Gastrointestinal pain: A systematic review of temporal summation of pain paradigms and outcomes

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY European Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1002/ejp.2283
Danielle Huisman, Michael Mansfield, Tatum M. Cummins, Rona Moss-Morris, Stephen B. McMahon, Kirsty Bannister
{"title":"Gastrointestinal pain: A systematic review of temporal summation of pain paradigms and outcomes","authors":"Danielle Huisman,&nbsp;Michael Mansfield,&nbsp;Tatum M. Cummins,&nbsp;Rona Moss-Morris,&nbsp;Stephen B. McMahon,&nbsp;Kirsty Bannister","doi":"10.1002/ejp.2283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Since targeted treatment for gastrointestinal pain is elusive, identifying the mechanistic underpinning of this pain type is important. Facilitation of spinal neuronal responses underpins certain pain types, and the psychophysical temporal summation of pain (TSP) paradigm provides a proxy measure of spinal facilitatory processes. Our aim was to systematically review whether facilitated TSP is a feature of gastrointestinal pain in patients with, or pain-free people experiencing experimentally induced, gastrointestinal pain.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Databases and Data Treatment</h3>\n \n <p>EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsychInfo, CINAHL, and Web of Science were systematically searched, from inception to July 2023, for human studies reporting TSP paradigm outcomes in the context of gastrointestinal pain. The Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional studies was used for quality assessment and applied independently by two researchers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fifteen papers consisting of cross-sectional (<i>n</i> = 6), case–control (<i>n</i> = 8), and retrospective cohort (<i>n</i> = 1) studies, were included. Thirteen studies investigated TSP in people with gastrointestinal pain with (<i>n</i> = 5) or without (<i>n</i> = 8) defined pathology. Two studies evoked TSP by repetitive gut stimulation in people undergoing abdominal medical procedures. Preliminary evidence showed that facilitated TSP correlated with the presence of functional gastrointestinal pain in women, and those with a history of trauma. No effect was observed in people with inflammatory bowel disease, although it was often unclear if they experienced pain.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>It is not possible to conclude whether facilitated TSP is a feature of gastrointestinal pain. We recommend that subgroup findings are corroborated and that TSP paradigms are standardized in order that direct comparisons between studies may be made.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance Statement</h3>\n \n <p>Evidence indicated that pain facilitatory processes, as evidenced by a facilitated TSP outcome, contribute to functional gastrointestinal pain in women and those with a history of trauma. However, heterogeneity of study populations and paradigms precluded statistical synthesis and findings would need be corroborated. Studies exploring facilitatory processes in people with inflammatory bowel diseases did not report significant results, but pain is not a given in these conditions and, conversely, may be driven by peripheral inflammation during active disease. This should be taken in consideration in future explorations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Registration Review</h3>\n \n <p>PROSPERO CRD42022341845.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":"28 9","pages":"1450-1467"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejp.2283","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejp.2283","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objective

Since targeted treatment for gastrointestinal pain is elusive, identifying the mechanistic underpinning of this pain type is important. Facilitation of spinal neuronal responses underpins certain pain types, and the psychophysical temporal summation of pain (TSP) paradigm provides a proxy measure of spinal facilitatory processes. Our aim was to systematically review whether facilitated TSP is a feature of gastrointestinal pain in patients with, or pain-free people experiencing experimentally induced, gastrointestinal pain.

Databases and Data Treatment

EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsychInfo, CINAHL, and Web of Science were systematically searched, from inception to July 2023, for human studies reporting TSP paradigm outcomes in the context of gastrointestinal pain. The Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional studies was used for quality assessment and applied independently by two researchers.

Results

Fifteen papers consisting of cross-sectional (n = 6), case–control (n = 8), and retrospective cohort (n = 1) studies, were included. Thirteen studies investigated TSP in people with gastrointestinal pain with (n = 5) or without (n = 8) defined pathology. Two studies evoked TSP by repetitive gut stimulation in people undergoing abdominal medical procedures. Preliminary evidence showed that facilitated TSP correlated with the presence of functional gastrointestinal pain in women, and those with a history of trauma. No effect was observed in people with inflammatory bowel disease, although it was often unclear if they experienced pain.

Conclusions

It is not possible to conclude whether facilitated TSP is a feature of gastrointestinal pain. We recommend that subgroup findings are corroborated and that TSP paradigms are standardized in order that direct comparisons between studies may be made.

Significance Statement

Evidence indicated that pain facilitatory processes, as evidenced by a facilitated TSP outcome, contribute to functional gastrointestinal pain in women and those with a history of trauma. However, heterogeneity of study populations and paradigms precluded statistical synthesis and findings would need be corroborated. Studies exploring facilitatory processes in people with inflammatory bowel diseases did not report significant results, but pain is not a given in these conditions and, conversely, may be driven by peripheral inflammation during active disease. This should be taken in consideration in future explorations.

Registration Review

PROSPERO CRD42022341845.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胃肠道疼痛:疼痛范例和结果的时间总和系统回顾。
背景和目的:由于胃肠道疼痛的靶向治疗难以实现,因此确定这种疼痛类型的机理基础非常重要。脊髓神经元反应的促进是某些疼痛类型的基础,而疼痛的心理物理时间总和(TSP)范式提供了脊髓促进过程的替代测量方法。我们的目的是系统地研究胃肠道疼痛患者或无痛者在实验诱发胃肠道疼痛时,促进性 TSP 是否是胃肠道疼痛的一个特征:系统检索了 EMBASE、MEDLINE、PsychInfo、CINAHL 和 Web of Science 从开始到 2023 年 7 月期间报告胃肠道疼痛 TSP 范例结果的人类研究。横断面研究评估工具用于质量评估,由两名研究人员独立应用:结果:共纳入 15 篇论文,包括横断面研究(6 篇)、病例对照研究(8 篇)和回顾性队列研究(1 篇)。有 13 项研究调查了有明确病理(5 项)或无明确病理(8 项)的胃肠道疼痛患者的 TSP。两项研究通过对正在接受腹部医疗程序的人进行重复肠道刺激来诱发 TSP。初步证据显示,促进 TSP 与女性和有外伤史的人出现功能性胃肠道疼痛有关。对患有炎症性肠病的人没有观察到任何影响,尽管他们是否会感到疼痛往往并不清楚:目前还无法断定促进性 TSP 是否是胃肠道疼痛的一个特征。我们建议对亚组研究结果进行确证,并对 TSP 范式进行标准化,以便对不同研究进行直接比较:有证据表明,促进疼痛的过程,如促进 TSP 结果所证明的,是女性和有外伤史者功能性胃肠道疼痛的原因。然而,研究人群和研究范式的异质性排除了统计综合的可能性,研究结果需要得到证实。对炎症性肠病患者的促进过程进行探讨的研究没有报告显著的结果,但疼痛在这些疾病中并非必然,相反,在疾病活动期间,疼痛可能是由外周炎症引起的。在未来的探索中应考虑到这一点:PROPERCO CRD42022341845.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Pain
European Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Pain (EJP) publishes clinical and basic science research papers relevant to all aspects of pain and its management, including specialties such as anaesthesia, dentistry, neurology and neurosurgery, orthopaedics, palliative care, pharmacology, physiology, psychiatry, psychology and rehabilitation; socio-economic aspects of pain are also covered. Regular sections in the journal are as follows: • Editorials and Commentaries • Position Papers and Guidelines • Reviews • Original Articles • Letters • Bookshelf The journal particularly welcomes clinical trials, which are published on an occasional basis. Research articles are published under the following subject headings: • Neurobiology • Neurology • Experimental Pharmacology • Clinical Pharmacology • Psychology • Behavioural Therapy • Epidemiology • Cancer Pain • Acute Pain • Clinical Trials.
期刊最新文献
Cycling sensitivity across migraine phases: A longitudinal case-control study. Preoperative resting-state electrophysiological signals predict acute but not chronic postoperative pain. Expectation of analgesia increases the inhibitory response of conditioned pain modulation in healthy participants who at baseline have a non-inhibitory profile. Correction to 'Systematic review and co-ordinate based meta-analysis to summarize the utilization of functional brain imaging in conjunction with human models of peripheral and central sensitization'. Exploring signs of central sensitization in adolescents with hypermobility Spectrum disorder or hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1