Latarjet procedure restores range of motion at 6 months postoperatively: a prospective cohort study using motion capture analysis

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.070
Austin F. Smith MD , Philippe Collin MD , Alaa Elsenbsy MD , Jeanni Zbinden MD , Arash Amiri MD , Alberto Guizzi MD , Alexandre Lädermann MD
{"title":"Latarjet procedure restores range of motion at 6 months postoperatively: a prospective cohort study using motion capture analysis","authors":"Austin F. Smith MD ,&nbsp;Philippe Collin MD ,&nbsp;Alaa Elsenbsy MD ,&nbsp;Jeanni Zbinden MD ,&nbsp;Arash Amiri MD ,&nbsp;Alberto Guizzi MD ,&nbsp;Alexandre Lädermann MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is a common concern that range of motion (ROM) is negatively affected by the Latarjet procedure. We hypothesize that the Latarjet procedure results in full recovery of ROM postoperatively and significantly improved patient-reported outcome measures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patient data were prospectively collected from a randomized controlled trial to analyze outcomes after open Latarjet procedure. Inclusion criteria involved a minimum follow-up of 6 months and unilateral shoulder instability. Study outcome was assessed by postoperative ROM at 6 months postoperatively and compared to the preoperative ROM of the ipsilateral shoulder as well as the ROM of the unaffected contralateral shoulder. All ROM measurements were performed using a motion capture system to ensure consistent and reliable measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included a total of 84 patients. ROM was measured in external rotation with the shoulder adducted (ER1), external rotation with the shoulder abducted 90° (ER2), internal rotation with the arm abducted 90° (IR2), and active forward elevation (AE). The mean difference in ROM between the operated arm vs. the contralateral healthy arm at 6 months postoperatively was 3.4° in ER1 (<em>P</em> = .19), 4.2° in ER2 (<em>P</em> = .086), 2.2° in IR2 (<em>P</em> = .36), and 2.4° in AE (<em>P</em> = .045). Subanalysis of patients with and without sling use revealed no significant difference in ROM between the operated shoulder and the contralateral shoulder at 6 months in either group, with the exception of ER2 in the sling group. In this latter group, ROM was 71° in the operated arm and 79° in the contralateral arm (<em>P</em> = .0094). Mean preoperative pain score was 25.7 (95% CI 21.4-30.1) vs. 13.0 postoperatively at 6 months (95% CI 9.50-16.5) (<em>P</em> &lt; .00001). Mean preoperative Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation instability was 42.9 (95% CI 38.4-47.3) vs. 86.2 postoperatively at 6 months (95% CI 83.6-88.7) (<em>P</em> &lt; .00001). Mean preoperative Rowe score was 38.5 (95% CI 34.3-42.7) vs. 84.3 at postoperative month 6 (95% CI 81.1-87.4) (<em>P</em> &lt; .00001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Latarjet procedure performed for anterior instability using a capsular repair results in complete ROM recovery in ER1, ER2, and IR2 at 6 months postoperatively, with only a slight discrepancy in active elevation. Sling use after the Latarjet procedure results in no benefit over postoperative recovery without the use of a sling. Sling use negatively affects the ROM in ER2, taking as reference the contralateral arm of the same patient, when compared to patients who did not use a sling postoperatively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":"33 12","pages":"Pages 2878-2885"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058274624003872","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There is a common concern that range of motion (ROM) is negatively affected by the Latarjet procedure. We hypothesize that the Latarjet procedure results in full recovery of ROM postoperatively and significantly improved patient-reported outcome measures.

Methods

Patient data were prospectively collected from a randomized controlled trial to analyze outcomes after open Latarjet procedure. Inclusion criteria involved a minimum follow-up of 6 months and unilateral shoulder instability. Study outcome was assessed by postoperative ROM at 6 months postoperatively and compared to the preoperative ROM of the ipsilateral shoulder as well as the ROM of the unaffected contralateral shoulder. All ROM measurements were performed using a motion capture system to ensure consistent and reliable measurements.

Results

The study included a total of 84 patients. ROM was measured in external rotation with the shoulder adducted (ER1), external rotation with the shoulder abducted 90° (ER2), internal rotation with the arm abducted 90° (IR2), and active forward elevation (AE). The mean difference in ROM between the operated arm vs. the contralateral healthy arm at 6 months postoperatively was 3.4° in ER1 (P = .19), 4.2° in ER2 (P = .086), 2.2° in IR2 (P = .36), and 2.4° in AE (P = .045). Subanalysis of patients with and without sling use revealed no significant difference in ROM between the operated shoulder and the contralateral shoulder at 6 months in either group, with the exception of ER2 in the sling group. In this latter group, ROM was 71° in the operated arm and 79° in the contralateral arm (P = .0094). Mean preoperative pain score was 25.7 (95% CI 21.4-30.1) vs. 13.0 postoperatively at 6 months (95% CI 9.50-16.5) (P < .00001). Mean preoperative Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation instability was 42.9 (95% CI 38.4-47.3) vs. 86.2 postoperatively at 6 months (95% CI 83.6-88.7) (P < .00001). Mean preoperative Rowe score was 38.5 (95% CI 34.3-42.7) vs. 84.3 at postoperative month 6 (95% CI 81.1-87.4) (P < .00001).

Conclusions

Latarjet procedure performed for anterior instability using a capsular repair results in complete ROM recovery in ER1, ER2, and IR2 at 6 months postoperatively, with only a slight discrepancy in active elevation. Sling use after the Latarjet procedure results in no benefit over postoperative recovery without the use of a sling. Sling use negatively affects the ROM in ER2, taking as reference the contralateral arm of the same patient, when compared to patients who did not use a sling postoperatively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Latarjet 术后 6 个月恢复活动范围:一项利用运动捕捉分析的前瞻性队列研究。
背景:人们普遍担心Latarjet手术会对活动范围(ROM)产生负面影响。我们假设,Latarjet 手术能使患者术后的活动范围完全恢复,并显著改善患者报告的结果指标:方法:从一项随机对照试验中前瞻性地收集患者数据,分析开放式 Latarjet 手术后的疗效。纳入标准包括至少六个月的随访和单侧肩关节不稳定。研究结果通过术后六个月的ROM进行评估,并与同侧肩关节术前的ROM和未受影响的对侧肩关节的ROM进行比较。所有ROM测量均通过运动捕捉系统进行,以确保测量结果的一致性和可靠性:研究共包括 84 名患者。ROM的测量包括肩关节外展时的外旋(ER1)、肩关节外展90度时的外旋(ER2)、手臂外展90度时的内旋(IR2)和主动前抬(AE)。术后六个月时,手术手臂与对侧健康手臂的活动度平均差异为:ER1为3.4度(P=0.19),ER2为4.2度(P=0.086),IR2为2.2度(P=0.36),AE为2.4度(P=0.045)。对使用和未使用吊带的患者进行的子分析表明,除了使用吊带组的ER2患者外,其他两组患者在6个月时手术肩和对侧肩关节的ROM均无明显差异。在后一组中,接受手术的手臂的活动度为 71 度,而对侧手臂的活动度为 79 度(P=0.0094)。术前平均疼痛评分为 25.7 分(21.4-30.1,95%CI),术后 6 个月平均疼痛评分为 13.0 分(9.50-16.5,95%CI)(p 结论:术后 6 个月平均疼痛评分为 13.0 分(9.50-16.5,95%CI):利用关节囊修复的Latarjet手术治疗前路不稳,术后6个月时ER1、ER2和IR2的ROM完全恢复,仅在主动抬高方面略有差异。与不使用吊衣的术后恢复相比,Latarjet 术后使用吊衣没有任何益处。与术后不使用吊衣的病人相比,以同一病人的对侧手臂为参照,使用吊衣会对ER2的ROM产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Computational analysis of compressive joint stability and acromial stress associated with varied rotator cuff integrity after reverse shoulder arthroplasty Glenoid bony anatomy in patients with epilepsy is influenced by their tonic-clonic seizure burden Patellar lateral facet allograft as a potential graft source in glenoid bone reconstructions for anterior shoulder instability: an MRI-based morphometric analysis Operative management of posterolateral rotatory instability in females: favorable 6-year outcomes in primary and revision elbows Doxycycline sclerotherapy for recurrent acromioclavicular joint cyst: a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1