Melting curve analysis reveals false-positive norovirus detection in a molecular syndromic panel

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 VIROLOGY Journal of Clinical Virology Pub Date : 2024-05-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jcv.2024.105697
Nancy Matic , Tanya Lawson , Matthew Young , Willson Jang , Jennifer Bilawka , Leah Gowland , Gordon Ritchie , Victor Leung , Michael Payne , Aleksandra Stefanovic , Marc G. Romney , Christopher F. Lowe
{"title":"Melting curve analysis reveals false-positive norovirus detection in a molecular syndromic panel","authors":"Nancy Matic ,&nbsp;Tanya Lawson ,&nbsp;Matthew Young ,&nbsp;Willson Jang ,&nbsp;Jennifer Bilawka ,&nbsp;Leah Gowland ,&nbsp;Gordon Ritchie ,&nbsp;Victor Leung ,&nbsp;Michael Payne ,&nbsp;Aleksandra Stefanovic ,&nbsp;Marc G. Romney ,&nbsp;Christopher F. Lowe","doi":"10.1016/j.jcv.2024.105697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Molecular syndromic panels can improve rapidity of results and ease clinical laboratory workflow, although caution has been raised for potential false-positive results. Upon implementation of a new panel for infectious diarrhea (BioFire® FilmArray® Gastrointestinal [GI] Panel, bioMérieux) in our clinical laboratory, a higher than expected number of stool samples with norovirus were detected.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The goal of this study was to investigate positive percent agreement and the false-positive rate of norovirus detected by the multiplex BioFire GI panel compared to a singleplex commercial assay.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>From October 2023 to January 2024, all prospective stool samples with a positive norovirus result by BioFire had melting curves reviewed manually using the BioFire FilmArray Torch System. Stool samples further underwent testing by a supplementary real-time RT-PCR assay (Xpert® Norovirus, Cepheid) for comparative analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 50 stool samples with norovirus detected by BioFire, 18 (36 %) tested negative by Xpert (deemed \"false-positives\"). Furthermore, melting curve analysis revealed nearly all of these samples had atypical melting curve morphologies for the \"Noro-1\" target on BioFire (16/18, 89 %), which was statistically significant (Odds Ratio 173.2, 95 % CI [22.2, 5326.9], <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). Stool samples with multiple pathogens detected by BioFire including norovirus were not more likely to produce false-positive norovirus results (Odds Ratio 1, 95 % CI [0.3, 3.3], <em>p</em> = 1).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although not described in the manufacturer's <em>Instructions for Use</em>, we propose routine manual review of melting curves for the BioFire GI panel prior to reporting, to mitigate potential false-positive norovirus results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15517,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Virology","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 105697"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386653224000593/pdfft?md5=c423b5c837627ec86baa64edd7c77889&pid=1-s2.0-S1386653224000593-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386653224000593","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Molecular syndromic panels can improve rapidity of results and ease clinical laboratory workflow, although caution has been raised for potential false-positive results. Upon implementation of a new panel for infectious diarrhea (BioFire® FilmArray® Gastrointestinal [GI] Panel, bioMérieux) in our clinical laboratory, a higher than expected number of stool samples with norovirus were detected.

Objectives

The goal of this study was to investigate positive percent agreement and the false-positive rate of norovirus detected by the multiplex BioFire GI panel compared to a singleplex commercial assay.

Study design

From October 2023 to January 2024, all prospective stool samples with a positive norovirus result by BioFire had melting curves reviewed manually using the BioFire FilmArray Torch System. Stool samples further underwent testing by a supplementary real-time RT-PCR assay (Xpert® Norovirus, Cepheid) for comparative analysis.

Results

Of the 50 stool samples with norovirus detected by BioFire, 18 (36 %) tested negative by Xpert (deemed "false-positives"). Furthermore, melting curve analysis revealed nearly all of these samples had atypical melting curve morphologies for the "Noro-1" target on BioFire (16/18, 89 %), which was statistically significant (Odds Ratio 173.2, 95 % CI [22.2, 5326.9], p < 0.0001). Stool samples with multiple pathogens detected by BioFire including norovirus were not more likely to produce false-positive norovirus results (Odds Ratio 1, 95 % CI [0.3, 3.3], p = 1).

Conclusions

Although not described in the manufacturer's Instructions for Use, we propose routine manual review of melting curves for the BioFire GI panel prior to reporting, to mitigate potential false-positive norovirus results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
熔融曲线分析揭示了分子综合征面板中诺如病毒检测的假阳性。
背景:分子综合征检测板可提高检测结果的快速性并简化临床实验室的工作流程,但也有人对潜在的假阳性结果提出了警告。在我们的临床实验室采用新的感染性腹泻检测板(生物梅里埃公司的 BioFire® FilmArray® Gastrointestinal [GI] Panel)后,检测出诺如病毒的粪便样本数量高于预期:本研究的目的是调查多重 BioFire GI 面板与单重商用检测法相比,检测出诺如病毒的阳性率和假阳性率:研究设计:从 2023 年 10 月到 2024 年 1 月,使用 BioFire FilmArray Torch 系统对 BioFire 检测出诺如病毒阳性的所有预期粪便样本的熔解曲线进行人工审核。粪便样本还需进行辅助实时 RT-PCR 检测(Xpert® Norovirus,Cepheid),以进行比较分析:结果:在 BioFire 检测出诺如病毒的 50 份粪便样本中,有 18 份(36%)经 Xpert 检测为阴性(被视为 "假阳性")。此外,熔解曲线分析表明,几乎所有这些样本的 BioFire "Noro-1 "目标熔解曲线形态都不典型(16/18,89%),具有显著的统计学意义(Odds Ratio 173.2,95% CI [22.2,5326.9],p < 0.0001)。BioFire 检测到包括诺如病毒在内的多种病原体的粪便样本并不更容易产生诺如病毒假阳性结果(Odds Ratio 1,95 % CI [0.3,3.3],p = 1):尽管制造商的《使用说明》中没有说明,但我们建议在报告前对 BioFire 消化道样本的熔解曲线进行常规人工审核,以减少诺如病毒的潜在假阳性结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Virology
Journal of Clinical Virology 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
22.70
自引率
1.10%
发文量
149
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Virology, an esteemed international publication, serves as the official journal for both the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology and The European Society for Clinical Virology. Dedicated to advancing the understanding of human virology in clinical settings, the Journal of Clinical Virology focuses on disseminating research papers and reviews pertaining to the clinical aspects of virology. Its scope encompasses articles discussing diagnostic methodologies and virus-induced clinical conditions, with an emphasis on practicality and relevance to clinical practice. The journal publishes on topics that include: • new diagnostic technologies • nucleic acid amplification and serologic testing • targeted and metagenomic next-generation sequencing • emerging pandemic viral threats • respiratory viruses • transplant viruses • chronic viral infections • cancer-associated viruses • gastrointestinal viruses • central nervous system viruses • one health (excludes animal health)
期刊最新文献
Nucleic acid amplification testing using dried blood spots to confirm the diagnosis of HIV-1 in adults. Quantification of human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) viral load in plasma: Comparison of three commercial assays. Coinfections and iterative detection of respiratory viruses among 17,689 patients between March 2021 and December 2022 in Southern France Performance evaluation of the Abbott Alinity Hepatitis C antigen next assay in a US urban emergency department population Standardization and evaluation of an in-house ELISA for the detection of rabies antibody in a tertiary care centre in South India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1