Light exposure profiles differ between myopes and non-myopes outside school hours.

IF 2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY BMJ Open Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001469
Rohit Dhakal, John G Lawrenson, Byki Huntjens, Rakhee Shah, Pavan Kumar Verkicharla
{"title":"Light exposure profiles differ between myopes and non-myopes outside school hours.","authors":"Rohit Dhakal, John G Lawrenson, Byki Huntjens, Rakhee Shah, Pavan Kumar Verkicharla","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Considering the putative role of light in myopia, and variations in socioeconomic, lifestyle, educational and environmental factors across ethnicities, we objectively investigated light exposure patterns in Indian school children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The light exposure profile of 143 school children (9-15 years, 50 myopes) recorded using a validated wearable light tracker for six continuous days was analysed. Additional data for non-school days were available for 87 children (26 myopes). The illuminance exposure levels, time spent outdoors and epoch (number of times participant is exposed to a predefined range of lux level per day) were compared between myopes and non-myopes across different light conditions: ≥1000, ≥3000, ≥5000 and ≥10 000 lux. For school days, light exposure profiles during (1) before school, school and after school hours; and (2) class, break and transition (when a student travels to and from school) time were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall median (IQR) daily illuminance exposure level, time spent outdoors and epochs at outdoors (≥1000 lux) were 807 (507-1079) lux/day, 46 (30-64) min/day and 9 (6-12) times/day, respectively. The daily illuminance exposure on non-school days was significantly higher in non-myopes than myopes (6369 (4508-9112) vs 5623 (2616-6929) lux/day, p=0.04). During transition time (school days), non-myopes had significantly higher illuminance exposure (910 (388-1479) vs 550 (263-1098) lux/day, p=0.04), spent more time outdoors (25 (10-43) vs 14 (4-29) min/day, p=0.01) and had higher outdoor epochs (6 (4-11) vs 5 (2-8) times/day, p=0.01) than myopes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A small but significant difference in illuminance exposure, time spent outdoors and epoch was noted between myopes and non-myopes during transition time, which may have implications in myopia control.</p>","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11138295/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Considering the putative role of light in myopia, and variations in socioeconomic, lifestyle, educational and environmental factors across ethnicities, we objectively investigated light exposure patterns in Indian school children.

Methods: The light exposure profile of 143 school children (9-15 years, 50 myopes) recorded using a validated wearable light tracker for six continuous days was analysed. Additional data for non-school days were available for 87 children (26 myopes). The illuminance exposure levels, time spent outdoors and epoch (number of times participant is exposed to a predefined range of lux level per day) were compared between myopes and non-myopes across different light conditions: ≥1000, ≥3000, ≥5000 and ≥10 000 lux. For school days, light exposure profiles during (1) before school, school and after school hours; and (2) class, break and transition (when a student travels to and from school) time were analysed.

Results: The overall median (IQR) daily illuminance exposure level, time spent outdoors and epochs at outdoors (≥1000 lux) were 807 (507-1079) lux/day, 46 (30-64) min/day and 9 (6-12) times/day, respectively. The daily illuminance exposure on non-school days was significantly higher in non-myopes than myopes (6369 (4508-9112) vs 5623 (2616-6929) lux/day, p=0.04). During transition time (school days), non-myopes had significantly higher illuminance exposure (910 (388-1479) vs 550 (263-1098) lux/day, p=0.04), spent more time outdoors (25 (10-43) vs 14 (4-29) min/day, p=0.01) and had higher outdoor epochs (6 (4-11) vs 5 (2-8) times/day, p=0.01) than myopes.

Conclusions: A small but significant difference in illuminance exposure, time spent outdoors and epoch was noted between myopes and non-myopes during transition time, which may have implications in myopia control.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
近视眼和非近视眼在课余时间的光照情况不同。
目的:考虑到光线对近视的潜在作用,以及不同种族在社会经济、生活方式、教育和环境因素方面的差异,我们对印度学童的光线照射模式进行了客观调查:方法: 我们分析了 143 名学龄儿童(9-15 岁,50 名近视儿童)连续六天使用经过验证的可穿戴光线跟踪器记录的光线照射情况。此外,还获得了 87 名儿童(26 名近视儿童)非上学日的数据。比较了近视眼和非近视眼在不同光照条件下(≥1000、≥3000、≥5000 和≥10000 勒克斯)的照度暴露水平、户外活动时间和历时(参与者每天暴露在预定范围勒克斯水平下的次数)。对学生上学日的光照情况进行了分析:(1) 上学前、上学和放学时间;(2) 上课、课间休息和过渡时间(学生往返学校的时间):结果表明:每日照度水平、户外活动时间和户外活动时间(≥1000 勒克斯)的总体中位数(IQR)分别为 807(507-1079)勒克斯/天、46(30-64)分钟/天和 9(6-12)次/天。在非上学日,非近视眼每天的照度明显高于近视眼(6369 (4508-9112) vs 5623 (2616-6929) 勒克斯/天,P=0.04)。在过渡时间(上学日),非近视眼的照度明显高于近视眼(910 (388-1479) vs 550 (263-1098) 勒克斯/天,p=0.04),户外活动时间更长(25 (10-43) vs 14 (4-29) 分钟/天,p=0.01),户外活动时间更长(6 (4-11) vs 5 (2-8) 次/天,p=0.01):结论:近视眼和非近视眼在过渡时期的光照度、户外活动时间和历时方面存在微小但明显的差异,这可能会对近视控制产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
BMJ Open Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
104
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigation of choroidal vascular alterations in eyes with myopia using ultrawidefield optical coherence tomography angiography. Recent advances in the application of artificial intelligence in age-related macular degeneration. Network-based hub biomarker discovery for glaucoma. Investigating the effects of simulated high altitude on colour discrimination. Total retinal thickness is an important factor in evaluating diabetic retinal neurodegeneration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1