Accurate detection of copy number aberrations in FFPE samples using the mFAST-SeqS approach

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY Experimental and molecular pathology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.yexmp.2024.104906
Aude Jary , Yongsoo Kim , Kirsten Rozemeijer , Paul P. Eijk , Ramon P. van der Zee , Maaike C.G. Bleeker , Saskia M. Wilting , Renske D.M. Steenbergen
{"title":"Accurate detection of copy number aberrations in FFPE samples using the mFAST-SeqS approach","authors":"Aude Jary ,&nbsp;Yongsoo Kim ,&nbsp;Kirsten Rozemeijer ,&nbsp;Paul P. Eijk ,&nbsp;Ramon P. van der Zee ,&nbsp;Maaike C.G. Bleeker ,&nbsp;Saskia M. Wilting ,&nbsp;Renske D.M. Steenbergen","doi":"10.1016/j.yexmp.2024.104906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Shallow whole genome sequencing (Shallow-seq) is used to determine the copy number aberrations (CNA) in tissue samples and circulating tumor DNA. However, costs of NGS and challenges of small biopsies ask for an alternative to the untargeted NGS approaches. The mFAST-SeqS approach, relying on LINE-1 repeat amplification, showed a good correlation with Shallow-seq to detect CNA in blood samples. In the present study, we evaluated whether mFAST-SeqS is suitable to assess CNA in small formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue specimens, using vulva and anal HPV-related lesions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Seventy-two FFPE samples, including 36 control samples (19 vulva;17 anal) for threshold setting and 36 samples (24 vulva; 12 anal) for clinical evaluation, were analyzed by mFAST-SeqS. CNA in vulva and anal lesions were determined by calculating genome-wide and chromosome arm-specific z-scores in comparison with the respective control samples. Sixteen samples were also analyzed with the conventional Shallow-seq approach.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Genome-wide z-scores increased with the severity of disease, with highest values being found in cancers. In vulva samples median and inter quartile ranges [IQR] were 1[0–2] in normal tissues (<em>n</em> = 4), 3[1–7] in premalignant lesions (<em>n</em> = 9) and 21[13–48] in cancers (<em>n</em> = 10). In anal samples, median [IQR] were 0[0–1] in normal tissues (<em>n</em> = 4), 14[6–38] in premalignant lesions (n = 4) and 18[9–31] in cancers (n = 4). At threshold 4, all controls were CNA negative, while 8/13 premalignant lesions and 12/14 cancers were CNA positive. CNA captured by mFAST-SeqS were mostly also found by Shallow-seq.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>mFAST-SeqS is easy to perform, requires less DNA and less sequencing reads reducing costs, thereby providing a good alternative for Shallow-seq to determine CNA in small FFPE samples.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12176,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and molecular pathology","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 104906"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001448002400025X/pdfft?md5=d05099e109fc94865c7001cbe5c5f572&pid=1-s2.0-S001448002400025X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and molecular pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001448002400025X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Shallow whole genome sequencing (Shallow-seq) is used to determine the copy number aberrations (CNA) in tissue samples and circulating tumor DNA. However, costs of NGS and challenges of small biopsies ask for an alternative to the untargeted NGS approaches. The mFAST-SeqS approach, relying on LINE-1 repeat amplification, showed a good correlation with Shallow-seq to detect CNA in blood samples. In the present study, we evaluated whether mFAST-SeqS is suitable to assess CNA in small formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue specimens, using vulva and anal HPV-related lesions.

Methods

Seventy-two FFPE samples, including 36 control samples (19 vulva;17 anal) for threshold setting and 36 samples (24 vulva; 12 anal) for clinical evaluation, were analyzed by mFAST-SeqS. CNA in vulva and anal lesions were determined by calculating genome-wide and chromosome arm-specific z-scores in comparison with the respective control samples. Sixteen samples were also analyzed with the conventional Shallow-seq approach.

Results

Genome-wide z-scores increased with the severity of disease, with highest values being found in cancers. In vulva samples median and inter quartile ranges [IQR] were 1[0–2] in normal tissues (n = 4), 3[1–7] in premalignant lesions (n = 9) and 21[13–48] in cancers (n = 10). In anal samples, median [IQR] were 0[0–1] in normal tissues (n = 4), 14[6–38] in premalignant lesions (n = 4) and 18[9–31] in cancers (n = 4). At threshold 4, all controls were CNA negative, while 8/13 premalignant lesions and 12/14 cancers were CNA positive. CNA captured by mFAST-SeqS were mostly also found by Shallow-seq.

Conclusion

mFAST-SeqS is easy to perform, requires less DNA and less sequencing reads reducing costs, thereby providing a good alternative for Shallow-seq to determine CNA in small FFPE samples.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用 mFAST-SeqS 方法准确检测 FFPE 样本中的拷贝数畸变。
背景:浅层全基因组测序(Shallow-seq)用于确定组织样本和循环肿瘤 DNA 中的拷贝数畸变(CNA)。然而,NGS 的成本和小活检的挑战要求在非靶向 NGS 方法之外寻找一种替代方法。依靠 LINE-1 重复扩增的 mFAST-SeqS 方法与 Shallow-seq 检测血液样本中的 CNA 有很好的相关性。在本研究中,我们利用外阴和肛门HPV相关病变,评估了mFAST-SeqS是否适用于评估小型福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)组织标本中的CNA:采用mFAST-SeqS分析了72份FFPE样本,包括用于设定阈值的36份对照样本(19份外阴样本;17份肛门样本)和用于临床评估的36份样本(24份外阴样本;12份肛门样本)。通过计算与相应对照样本比较的全基因组和染色体臂特异性 z score,确定外阴和肛门病变中的 CNA。此外,还采用传统的 Shallow-seq 方法分析了 16 个样本:结果:全基因组z-scores随疾病的严重程度而增加,癌症中的z-scores值最高。在外阴样本中,正常组织(4 个)的中位数和四分位数间距[IQR]为 1[0-2],癌前病变(9 个)的中位数和四分位数间距[IQR]为 3[1-7],癌症(10 个)的中位数和四分位数间距[IQR]为 21[13-48]。在肛门样本中,正常组织(4 个)的中位数[IQR]为 0[0-1],癌前病变(4 个)为 14[6-38],癌症(4 个)为 18[9-31]。在临界值 4,所有对照组均为 CNA 阴性,而 8/13 个恶性肿瘤前病变和 12/14 个癌症均为 CNA 阳性。结论:mFAST-SeqS操作简便,所需DNA和测序读数较少,可降低成本,因此是Shallow-seq测定小型FFPE样本中CNA的良好替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
11.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Under new editorial leadership, Experimental and Molecular Pathology presents original articles on disease processes in relation to structural and biochemical alterations in mammalian tissues and fluids and on the application of newer techniques of molecular biology to problems of pathology in humans and other animals. The journal also publishes selected interpretive synthesis reviews by bench level investigators working at the "cutting edge" of contemporary research in pathology. In addition, special thematic issues present original research reports that unravel some of Nature''s most jealously guarded secrets on the pathologic basis of disease. Research Areas include: Stem cells; Neoangiogenesis; Molecular diagnostics; Polymerase chain reaction; In situ hybridization; DNA sequencing; Cell receptors; Carcinogenesis; Pathobiology of neoplasia; Complex infectious diseases; Transplantation; Cytokines; Flow cytomeric analysis; Inflammation; Cellular injury; Immunology and hypersensitivity; Athersclerosis.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Irisin and neuroinflammation: Challenges and opportunities" [Experimental and Molecular Pathology 140 (2024) 104941]. Diagnostic criteria and therapeutic implications of rapid-onset demyelinating polyneuropathies Irisin and neuroinflammation: Challenges and opportunities Assessing pathogenicity of mismatch repair variants of uncertain significance by molecular tumor analysis Impaired immunoproteasomal function exacerbates renal ischemia-reperfusion injury
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1