, and µECoG was recorded during a vibrotactile yes/no detection task. For this task, the rats were trained to press the right lever when they detected the vibrotactile stimulus and the left lever when they did not. The multichannel µECoG data was analysed offline by time-frequency methods and its features were used for binary classification of the lever press at each trial. Several machine learning algorithms were tested as such.

Results: The psychophysical sensitivities (A') were similar and low for both rats (0.58). Rat 2 (B'': -0.11) had higher bias for the right lever than Rat 1 (B'': - 0.01). The lever presses could be predicted with accuracies over 66% with all the tested algorithms, and the highest average accuracy (78%) was with the support vector machine.

Conclusion: According to the recent studies, sensory feedback increases the benefit of the BCIs. The current proof-of-concept study shows that lever presses can be decoded from the S1; therefore, this area may be utilised for a bidirectional BCI in the future.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过 µECoG 阵列从自由行为大鼠的 S1 皮层预测振动触觉 "是/否 "检测任务中的杠杆按压。
研究目的脑机接口(BCI)可帮助严重神经功能障碍患者与外界交流。材料与方法:在两只大鼠的S1上植入了16通道铂-铱微电极阵列,并在振动触觉 "是"/"否 "检测任务中记录了μECoG。在这项任务中,训练大鼠在检测到振动触觉刺激时按下右侧杠杆,而在没有检测到振动触觉刺激时按下左侧杠杆。多通道 µECoG 数据通过时频方法进行离线分析,其特征用于对每次试验中的杠杆按压进行二元分类。对几种机器学习算法进行了测试:两只大鼠的心理物理灵敏度(A')相似且较低(0.58)。与大鼠 1(B'':- 0.01)相比,大鼠 2(B'':-0.11)对右杠杆的偏差更大。所有测试算法对杠杆按压的预测准确率均超过 66%,其中支持向量机的平均准确率最高(78%):结论:根据最近的研究,感官反馈会增加 BCIs 的益处。目前的概念验证研究表明,杠杆按压可从 S1 解码;因此,该区域将来可用于双向 BCI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is predictability of the conditioning stimulus (CS) a critical factor in conditioned pain modulation (CPM)? Comparison of the acute effects of different techniques on the ankle joint range of motion in healthy older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Predicting lever press in a vibrotactile yes/no detection task from S1 cortex of freely behaving rats by µECoG arrays. Effects of inter-stimulus and inter-trial intervals on somatosensory gating. Descending motor command to prime mover of dependent finger induces tactile gating in target and distant non-target finger.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1