Retaliatory Termination of Physician Employment by Hospitals: The Case of Zelman versus Cape Cod Hospital.

Q2 Medicine Hospital Topics Pub Date : 2024-05-30 DOI:10.1080/00185868.2024.2359557
Vincent Maher, Mark Cwiek
{"title":"Retaliatory Termination of Physician Employment by Hospitals: The Case of Zelman versus Cape Cod Hospital.","authors":"Vincent Maher, Mark Cwiek","doi":"10.1080/00185868.2024.2359557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A disturbing problem in the United States is that of illegal termination by hospitals of professional employees. Nurses, for example, have consistently decried poor staffing levels and, more recently in times of COVID-19, inadequate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) that places both nurse and patient at high risk. For the most part, hospitals do little to correct these issues. The complaints have usually been kept \"in house\" and the nurses were expected to \"stand down\" once they'd complained. Physicians, who are now employees in growing numbers, have also filed formal complaints with professional associations, States' licensing authorities, and also with States Boards of Health. When this happens, it is not unusual to hear that the physicians who were in good standing and who filed the complaints have been dismissed from their employment even in cases where the physicians have been long term employees of hospitals. Terminated medical employees have sued their former employers. This paper examines the issue of employment of professionals by hospitals, in particular physicians, and causes for termination that are legal. The paper will also examine, by means of analyzing a current case (Zelman), the termination of employment of a physician that appears to be illegal/retaliatory. The paper concludes by demonstrating civil penalties that can attach to the successful proof of retaliatory termination by reviewing of some recent cases that are illuminating in their outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":55886,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Topics","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital Topics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00185868.2024.2359557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A disturbing problem in the United States is that of illegal termination by hospitals of professional employees. Nurses, for example, have consistently decried poor staffing levels and, more recently in times of COVID-19, inadequate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) that places both nurse and patient at high risk. For the most part, hospitals do little to correct these issues. The complaints have usually been kept "in house" and the nurses were expected to "stand down" once they'd complained. Physicians, who are now employees in growing numbers, have also filed formal complaints with professional associations, States' licensing authorities, and also with States Boards of Health. When this happens, it is not unusual to hear that the physicians who were in good standing and who filed the complaints have been dismissed from their employment even in cases where the physicians have been long term employees of hospitals. Terminated medical employees have sued their former employers. This paper examines the issue of employment of professionals by hospitals, in particular physicians, and causes for termination that are legal. The paper will also examine, by means of analyzing a current case (Zelman), the termination of employment of a physician that appears to be illegal/retaliatory. The paper concludes by demonstrating civil penalties that can attach to the successful proof of retaliatory termination by reviewing of some recent cases that are illuminating in their outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医院报复性解雇医生:泽尔曼诉鳕鱼角医院案》。
在美国,一个令人不安的问题是医院非法解雇专业雇员。例如,护士们一直抱怨人员配备不足,最近在 COVID-19 事件中又抱怨个人防护设备(PPE)不足,导致护士和病人都处于高风险之中。在大多数情况下,医院很少纠正这些问题。投诉通常都是 "内部 "处理,护士一旦投诉就会 "退出"。现在,越来越多的医生也向专业协会、州执照颁发机构和州卫生委员会提出正式投诉。当这种情况发生时,经常会听到那些信誉良好并提出投诉的医生被解雇的消息,即使这些医生是医院的长期雇员。被解雇的医务人员起诉了他们的前雇主。本文探讨了医院雇用专业人员(尤其是医生)的问题,以及合法解雇的原因。本文还将通过分析当前的一个案例(泽尔曼案),研究解雇一名医生似乎是非法/报复性的。最后,本文将通过审查近期一些具有启发性的案例,说明成功证明报复性解雇后可能附带的民事处罚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hospital Topics
Hospital Topics Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Hospital Topics is the longest continuously published healthcare journal in the United States. Since 1922, Hospital Topics has provided healthcare professionals with research they can apply to improve the quality of access, management, and delivery of healthcare. Dedicated to those who bring healthcare to the public, Hospital Topics spans the whole spectrum of healthcare issues including, but not limited to information systems, fatigue management, medication errors, nursing compensation, midwifery, job satisfaction among managers, team building, and bringing primary care to rural areas. Through articles on theory, applied research, and practice, Hospital Topics addresses the central concerns of today"s healthcare professional and leader.
期刊最新文献
Standard Inpatient Class Policy Implementation in Public Hospitals in Indonesia: Strengthening Strategy. Effectiveness of Interdisciplinary Simulation Training on the Self-Efficacy and Anxiety of Healthcare Professionals in Managing a Medical Emergency. The Continuing Debate: Do For-Profit Hospitals Provide More Charity Care as Compared to Not-For-Profit Hospitals? Improved Ventilator Weaning and Decannulation Outcomes with Enhanced Staffing Model. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Personnel Involved in Bio Medical Waste Handling about COVID-19 & Its Bio-Medical Waste Management: A Descriptive Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1