Dima Halabi, Gil Slutzkey, Haya Meir, Alon Sebaoun, Ilan Beitlitum
{"title":"Freehand versus computer-guided implant placement: early implant failures in a case-control study.","authors":"Dima Halabi, Gil Slutzkey, Haya Meir, Alon Sebaoun, Ilan Beitlitum","doi":"10.3290/j.qi.b5414733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the survival of fully guided implants placed with a hollow tooth-supported computerized surgical guide (TSSG).</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>This retrospective study included 94 patients who underwent implant placement using freehand or TSSG by the same operator between 2015 and 2020. Early implant failures occurring within 1-year post-rehabilitation were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the study, two types of implants were placed using two different techniques: TSSG and freehand. The TSSG group consisted of 84 S implants and 100 LP implants, and the freehand group included 90 S implants and 94 LP implants. The results showed that more implants survived when placed freehand compared to TSSG (181 [98.4%] vs 172 [93.5%], respectively, P .05). The only significant factor affecting the success rate was the type of implant, with LP implants having a higher survival rate in the TSSG group (P .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgeons should consider the impact of implant type on survival rates when utilizing the TSSG system.</p>","PeriodicalId":20831,"journal":{"name":"Quintessence international","volume":"0 0","pages":"548-558"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quintessence international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b5414733","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the survival of fully guided implants placed with a hollow tooth-supported computerized surgical guide (TSSG).
Method and materials: This retrospective study included 94 patients who underwent implant placement using freehand or TSSG by the same operator between 2015 and 2020. Early implant failures occurring within 1-year post-rehabilitation were assessed.
Results: In the study, two types of implants were placed using two different techniques: TSSG and freehand. The TSSG group consisted of 84 S implants and 100 LP implants, and the freehand group included 90 S implants and 94 LP implants. The results showed that more implants survived when placed freehand compared to TSSG (181 [98.4%] vs 172 [93.5%], respectively, P .05). The only significant factor affecting the success rate was the type of implant, with LP implants having a higher survival rate in the TSSG group (P .05).
Conclusion: Surgeons should consider the impact of implant type on survival rates when utilizing the TSSG system.
期刊介绍：
QI has a new contemporary design but continues its time-honored tradition of serving the needs of the general practitioner with clinically relevant articles that are scientifically based. Dr Eli Eliav and his editorial board are dedicated to practitioners worldwide through the presentation of high-level research, useful clinical procedures, and educational short case reports and clinical notes. Rigorous but timely manuscript review is the first order of business in their quest to publish a high-quality selection of articles in the multiple specialties and disciplines that encompass dentistry.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
