Postoperative pain after endodontic treatment using 8.25% vs 2.5% sodium hypochlorite in necrotic mandibular molars with apical periodontitis

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of the American Dental Association Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.adaj.2024.04.011
{"title":"Postoperative pain after endodontic treatment using 8.25% vs 2.5% sodium hypochlorite in necrotic mandibular molars with apical periodontitis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.adaj.2024.04.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate whether the use of 8.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), compared with the use of 2.5% NaOCl, leads to higher postoperative pain<span> after endodontic treatment.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>A total of 154 patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups: 8.25% and 2.5% NaOCl. A single-visit endodontic treatment was performed using a standard protocol, varying only the NaOCl concentration. Postoperative pain was assessed using the numeric rating scale at multiple times over 30 days. Overall pain scores over time were explored via multilevel mixed-effects negative binomial regression. The need for pain medication was recorded and compared between groups via the Mann-Whitney </span><em>U</em> test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The use of 8.25% NaOCl increased postoperative pain scores over time by 3.48 times compared with the use of 2.5% NaOCl (incident rate ratio [IRR], 3.48; 95% CI, 1.57 to 7.67). Furthermore, the 8.25% NaOCl group exhibited higher pain incidence than the 2.5% NaOCl group during the 12-hour through 3-day period, with scores at these times ranging from 2.21 (IRR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.35 to 3.62) through 10.74 (IRR, 10.74; 95% CI, 3.74 to 30.87) higher. No difference was detected in the number of analgesic capsules administered between groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The use of 8.25% NaOCl resulted in higher postoperative pain than the use of 2.5% NaOCl, with pain scores increasing by 3.48 times when this solution was used. Furthermore, the 8.25% NaOCl group exhibited higher pain incidence than the 2.5% NaOCl group during the 12-hour through 3-day period.</p></div><div><h3>Practical Implications</h3><p>The use of 8.25% NaOCl during endodontic treatment can increase postoperative pain significantly. This clinical trial was registered at the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials database (RBR-6vq3hc4).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Dental Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Dental Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002817724002423","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to evaluate whether the use of 8.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), compared with the use of 2.5% NaOCl, leads to higher postoperative pain after endodontic treatment.

Methods

A total of 154 patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups: 8.25% and 2.5% NaOCl. A single-visit endodontic treatment was performed using a standard protocol, varying only the NaOCl concentration. Postoperative pain was assessed using the numeric rating scale at multiple times over 30 days. Overall pain scores over time were explored via multilevel mixed-effects negative binomial regression. The need for pain medication was recorded and compared between groups via the Mann-Whitney U test.

Results

The use of 8.25% NaOCl increased postoperative pain scores over time by 3.48 times compared with the use of 2.5% NaOCl (incident rate ratio [IRR], 3.48; 95% CI, 1.57 to 7.67). Furthermore, the 8.25% NaOCl group exhibited higher pain incidence than the 2.5% NaOCl group during the 12-hour through 3-day period, with scores at these times ranging from 2.21 (IRR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.35 to 3.62) through 10.74 (IRR, 10.74; 95% CI, 3.74 to 30.87) higher. No difference was detected in the number of analgesic capsules administered between groups.

Conclusions

The use of 8.25% NaOCl resulted in higher postoperative pain than the use of 2.5% NaOCl, with pain scores increasing by 3.48 times when this solution was used. Furthermore, the 8.25% NaOCl group exhibited higher pain incidence than the 2.5% NaOCl group during the 12-hour through 3-day period.

Practical Implications

The use of 8.25% NaOCl during endodontic treatment can increase postoperative pain significantly. This clinical trial was registered at the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials database (RBR-6vq3hc4).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对患有根尖牙周炎的坏死下颌磨牙使用 8.25% 与 2.5% 次氯酸钠进行牙髓治疗后的术后疼痛:随机双盲临床试验
背景:本研究旨在评估与使用 2.5% NaOCl 相比,使用 8.25% 次氯酸钠(NaOCl)是否会导致牙髓治疗后的术后疼痛加剧:共有 154 名患者被随机分为两组:8.25% 和 2.5% NaOCl。采用标准方案进行单次牙髓治疗,仅改变 NaOCl 浓度。在 30 天内多次使用数字评分量表对术后疼痛进行评估。通过多水平混合效应负二项回归分析了随时间变化的总体疼痛评分。通过 Mann-Whitney U 检验记录并比较了各组间的止痛药需求:结果:与使用 2.5% NaOCl 相比,使用 8.25% NaOCl 会使术后疼痛评分增加 3.48 倍(事故率比 [IRR],3.48;95% CI,1.57 至 7.67)。此外,与 2.5% NaOCl 组相比,8.25% NaOCl 组在 12 小时至 3 天期间的疼痛发生率更高,在这些时间段的评分从高 2.21(IRR,2.21;95% CI,1.35 至 3.62)到高 10.74(IRR,10.74;95% CI,3.74 至 30.87)不等。各组间使用的镇痛胶囊数量没有差异:结论:与使用 2.5% NaOCl 相比,使用 8.25% NaOCl 会导致更高的术后疼痛,使用该溶液时疼痛评分增加了 3.48 倍。此外,在 12 小时至 3 天期间,8.25% NaOCl 组的疼痛发生率高于 2.5% NaOCl 组:实际意义:在牙髓治疗过程中使用 8.25% NaOCl 会显著增加术后疼痛。该临床试验已在巴西临床试验注册数据库(RBR-6vq3hc4)注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Dental Association
Journal of the American Dental Association 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
10.30%
发文量
221
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: There is not a single source or solution to help dentists in their quest for lifelong learning, improving dental practice, and dental well-being. JADA+, along with The Journal of the American Dental Association, is striving to do just that, bringing together practical content covering dentistry topics and procedures to help dentists—both general dentists and specialists—provide better patient care and improve oral health and well-being. This is a work in progress; as we add more content, covering more topics of interest, it will continue to expand, becoming an ever-more essential source of oral health knowledge.
期刊最新文献
Maxillary radiolucency in a 54-year-old man. The effect of self-reported flossing behavior on cardiovascular disease events and mortality: Findings from the 2009-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. Fluid-filled blisters with background white striations. Motivational interviewing at home: A community trial to improve oral health literacy and reduce morbidity in disadvantaged Chilean families. Endodontic access with different computer navigation systems in calcified root canals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1