Introducing Point-of-Care PCR technology in general practice: Ambiguities, experiences, and perceptions among health care professionals.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1177/13634593241254988
Line Maria Simonsen, Natasja Eilerskov, Rikke Sand Andersen, Jens Soendergaard, Jesper Bo Nielsen, Dorte Ejg Jarbøl, Trine Thilsing, Kirubakaran Balasubramaniam, Elisabeth Assing Hvidt
{"title":"Introducing Point-of-Care PCR technology in general practice: Ambiguities, experiences, and perceptions among health care professionals.","authors":"Line Maria Simonsen, Natasja Eilerskov, Rikke Sand Andersen, Jens Soendergaard, Jesper Bo Nielsen, Dorte Ejg Jarbøl, Trine Thilsing, Kirubakaran Balasubramaniam, Elisabeth Assing Hvidt","doi":"10.1177/13634593241254988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this paper we present findings from a qualitative ethnographic study investigating the experiences and perceptions of general practitioners and other practice staff when introducing a new point of care diagnostic test technology (point of care polymerase chain reaction (POC PCR)) in general practice in Denmark. The ethnographic study was conducted in five general practice clinics, involving observations in four of the clinics and interviews with general practitioners and practice staff in all five clinics. Following an initial analytic phase in which barriers and facilitators in the implementation process of the Point-of-Care test were identified, we developed theoretically informed themes, drawing upon Hartmut Rosa's social theory of technological acceleration. These themes included ambiguous experiences and perceptions of: (i) diagnostic specification and inflation embedded in diagnostic practices; (ii) empowerment and erosion of professional judgment; (iii) strategies of security and insecurity in communication; (iv) the interdependence between professional autonomy and economic structures associated with organizational power; and (v) subjective and organizational time. We discuss how diagnostic technologies simultaneously contribute to and disrupt treatment safety, efficiency, and medical decision-making. Using Rosa's sociological concepts of alienation and resonance, this article furthermore explores how these ambiguous dynamics are experienced in general practice settings. It also examines the implications of navigating a heterogeneous socio-technical and medical landscape and what it means to be a health professional in a contemporary general practice environment that is increasingly shaped by diagnostic technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12944,"journal":{"name":"Health","volume":" ","pages":"13634593241254988"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593241254988","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper we present findings from a qualitative ethnographic study investigating the experiences and perceptions of general practitioners and other practice staff when introducing a new point of care diagnostic test technology (point of care polymerase chain reaction (POC PCR)) in general practice in Denmark. The ethnographic study was conducted in five general practice clinics, involving observations in four of the clinics and interviews with general practitioners and practice staff in all five clinics. Following an initial analytic phase in which barriers and facilitators in the implementation process of the Point-of-Care test were identified, we developed theoretically informed themes, drawing upon Hartmut Rosa's social theory of technological acceleration. These themes included ambiguous experiences and perceptions of: (i) diagnostic specification and inflation embedded in diagnostic practices; (ii) empowerment and erosion of professional judgment; (iii) strategies of security and insecurity in communication; (iv) the interdependence between professional autonomy and economic structures associated with organizational power; and (v) subjective and organizational time. We discuss how diagnostic technologies simultaneously contribute to and disrupt treatment safety, efficiency, and medical decision-making. Using Rosa's sociological concepts of alienation and resonance, this article furthermore explores how these ambiguous dynamics are experienced in general practice settings. It also examines the implications of navigating a heterogeneous socio-technical and medical landscape and what it means to be a health professional in a contemporary general practice environment that is increasingly shaped by diagnostic technologies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在全科医疗中引入护理点 PCR 技术:医疗保健专业人员的模糊认识、经验和看法。
本文介绍了一项定性人种学研究的结果,该研究调查了丹麦全科医生和其他医务人员在全科诊所引入新的护理点诊断检测技术(护理点聚合酶链反应(POC PCR))时的经验和看法。这项人种学研究在五家全科诊所进行,包括对其中四家诊所的观察以及对所有五家诊所的全科医生和医务人员的访谈。在最初的分析阶段,我们确定了护理点检测实施过程中的障碍和促进因素,之后我们借鉴哈特穆特-罗萨的技术加速社会理论,提出了具有理论依据的主题。这些主题包括对以下方面的模糊体验和看法(i) 诊断实践中的诊断规范和通货膨胀;(ii) 专业判断的授权和侵蚀;(iii) 沟通中的安全和不安全策略;(iv) 专业自主和与组织权力相关的经济结构之间的相互依存关系;以及 (v) 主观时间和组织时间。我们讨论了诊断技术如何同时促进和破坏治疗安全、效率和医疗决策。本文利用罗莎的社会学概念 "异化 "和 "共鸣",进一步探讨了在全科医疗环境中如何体验这些模棱两可的动态。文章还探讨了驾驭异质社会技术和医疗环境的意义,以及在诊断技术日益影响的当代全科医疗环境中,作为一名医疗专业人员意味着什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health
Health Multiple-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Health: is published four times per year and attempts in each number to offer a mix of articles that inform or that provoke debate. The readership of the journal is wide and drawn from different disciplines and from workers both inside and outside the health care professions. Widely abstracted, Health: ensures authors an extensive and informed readership for their work. It also seeks to offer authors as short a delay as possible between submission and publication. Most articles are reviewed within 4-6 weeks of submission and those accepted are published within a year of that decision.
期刊最新文献
As if I was a spacecraft returning to Earth's atmosphere. Expanding insights into illness narratives and childhood cancer through evocative autoethnography. The practice of information appraisal: An ethnographic study of a health information intervention. Is Covid-19 "vaccine uptake" in postsecondary education a "problem"? A critical policy inquiry. Visualising, navigating and making time: The use of a digital solution in treatment and rehabilitation from low back pain. Sensing pain: Embodied knowledge in endometriosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1