Cross Sectional Survey of Antenatal Educators' Views About Current Antenatal Education Provision.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Maternal and Child Health Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1007/s10995-024-03932-4
Tamarind Russell-Webster, Anna Davies, Miriam Toolan, Mary Lynch, Rachel Plachcinski, Michael Larkin, Abigail Fraser, Sonia Barnfield, Margaret Smith, Christy Burden, Abi Merriel
{"title":"Cross Sectional Survey of Antenatal Educators' Views About Current Antenatal Education Provision.","authors":"Tamarind Russell-Webster, Anna Davies, Miriam Toolan, Mary Lynch, Rachel Plachcinski, Michael Larkin, Abigail Fraser, Sonia Barnfield, Margaret Smith, Christy Burden, Abi Merriel","doi":"10.1007/s10995-024-03932-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Antenatal education (ANE) is part of National Health Service (NHS) care and is recommended by The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) to increase birth preparedness and help pregnant women/birthing people develop coping strategies for labour and birth. We aimed to understand antenatal educator views about how current ANE supports preparedness for childbirth, including coping strategy development with the aim of identifying targets for improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A United Kingdom wide, cross-sectional online survey was conducted between October 2019 and May 2020. Antenatal educators including NHS midwives and private providers were purposively sampled. Counts and percentages were calculated for closed responses and thematic analysis used for open text responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-nine participants responded, 62% of these did not believe that ANE prepared women for labour and birth. They identified practical barriers to accessing ANE, particularly for marginalised groups, including financial and language barriers. Educators believe class content is medically focused, and teaching is of variable quality with some midwives being ill-prepared to deliver antenatal education. 55% of antenatal educators believe the opportunity to develop coping strategies varies between location and educators and only those women who can pay for non-NHS classes are able to access all the coping strategies that can support them with labour and birth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions for practice: </strong>Antenatal educators believe current NHS ANE does not adequately prepare women for labour and birth, leading to disparities in birth preparedness for those who cannot access non-NHS classes. To reduce this healthcare inequality, NHS classes need to be standardised, with training for midwives in delivering ANE enhanced.</p>","PeriodicalId":48367,"journal":{"name":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1520-1529"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11358166/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-024-03932-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Antenatal education (ANE) is part of National Health Service (NHS) care and is recommended by The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) to increase birth preparedness and help pregnant women/birthing people develop coping strategies for labour and birth. We aimed to understand antenatal educator views about how current ANE supports preparedness for childbirth, including coping strategy development with the aim of identifying targets for improvement.

Methods: A United Kingdom wide, cross-sectional online survey was conducted between October 2019 and May 2020. Antenatal educators including NHS midwives and private providers were purposively sampled. Counts and percentages were calculated for closed responses and thematic analysis used for open text responses.

Results: Ninety-nine participants responded, 62% of these did not believe that ANE prepared women for labour and birth. They identified practical barriers to accessing ANE, particularly for marginalised groups, including financial and language barriers. Educators believe class content is medically focused, and teaching is of variable quality with some midwives being ill-prepared to deliver antenatal education. 55% of antenatal educators believe the opportunity to develop coping strategies varies between location and educators and only those women who can pay for non-NHS classes are able to access all the coping strategies that can support them with labour and birth.

Conclusions for practice: Antenatal educators believe current NHS ANE does not adequately prepare women for labour and birth, leading to disparities in birth preparedness for those who cannot access non-NHS classes. To reduce this healthcare inequality, NHS classes need to be standardised, with training for midwives in delivering ANE enhanced.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产前教育工作者对目前提供的产前教育的看法的横向调查。
目的:产前教育(ANE)是英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)医疗服务的一部分,也是英国国家健康与护理卓越研究所(NICE)推荐的提高分娩准备度和帮助孕妇/分娩者制定分娩和生产应对策略的方法。我们旨在了解产前教育工作者对当前 ANE 如何支持分娩准备(包括应对策略的制定)的看法,从而确定改进目标:我们于 2019 年 10 月至 2020 年 5 月期间在英国范围内开展了一项横断面在线调查。产前教育者包括英国国家医疗服务系统(NHS)的助产士和私立医疗机构的助产士。对封闭式回复计算计数和百分比,对开放式文本回复进行主题分析:结果:99 位参与者做出了回复,其中 62% 的人认为产前教育没有为妇女的分娩和生产做好准备。他们指出了在获得 ANE 方面存在的实际障碍,尤其是对边缘化群体而言,包括经济和语言障碍。教育者认为课堂内容以医学为重点,教学质量参差不齐,一些助产士没有做好提供产前教育的准备。55%的产前教育工作者认为,不同地区和不同教育工作者制定应对策略的机会不同,只有那些能够支付非 NHS 课程费用的妇女才能获得所有应对策略,以帮助她们顺利分娩:产前教育工作者认为,目前国家医疗服务体系的产前教育没有为妇女的分娩和生产做好充分准备,导致无法参加非国家医疗服务体系课程的妇女在生产准备方面存在差异。为了减少这种医疗保健方面的不平等,需要对 NHS 课程进行标准化,并加强对助产士提供产前教育的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Maternal and Child Health Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
271
期刊介绍: Maternal and Child Health Journal is the first exclusive forum to advance the scientific and professional knowledge base of the maternal and child health (MCH) field. This bimonthly provides peer-reviewed papers addressing the following areas of MCH practice, policy, and research: MCH epidemiology, demography, and health status assessment Innovative MCH service initiatives Implementation of MCH programs MCH policy analysis and advocacy MCH professional development. Exploring the full spectrum of the MCH field, Maternal and Child Health Journal is an important tool for practitioners as well as academics in public health, obstetrics, gynecology, prenatal medicine, pediatrics, and neonatology. Sponsors include the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs (AMCHP), the Association of Teachers of Maternal and Child Health (ATMCH), and CityMatCH.
期刊最新文献
Educational Intervention to Promote Parent/Caregiver Self-Efficacy in the Management and Control of Childhood Asthma: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Navigating the Global Pandemic in Pediatric Overweight and Obesity: Emerging Challenges and Proposed Solutions. Building Collective Power to Advance Maternal and Child Health Equity: Lessons from the New Orleans Maternal and Child Health Coalition. A Quality Improvement Approach to Increasing Access to long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives in a Federally Qualified Health Center. Association Between a Mother's Cervical Cancer Screening and Child's Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination Status.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1